Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud Al-Qosi

19.04.2016 ( Last modified: 24.08.2016 )
Trial Watch would like to remind its users that any person charged by national or international authorities is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

facts

Ibrahim Ahmed Mahmoud al Qosi is a Sudanese citizen, born on 3 July 1960 in Khartoum. He grew up in a middle class religious family and spent a great amount of time at the mosque. Being an average student, he was unable to obtain a place at university. His family said that it had lost all trace of him from 1996.

It was from this year onwards that the American authorities accused him of being a member of Al Qaeda as well as being the driver and bodyguard of Osama bin Laden. Until the beginning of 1998, he was reported to be in charge of raising logistic and financial support for the terrorist group. At that time he was based in the “Star of Jihad” camp close to Jalalabad in Afghanistan. Between 1998 and 2001, he is said to have lived in another Al Qaeda complex near to Kandahar where he was responsible for questions related to security, transport and food and other supplies. Moreover, he was also suspected at the time of being a member of a group which went regularly to the front line close to Kabul to engage in firing heavy ammunition.

In 2001, he reportedly evacuated Kandahar for Kabul then went to Jalalabad and finally to the mountains in the region of Tora Bora.

On 30 November 2001, he was arrested by the Pakistani military as he was trying to escape from Afghanistan. He was subsequently handed over to the American authorities together with about forty other persons all of whom were suspected of being close to bin Laden. Since then he has been held as prisoner No 54 at the American military base in Guantanamo on the island of Cuba.

legal procedure

Ahmed Mahmoud al Qosi was arrested on 30 November 2001 close to Tora Bora in Afghanistan. Since then he has been held as prisoner No 54 at the American military base in Guantanamo on the island of Cuba.

On 24 February 2004, his name was listed by the authorities as being part of a group of prisoners, including Ali Hamza Ahmed Sulayman al Bahlul (See “related profiles”), to be judged by a military commission. The bill of indictment registered counts of conspiracy with intent to commit war crimes which included attacks against civilians, murder, wanton destruction of property and terrorism.

On 27 August 2004, his lawyer lodged a complaint saying that she did not have access to all of the documentation necessary for a professional defence of her client. Moreover, there was controversy as to whether the fact of providing logistic and financial support to a terrorist group could be qualified as a war crime.

On 9 November 2004, the proceedings against Al Qosi were officially suspended since the day beforehand a District Court had ruled that military commissions were in breach of the United States international obligations, under the 3rd Convention of Geneva of 1949. However, on 15 July 2005, a court of three judges reversed this decision on appeal, thus allowing the trial to be re-opened before the commission.

In July 2006, the United States Supreme Court found that the executive power did not have the right, by virtue of the USA Constitution, to create such a jurisdiction, as this prerogative belonged only to Congress.

On 17 October 2006, Congress adopted the Military Commissions Act which authorised the creation of military commissions in order to judge individuals suspected of war crimes.

On 9 February 2008, Al Qosi was officially charged before the jurisdiction now authorised by Congress. On 5 March 2008, the counts with which he had been indicted beforehand were confirmed.

If found guilty he risks a sentence of life imprisonment.

Context

Guantanamo Bay, officially the Joint Task Force Guantanamo (JTF-GTMO), is a detention facility situated on the US naval base in Guantánamo, Cuba. The prison was established in January 2002 as part of the US-led “war on terror”, an international campaign of military operations based on legal and policy reforms introduced by the administration of President George W. Bush following the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001.

The detention centre’s purpose is to interrogate and prosecute alleged dangerous individuals, suspected of involvement with terrorist groups. Yet, of the 779 total detainees, the majority was found to be non-combatants with no proven affiliation to al-Qaeda, the Taliban or other recognised terrorist organisations.

The legal basis for the establishment of Guantanamo Bay lays on the Joint Resolution 23, adopted by the US Congress in September 2001. It authorised then-President Bush to use “all necessary and appropriate force” against those allegedly responsible for the 9/11 attacks and to prevent future attacks.

Based on this national security justification, the Bush administration sought to exclude Guantanamo detainees from the protection of the US Constitution, arguing that it does not apply since the facility is located outside US territory. The US department of Defense (DOD) further argued that the Geneva Conventions was not applying to Guantanamo Bay, and fighters for non-State terrorist entities, such as al-Qaeda, should be considered as “unlawful enemy combatants” rather than prisoners of war for the purposes of the third Geneva Convention. Thus they were excluded from the protections provided by that treaty. Stripped of basic legal and procedural rights, prisoners are detained indefinitely without trial and charge or tried by military commission.

However, in its 28 June 2004 decision in the Hamdi v. Rumsfeld case, the US Supreme Court upheld the detainees’ right to challenge their “enemy combatant” status by means of a legal action called habeas corpus, which alleges unlawful detention or imprisonment. In response to the Supreme Court ruling, the Bush administration created Combatant Status Review Tribunals (CSRT), specialised military commissions aimed at determining the detainees’ status.

On 29 June 2006, in the Hamdan v. Rumsfeld decision, the Supreme Court found these procedures to be illegal under both federal military justice law and under the Geneva Conventions. The Court held that the Bush administration did not have the requisite authority to establish the CSR tribunals due to a lack of congressional authorisation.

In response to this decision, Congress passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA), which provided a federal law basis for the commissions and relieved all US federal courts of the authority to hear a habeas corpus writ filed by any “alien detained as an enemy combatant”. Yet, in Boumediene v. Bush, which was decided on 12 June 2008, the Supreme Court declared the MCA provisions relating to habeas corpus jurisdiction illegal and affirmed the detainees’ right to such actions under the US Constitution.

In addition to the aforementioned legal issues, Guantanamo Bay has been the subject of persistent allegations of torture and mistreatment of detainees since its establishment.

In December 2002, then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld authorised the use of so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques”, including stress positions, sleep deprivation, intimidation and humiliation, in US counterterrorism operations. Former Guantanamo commander Major General Geoffrey D. Miller, who was in control of the prison from 2002 to 2004, was allegedly tasked with implementing these techniques. Following an inspection of the facilities in June 2004, the ICRC submitted a confidential report to the US government, stating that these techniques amount to torture. After the report was leaked to the New York Times in November 2004, it was reported that the Bush administration had rejected the ICRC’s findings.

The allegations brought by detainees and human rights organisations were confirmed in 2009, when the US department of Justice (DOJ) released classified memoranda detailing the use of interrogation techniques. The so-called “Torture Memos”, drafted by Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Yoo and signed by Assistant Attorney General Jay S. Bybee in August 2002, assert the legality of such methods. Shortly after taking office in January 2009, President Barack Obama affirmed that the techniques in question constituted torture and prohibited all government agencies from relying on the memos. However, despite widespread condemnation from both US government officials and the international community, as of July 2016 there have been no prosecutions of persons involved in the memos’ creation, nor any of the CIA or DOD personnel that are alleged to have carried out such acts of torture.

President Obama called for the closure of Guantanamo Bay and the transfer or release of all detainees. However, strong opposition from Congress, particularly to the transfer of inmates to prisons on US soil, continuously thwarted the Obama administration’s attempts to terminate operations. Other issues complicating the facility’s closure include the trials of the remaining detainees, particularly those involving evidence that was gathered through the use of torture. At the end of July 2016, Guantanamo Bay remained operational, with 61 prisoners still being detained in the facilities.