Claver Kamana

19.04.2016 ( Last modified: 13.06.2016 )
Trial Watch would like to remind its users that any person charged by national or international authorities is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

facts

Kamana Claver was born in 1940 in Rwanda. He worked as a businessman in Rwanda and was said to have been a local leader of the Interahamwe militia. This group had been involved since 1990 in organising the massacres which took place in 1994.

Kamana was accused of being a major instigator and participant in running the Rwandan genocide, between April and July 1994. He was accused of organising, supervising and participating in massacres, lootings, rapes, inhumane treatment, as well as for inciting racial hatred, in the town of Runda located in southern Rwanda.

Kamana has lived in France under a regular resident permit since 1999, where he unsuccessfully claimed political asylum.

Kamana was arrested on 26 February 2008 in Annecy on the basis of an international arrest warrant issued by Kigali.

legal procedure

Kamana was arrested on 26 February 2008 in Annecy on the basis of an international arrest warrant issued by Kigali.

He appeared on the list of the 96 key planners of the genocide who are being sought by the Rwandan justice system. Kamana was the fourth Rwandan sought by Kigali to be arrested in France since June 2007. He was first sentenced in absentia to death by a Rwandan court. This sentence was subsequently converted into a life sentence, since Rwanda abolished the death penatly in July 2007.

On 2 April 2008, the Court of Appeals delivered a favourable decision on the issue of his extradition to Rwanda. Kamana appealed against this decision. On 9 July 2008, the Highest Appeals Court rendered a decision denying Kamana’s extradition to Rwanda. The Court thereby annulled the previous decision and sent the case back to the Chambéry Appeals Court.

Kamana was released on 29 July 2008 while awaiting a new examination of Rwanda’s extradition request. The extradition request was rejected by the Court of Appeals in Lyon on 10 January 2009 in last instance.

spotlight

The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda :

The Rwandan genocide was accomplished under the deafening silence of world public opinion. The international community did little to stop the massacres and the United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) was powerless before the genocidaires who vastly outnumbered the contingent of UN peacekeeping troops.

In order to facilitate the process of national reconciliation and to promote peace in the country, the United Nations Organization created, by its resolution 955 of 8 November 1994, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR), located in Arusha, Tanzania.

The function of the Tribunal is to try perpetrators of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, committed between 1 January and 31 December 1994. Since its creation, and until end December 2009, the ICTR has ruled on around 50 cases and almost as many are still underway.

However, due to the high number of prisoners awaiting trial, the lack of sufficient chambers and the difficulty encountered by the Tribunal to meet procedural deadlines, new jurisdictions were created to find more expeditious means of delivering justice in order to continue to fight effectively against the culture of impunity and denial about the killings and to hopefully strengthen national unity.

Gacaca Jurisdictions:

Starting in 1998, under the direction of the President of Rwanda, a process of meditation and reflection was initiated to consider the possible use of traditional courts in order to support the ordinary judicial system which was overwhelmed. A commission was created to study this option and the report it issued became the basis of the Organic Law No. 40/2000 of 26 January 2001, which created the Gacaca Jurisdictions.
These traditional courts (Gacaca means “cut grass” and these courts have their origin in the Rwandan tradition, in which community members used to sit on the grass as they solved their various disputes) are composed of elected popular assemblies and organized according to the country’s four administrative levels namely, the cell, sector, district/town and province/city of Kigali.

The first phase of the Gacaca process involves investigations and data collection on the genocide. Each household is contacted for information, leading to the opening up of files for suspects.

These suspects are then grouped into three categories. The first category concerns the most important genocide suspects- the planners, organizers and supervisors of the genocide who are still required to be tried by the ICTR.

The second category is composed of authors of propaganda material that fuelled genocide as well as those who were given instructions to kill. The third category comprises those who destroyed or looted property. It is both of these categories that are judged by the Gacaca courts.

Each administrative category is made up of a General Assembly, a Bureau and a Co-ordination Committee. Their members are elected citizens who fulfill the conditions of eligibility (to be over 21 years old, not to have participated in the commission of the crime of genocide war crimes or crimes against humanity…).
At local level, in accordance with tradition the villagers elect nine representatives to be the judges for each court which has the power to sentence criminals up to life imprisonment, but not the death penalty
Finally, Gacaca courts are based primarily on considerations of confession and testimony, which unearth participation in the genocide but which are also intended to provide grounds for reconciliation.

Trial Watch does not have the means to follow all of the Gacaca trials and focuses mainly on the judgments rendered by the ICTR.