Last Friday, a former Bosnian-Serb policeman, Darko Mrđa, was sentenced to 15 years in prisonby the Court (of BiH) for crimes against humanity. He was appearing for the murder of Said Sadić, who was abducted from his home in August 1992 and has since disappeared.

“You will not need your shoes anymore,” Darko Mrđa told Said Sadić when he came to his home in the village of Tukovi, before killing him two kilometers away. The disappearance of Said Sadić is one of 50 cases of enforced disappearances brought by TRIAL International before the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In two decisions issued by the Constitutional Court, in 2012 and 2013, local authorities were ordered to conduct thorough and comprehensive investigations into those enforced disappearances cases.

In 2016, as a result of those decisions, an indictment was raised against Darko Mrđa for one of the reported enforced disappearance cases, and he was arrested. Darko Mrđa had previously been sentenced to 17 years imprisonment by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) for participating in the killing of 200 civilians, and in the commission of inhumane acts (in the form of murder attempts) against 12 other civilians in Koricanske Stijene, Bosnia and Herzegovina, on 21 August 1992.

The conviction of Darko Mrđa for the murder of Said Sadić is great news for returnees and families of missing persons who felt intimidated by his return to Prijedor (his hometown). TRIAL International welcomes his condemnation as a major victory in the fight against impunity for crimes committed during the war.

Sarajevo, April 3, 2018 – Non-governmental organization TRIAL International welcomes the decision of the Constitutional Court of BiH on the violation of the right to property and the right to a fair trial of victims of war crimes regarding the order to pay costs of Attorney’s Offices in compensation proceedings.

At a session held on March 22, 2018, the Constitutional Court of BiH adopted S.A.’s appeal against the decisions of the Supreme Court of Republika Srpska and Banja Luka District Court regarding the costs of the proceedings. The Constitutional Court found that ordering the victim of wartime rape to pay the costs of Republika Srpska Attorney’s Office in a trial against this entity, aimed at achieving compensation for the harm she suffered was a disproportionate and excessive burden on the appellant. This was determined to be a violation of the right to property and the right to a fair trial as provided for in the Constitution of BiH and the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

S.A. was raped multiple times by the member of the Army of Republika Srpska in July of 1992. For the last eight years, TRIAL International has been providing free legal aid to the survivor which, in 2013, resulted in the conviction of the perpetrator before the Doboj District Court. After her compensation claim before the civil court in Banja Luka was rejected based on the statute of limitations and she was ordered to pay 3000 BAM of court fees, TRIAL International hired the lawyer Nedžla Šehić to represent her. This was a strategic case in protecting human rights of victims of war crimes and in March 2017 an appeal was submitted to the Constitutional Court of BiH resulting in the abovementioned decision.

This is a very significant step for the appellant, a victim of wartime sexual violence whom this decision directly relates to, as well as for other victims of war crimes who are in a similar situation. Now the responsibility lies with the ordinary courts in BiH, and we expect them to by implementing those standards finally take away the unacceptable and excessive burden from the victims of sexual violence, former camp detainees and families of missing persons.”, said Adrijana Hanušić Bećirović, Senior Legal Adviser at TRIAL International Office in BiH. 

She noted that, for a long time now, the victims of war crimes in BiH have been faced with a problem of certain local courts imposing high court fees to the survivors who had initiated compensation claims in civil proceeding but had them dismissed based on statute of limitations. Unfortunately, this contributes to further retraumatization of victims of war, who are oftentimes marginalized and deeply traumatized from the war. They live in a constant fear of having to pay the fees, which can often lead to suicidal thoughts.

For a long time, TRIAL International has been carrying out a series of strategic activities addressing the systemic problem victims of war have been facing. This includes publishing a legal analysis of the implications the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Cindrić and Bešlić v. Croatia might have on the imposition of court fees in BiH, sending out a joint letter to solve this issue on behalf of more than 40 civil society organizations and victims’ associations to all relevant institutions in BiH, and informing European and international bodies about the need to address this problem.

Civil society organizations protecting human rights in BiH unite to send a letter to relevant stakeholders. In this letter, the human rights defenders urge to find a solution regarding victims of war crimes compelled to pay court fees if their claims are dismissed.

Dear all,

We are addressing you on behalf of civil society organizations protecting human rights of citizens of BiH with a request to address and resolve the burning, systemic issue of charging victims of war crimes in BiH for court fees in ongoing and completed civil proceedings regarding compensation claims.[1]

Recently, the victims of war crimes in BiH have been facing problems when certain courts demand the survivors, who had initiated civil proceedings in order to receive compensation, pay high court fees when their claims are dismissed on statute of limitations grounds.

It is also important to note that different courts have held different views on this issue. Initially, in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina the courts had granted damages to the victims who had initiated the proceedings, in accordance with the official stance of the Supreme Court of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina from 2011 stating that statutes of limitations is not applicable on compensation claims. Only in the last two or three years has there been a change in the position of the Constitutional Court of BiH regarding statutes of limitations in lawsuits against the entities/state, which lead to a massive number of dismissed lawsuits and compensation claims before all courts. At the end of 2015, the Code of Civil Procedure of the Federation of BiH was amended allowing the public attorney’s office to charge fees on an attorney’s rate[2], which benefited the FBiH Attorney’s Office as they could start collecting fees.

Considering their vulnerable social status and, usually, very difficult financial situation, a large number of survivors of wartime sexual violence, detainees and other war victims cannot afford to pay even a part of these fees without compromising their and their families’ means of subsistence. As a result, they face executive procedures against them, in the form of confiscation of their movable property or part of their monthly income, if they have any. This further re-traumatizes the victims, who most often already live on the margins of society, making them, as they themselves have said, victims of the system.

After last year’s judgment in the case of Cindric and Beslic v. Croatia before The European Court of Human Rights, involving a similar issue that the applicants (also victims of war crimes) were facing, several judges in BiH, based on the arguments of the said case, started rejecting requests for court fees to be paid by the war victims. The judgment became final in January 2017 and in it the Court decided that, after their compensation claim is dismissed, the victims are not obligated to pay court fees to the state. We believe that the arguments presented by the European Court of Human Rights in this case can similarly be applied to compensation claim cases before the courts in BiH.

Unfortunately, there are few BiH examples of cases where the judgment Cindric and Beslic is applied, which is why the victims who have started civil proceedings are living with a constant fear of the results of the proceedings and the consequences they might have on them and their families.

We have to emphasize that the victims of war crimes were compelled to initiate civil proceedings due to the lack of systemic solutions in providing compensation for incurred damages, that is, due to the authorities’ failure to adopt the appropriate legal framework. Hence, we believe that it is morally unacceptable, after dismissing their claims, to further demand the victims be the ones to pay the enormous amounts to the entities and the state they sued, who are responsible for the great suffering and damage caused to the victims during the war.

There is no justification for this, especially considering the fact that the incurred costs of the entities’ Attorney’s Offices are reimbursed through special budgets, regardless of any additional charge.

Moreover, the Council of Europe’s Commissioner for Human Rights has also expressed deep concern over this problem in his report on Bosnia and Herzegovina published in November 2017[3]. He pointed out that, according to the Amnesty International report, in some cases fees can reach from 6,000 to 10,000 BAM. He recalled the above-mentioned the European Court of Human Rights judgment in which it is stated that “the imposition of a considerable financial burden after the conclusion of proceedings, such as an order to pay fees for the representation of the State according to the “loser pays” rule could well act as a restriction on the right to a court.”

In the light of all of the above, we ask of you to do as much as you can to find or help find a solution to the problem of charging a large number of victims of war crimes for court fees, including adopting appropriate acts relieving them of this obligation.

 

Thank you in advance.

 

Respectfully yours,

 

Civil society organisations:

 TRIAL International

Mreža za izgradnju mira

Vive Žene Tuzla

Fondacija lokalne demokratije

Medica Zenica

Fondacija Udružene žene Banja Luka

Udruženje „Vaša prava BiH“

Udruženje “Snaga žene” Tuzla

Udruženje građana “Budućnost” Modriča

Udruženje Centar za demokratiju i tranzicionu pravdu

Centar informativno-pravne pomoći Zvornik / CIPP Zvornik

Forum civilna mirovna služba (forum ZFD)

Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF)

Centar ženskih prava

Helsinški parlament građana Banja Luka

Sarajevski otvoreni centar

Asocijacija za demokratske inicijative

Inicijativa mladih za ljudska prava u BiH (YIHR BiH)

Fondacija CURE

Oštra Nula

Udruženje građana “Zašto ne”

Žene Ženama

Agencija za saradnju, edukaciju i razvoj (ACED)

Uduženje žena  “MOST” Višegrad

Hope and Homes for Children

 

Associations of war victims:

Savez udruženja logoraša HNK

Hrvatska udruga logoraša Domovinskog rata u BiH

Regionalni savez udruženja logoraša regije Banja Luka i pripadajuća udruženja

Regionalno udruženje logoraša Višegrad

Savez logoraša Zeničko-dobojskog kantona

Udruženje logoraša Novi Grad Sarajevo

Udruženje / Udruga logoraša općine Travnik

Udruženje logoraša Prozor-Rama

Udruženje / Udruga logoraša općine Vitez

Udruga-Udruženje logoraša Brčko

Općinsko Udruženje logoraša Sanski Most

Udruženje ratnih zarobljenika-logoraša opštine Modriča

HULDR BiH Ogranak Vareš

Udruženje Prijedorčanki Izvor

Udruženje žrtava i svjedoka genocida
Udruženje za pomoć žrtvama i preživjelim seksualnog nasilja u ratu Naš Glas Tuzla

Udruženje za pomoć žrtvama i preživjelim seksualnog nasilja u ratu ,,Suze,,

Udruženje Istina-Kalinovik 92

Udruženje porodica nestalih općine Ilijaš

Udruženje porodica nestalih općine Vogošća

 

[1] Notes – the letterwas sent to: the members of the Parliamentary Assembly of BiH, Parliament of FBiH, National Assembly of RS and Assembly of the Brčko District; the Council of Ministers of BiH; the Government of FBiH, the Government of RS; the Government of Brčko District; the Ministry of Justice of BiH;  Federal Ministry of Justice; Ministry of Justice of RS; the Judicial Commission of Brčko District; the Ministry of Human Rights and Refugees of BiH; The Institution of Human Rights Ombudsman/Ombudsmen of BiH; Delegation of the European Union to Bosnia and Herzegovina; OSCE Mission to BiH and Office of the High Representative.

[2] Provisions on expenses shall apply to the parties represented by the Public Attorney’s Office. In such cases, the costs of the litigation shall include the amount that could be granted to the party as the remuneration for attorney. (Official Gazette of FBiH, 98/15, as of 23 December 2015)

[3] Report by Nils Muižnieks, Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe following his visit to Bosnia and Herzegovina from 12 to 16 June 2017, CommDH(2017)28, 07 October 2017, point 35, available at://rm.coe.int/report-following-the-visit-to-bosnia-and-herzegovina-from-12-to-16-jun/16807642b1

In July 2009, TRIAL submitted a communication to the United Nations Human Rights Committee concerning the enforced disappearance of Fikret Prutina, which occurred in June 1992. TRIAL acts on behalf of Fatima Prutina, wife of the disappeared and member of the Association of Relatives of Missing Persons from Vogosca, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH).

On 4 May 1992, Fikret Prutina was arrested in Svrake (BiH) by the Serb army together with his wife and their sons Asmir (mentally disabled, then 16 years old) and Hasib (then 18 years old) and most of the inhabitants of the same village. They were all taken to a concentration camp known as Kasarna JNA in Semizovac. A few days later, Fatima Prutina, together with her son Asmir and other women and children, were freed. Fikret Prutina and his other son Hasib were kept prisoners and transferred to different concentration camps, where they were subjected to torture and forced labour. Fikret Prutina was last seen on 16 June 1992 in the concentration camp known as Planjina kuca, located in the municipality of Vogosca. His fate and whereabouts remain unknown since then. Hasib Prutina, who eye-witnessed all the mentioned events, was freed from the concentration camp one month later. To date, he suffers from severe post-traumatic stress due to the brutality he has been subjected to, as well as to the horrifying facts, including the ill-treatment and disappearance of his own father, he was forced to assist.

More than 17 years after the events, no serious investigation has yet been undertaken by BiH authorities in order to locate Mr. Prutina or his remains or to identify, prosecute and sanction those responsible. Mrs. Prutina has taken several steps to obtain information about her husband, through the police of Visoko and Vogosca, the State Commission for Tracing Missing Persons, the Sarajevo Cantonal Prosecutor’s Office, and the Red Cross Society of BiH. These initiatives have proved vain.

On 23 February 2006, the Constitutional Court of BiH, seized by several families of victims of Vogosca, declared a violation by BiH of the right not to be subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to respect for private and family life of the relatives of disappeared persons. Accordingly, the Court ordered the relevant domestic institutions to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of the disappeared people. On 16 November 2006, the Constitutional Court adopted another ruling, where it declared that the Council of Ministers of BiH, the government of the Republika Srpska, the government of the Federation of BiH and the government of the Brčko District of had failed to enforce its previous decision.

Since then, Mrs. Prutina has not received any information about her husband from the mentioned institutions.

Consequently, Fatima Prutina requests the Human Rights Committee:

The General Context

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict (1992-1995) in BiH and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance. Approximately 13,000 people remain disappeared to date.

The case of Fikret Prutina occurred in the context of a first wave of enforced disappearances and “ethnic cleansing” operations perpetrated by the Serb army in the spring and summer of 1992.

Notwithstanding the existence of strong evidences on the identity of those responsible for the enforced disappearance of Mr. Prutina and eye-witnesses of the events, to date no one has been convicted, prosecuted and sanctioned for the alleged crimes, thus fostering an overall climate of impunity. Up to this day, the families of men disappeared in Vogosca still have not received any information on the fate and whereabouts of their loved ones.

 

The decision

In March 2013, the Human Rights Committee communicated its decision (called “views” in the UN language). The Committee held that Bosnia-Herzegovina violated Article 2.3 in conjunction with Article 6, 7 and 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights with regards to the author and her disappeared husband.

The Committee requested Bosnia-Herzegovina to continue the efforts to establish the fate and whereabouts of Fikret Prutina as required by the Missing Persons Act of 2004, to continue the efforts to bring to justice those responsible for his disappearance and to do so by 2015, as required by the National War Crimes Strategy, to abolish the obligation for family members to declare their missing relatives dead to benefit from social allowances and to ensure adequate compensation.

Moreover, the Committee insisted on Bosnia-Herzegovina’s obligation to prevent similar violations in the future and to ensure that investigations into allegations of enforced disappearances be accessible to the missing persons’ families.

 

The case

In September 2012, TRIAL submitted a communication to the UN Human Rights Committee concerning the alleged arbitrary killing and the subsequent removal and concealment of the remains of Mrs. Anđa Lale and Mrs. Staka Popović in the municipality of Trnovo in August 1992. TRIAL acts on behalf of Mr. Vide Lale and Mrs. Milojka Blagojević, who are respectively the son of Mrs. Anđa Lale and the daughter of Mrs. Staka Popović.

Following the Bosnian military attack against the town of Trnovo in mid-July 1992, Mrs. Anđa Lale and Mrs. Staka Popović, together with other six people, fled the town and reached the nearby village of Širokari seeking refuge in a weekend cottage they found empty in the village. On the 2nd August 1992, as they were setting out to have dinner in the weekend cottage in Širokari, Mr. Rajko Lale – another son of Mrs. Anđa Lale who was himself in the house – heard and saw dozens of Bosnian soldiers approaching. When Mr. Rajko Lale realised that the soldiers were about to reach and enter the house, he escaped through the window and hid in a bush very close to the cottage. He stayed in the bush all night, he was frightened and petrified and the only thing he could see was that the weekend house was set on fire by soldiers. He thought that all the persons had been burned inside the house. There was no trace of them in the cottage the following morning.

The fate and whereabouts of Mrs. Anđa Lale and Mrs. Staka Popović remain unknown since then and they are officially registered as ‘missing persons’ before domestic and international institutions. More than 20 years after the events, no investigation has been launched to establish what happened to Mrs. Anđa Lale and Mrs. Staka Popović nor to identify, judge and sanction those responsible for their alleged arbitrary killing and the subsequent removal and concealment of their remains.

Since 1992, Mr. Vide Lale and Mrs. Milojka Blagojević have been suffering from deep and severe psychological distress trying to cope with what has happened to their mothers, the lacerating uncertainty of their fate and whereabouts, the State’s attitude of indifference towards their plight and the absence of compensation or reparations. Moreover their family life was disrupted as a consequence of the arbitrary killing of their mothers and the subsequent concealment of their mortal remains, which have prevented the authors from burying their mothers in accordance with their religious customs and beliefs.

On 13 July 2005 the Constitutional Court of Bosnia-Herzegovina (BiH), seized by several families of missing persons, including Mr. Vide Lale and Mrs. Milojka Blagojević, declared that BiH violated the right not to be subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to respect for private and family life of the relatives of missing persons. Accordingly, the Court ordered the domestic institutions concerned to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of the missing people, including Mrs. Anđa Lale and Mrs. Staka Popović. To date, Mr. Vide Lale and Mrs. Milojka Blagojević have not received any relevant information about their mothers from the institutions concerned.

In September 2012, TRIAL therefore submitted an individual communication to the United Nations Human Rights Committee asking it:

 

The General Context

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict (1992-1995) in BiH and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance. Approximately 10,000 people remain missing to date.

The alleged arbitrary killing and the subsequent removal and concealment of the remains of Mrs. Anđa Lale and Mrs. Staka Popović took place in the context of the military operations between the Bosnian Serb Army and the Green Berets in the municipality of Trnovo during the summer 1992.

 

The Decision

On 17 March 2017 the UN Human Rights Committee issued a decision on the case, finding BiH responsible for the violation of several provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In particular, it declared a violation of the right to life and the right to an effective remedy with regard to Mrs. Lale and Mrs. Blagojević, due to the lack of information on their fate and whereabouts. Moreover, the Committee found that this entails a form of inhuman and degrading treatment for their relatives.

The Committee requested BiH to:

  • Intensify its investigation to establish the fate and whereabouts of Mrs. Lale and Mrs. Blagojević;
  • Bring to justice those responsible for the crimes committed against Mrs. Lale and Mrs. Blagojević;
  • Provide the relatives of Mrs. Lale and Mrs. Blagojević with adequate compensation and measures of satisfaction;
  • Provide the relatives of Lale and Mrs. Blagojević with the necessary psychological rehabilitation and medical care;
  • Prevent similar violations in the future and ensure that investigations into allegations of enforced disappearance and arbitrary executions are accessible to the families of victims.

BiH has now 180 days to inform the Committee about the measures taken to implement this decision.

 

The case

In March 2012, TRIAL submitted a communication to the UN Human Rights Committee concerning the enforced disappearance of Mr. Salih Dovadžija occurred in October 1992. TRIAL acts on behalf of Mrs. Sakiba Dovadžija and Ms. Dalisa Dovadžija, who are respectively the wife and the daughter of Mr. Salih Dovadžija.

On or around 10 August 1992, Mr. Salih Dovadžija was seen for the last time alive by his wife and his daughter (at the time 5-month old), while he was serving as a member of the Territorial Defence of the BiH Army. According to eye-witnesses, Mr. Salih Dovadžija was seen for the last time alive in October 1992 at the frontline in Žuč. He was held by members of the Bosnian Serb forces (VRS) in life-threatening circumstances, subjected to ill-treatment and forced labour. The fate and whereabouts of Mr. Salih Dovadžija remain unknown since then and he is officially registered as a missing person before domestic and international institutions. To date, no one has been judged and sanctioned for the enforced disappearance of Mr. Salih Dovadžija.

Almost 20 years after the events, no ex officio, prompt, impartial, thorough and independent investigation has been undertaken by BiH authorities to locate the mortal remains of Mr. Salih Dovadžija or to identify, prosecute and sanction those responsible for the mentioned crimes. Mrs. Sakiba Dovadžija and Ms. Dalisa Dovadžija have undertaken several steps to obtain information about their loved one.

Since 1992 Mrs. Sakiba Dovadžija and Ms. Dalisa Dovadžija are undergoing deep and severe psychological stress to try to cope with what has happened to their family and the lacerating uncertainty on the whereabouts of Mr. Salih Dovadžija. As a consequence of her precarious state of health, Mrs. Sakiba Dovadžija has been diagnosed and is being treated for “mixed dissociative conversion disorder”. In the case of Ms. Dalisa Dovadžija, who was a few months old when these tragic events took place, she was forced to grow up without her father and even in the impossibility to adequately mourn him. This situation has affected her whole family life.

On 16 July 2007, the Constitutional Court of BiH, seized by several families of missing persons, including Mrs. Sakiba Dovadžija, declared that BiH violated the right not to be subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to respect for private and family life of the relatives of missing persons.Accordingly, the Court ordered the domestic institutions concerned to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of the missing people, including Mr. Salih Dovadžija.

In March 2011, TRIAL therefore submitted an individual communication to the United Nations Human Rights Committee asking it:

 

The Decision

On 22 July 2015 the UN Human Rights Committee issued a decision on the case,finding BiH responsible for the violation of several provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, including the rights to life, personal liberty, and the prohibition of torture with regard to Mr. Salih Dovadžija. The Committee declared that the State is responsible for not providing information on the progress of the investigation into Mr. Dovadžija’s disappearance to his loved ones. The failure of the State to unveil the truth on Mr. Dovadžija’s fate and whereabouts exposed his wife and daughter to anguish and distress amounting to inhumane and degrading treatment.

The Committee requested BiH to:

In early 2016, the remains of Mr. Salih Dovadžija were found in Pale, near Sarajevo. In November 2016, his wife and daughter were finally able to bury him.

Since then, Ms Dovadžija has also been allowed a monthly pension.

 

The General Context

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict (1992-1995) in BiH and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance. Approximately 10,000 people remain missing to date.

To date no one has been convicted, prosecuted and sanctioned for the enforced disappearance of Mr. Salih Dovadžija, thus fostering an overall climate of impunity. Up to this day, Mrs. Sakiba Dovadžija and Ms. Dalisa Dovadžija have not received any information on whereabouts of the mortal remains of Mr. Salih Dovadžija and they have not had the possibility to mourn and bury him in accordance with their religious customs and beliefs.

 

The Facts

In December 2010, TRIAL submitted an application to theUnited Nations Human Rights Committee concerning the enforced disappearance of Fadil Ičić, on behalf of his mother, Mrs. Mevlida Ičić.

On 20 June 1992, when ethnic cleansing operations were taking place in Trnopolje (Bosnia and Herzegovina – BiH) and in the surrounding area, members of the Bosnian Serb forces arbitrarily deprived Fadil Ičić of his liberty as he was working in the field outside his house. He was taken to the concentration camp known as “Omarska”. In Omarska, Fadil Ičić and other men were living in inhumane conditions and they were frequently beaten and ill-treated. Fadil Ičić was last seen alive by another prisoner, in the hands of the guards of the concerntration camp. The fate and whereabouts of Fadil Ičić remain unknown since then.

Mrs. Mevlida Ičić lives in a lacerating situation of uncertainty, in spite of numerous attempts to establish the truth regarding the circumstances of the arbitrary deprivation of liberty, ill-treatment and enforced disappearance of Fadil Ičić, his fate and whereabouts and the progress and results of the investigations. Almost 18 years after the events, no ex officio, prompt, impartial, thorough and independent investigation has been carried out by BiH authorities and no one has been prosecuted, judged and sanctioned for the crimes concerned, thus fostering an ongoing climate of impunity. Although Mrs. Mevlida Ičić and the other members of the family have given their DNA samples to international mechanisms and national institutions dealing with the subject of missing persons, to date the mortal remains of Fadil Ičić have not been duly located, exhumed, identified and returned to the family.

Besides, Mrs. Mevlida Ičić has still not received integral reparation or compensation for the harm suffered by her and her son.

In March 2008 Mrs. Mevlida Ičić submitted an application to the Constitutional Court of BiH. On 13 May 2008 the Constitutional Court adopted a ruling on the case, finding a violation of various provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights because of the lack of information on the destiny of Fadil Ičić. Therefore it ordered the authorities to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of Fadil Ičić.

As of today, Mrs. Mevlida Ičić has still not received any information. Consequently TRIAL submitted an individual communication to the United Nation Human Rights Committee asking it:

to recognise that BiH violated numerous articles of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights subsequently to Fadil Ičić’s enforced disappearance;

to declare that BiH also violated the Covenant with regard to the suffering caused by Fadil Ičić’s mother owing to his disappearance;

to request that BiH undertake all necessary action to launch independent investigations as a matter of urgency with a view to locating Fadil Ičić and, in the event of his death, exhuming, identifying, respecting and returning his mortal remains to the authors;

to request that BiH undertake all necessary action to identify those responsible for his arbitrary deprivation of liberty, ill-treatment and subsequent enforced disappearance, judge and sanction them;

to request that BiH undertake all necessary action to guarantee that Mrs. Mevlida Ičić obtain without any further delay fair and adequate compensation and, in particular, access to medical and psychological care free of charge.

 

The Decision

On 30 March 2015 the UN Human Rights Committee issued a decision on the case, finding BiH responsible for the violation of several provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, including the rights to life, personal liberty, and the prohibition of torture with regard to Mr. Fadil Ičić. The Committee declared that the State is responsible for not providing information on the progress of the investigation into Mr. Ičić’s enforced disappearance to his loved ones. The failure of the State to unveil the truth on Mr. Ičić’s fate and whereabouts exposed his mother to anguish and distress amounting to inhumane and degrading treatment. Similarly, the fact that in order to obtain social allowances Mrs. Mevlida Ičić was forced to declare her missing son dead, while there was no certainty on his fate and whereabouts, constitutes inhumane and degrading treatment.

The Committee requested BiH to:

  • Establish the fate and whereabouts of Mr. Fadil Ičić;
  • Bring to justice without unnecessary delay those responsible for Mr. Ičić’s enforced disappearance;
  • Ensure that Mrs. Mevlida Ičić receives the necessary psychological rehabilitation and medical care, adequate compensation and appropriate measures of satisfaction;
  • Prevent similar violations in the future and ensure that investigations into allegations of enforced disappearance are accessible to the families of missing persons;
  • Amend the existing legal framework so that relatives of missing persons are not forced to obtain a certificate of death of the victim as a condition to receive social benefits.

BiH has now 180 days to inform the Committee about the measures taken to implement this decision.

 

The General Context

During the summer 1992, Bosnia and Herzegovina experienced the most violent phases of its history. The armed conflict between the Bosnian Serb forces and the Bosnian government forces generated the worst atrocities : operations of ethnic cleansing took place, concentration camps were set up and entire populations were forced to internally displace.

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict (1992-1995) in BiH and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance.

In 2010 the International Commission on Missing Persons (ICMP) and the International Committee of the Red Cross estimated that around 10,000 people remain disappeared in BiH.

 

In May 2010, TRIAL submitted a communication to the Human Rights Committeeconcerning 12 cases of enforced disappearance wich occured in June 1992 in Svrake village in Vogošća. TRIAL represents 25 relatives of the disappeared persons. The twelve victims are:

On 4 May 1992 these persons were deprived of their liberty in Svrake (BiH) by members of the army of the Republika Srpska (Vojska Republike Srpske – VRS) together with most of the inhabitants of the same village (approximately 850 people). A few days later, women, children and elderly persons were freed, while the men were taken to a concentration camp named “Nakina garaža”, where they stayed for almost 20 days. Afterwards, many prisoners were released and could go home under the condition to report twice a day to members of the VRS. After a few days, the place where they were supposed to report was changed and they had to report to the concentration camp known as “Planjina kuća”, located in the municipality of Vogošća, where they were also forced to sleep. While being held in the different concentration camps, the men were subjected to ill-treatment and forced labour.

Six of the victims (Himzo Hadžić, Safet odžić, Mensud Durić, Idriz Alić, Emin Jelečković and Hakija Kanđer) were last seen on 16 June 1992 in Planjina kuća, when they were taken away on a truck by Serb soldiers towards an unknown destination, together with other prisoners. Four other victims, Rasim Selimović, Abdulah Jelašković, Hasan Abaz and Esad Fejzović were last seen in the same concentration camp on 18 June 1992 when they were taken away in a truck towards an unknown destination by Serb soldiers with a group of other prisoners. After having witnessed the first group of men being taken away from Planjina kuća to an unknown destination on June 16 1992, Đemo Šehić, decided to escape towards a near village, which was under the control of the BiH army in order to save his life. Allegedly, he was also captured and arbitrarily executed by members of the Serb army. For his part, Sinan Salkić had been released on 14 May 1992, under the condition that he should report three times a day to Planjina kuća. On the morning of 10 June 1992 three or four men went to his house and arrested him without charge. Allegedly, he was arbitrarily executed by the same men on the bridge near the entrance of the village of Svrake and his body was thrown into the River Bosna.

The fate and whereabouts of the 12 mentioned men remain unknown since then.

Almost 18 years after the events, no ex officio, prompt, impartial, thorough and independent investigation has been undertaken by BiH authorities in order to locate the mentioned 12 men or their mortal remains or to identify, prosecute and sanction those responsible. The relatives of the disappeared people have taken several steps to obtain information about their loved ones, through the police in Visoko and Vogošća, the State Commission for Tracing Missing Persons, the Sarajevo Cantonal Prosecutor’s Office, and the Red Cross Society of BiH.To date, these initiatives have proved vain.

On 23 February 2006, the Constitutional Court of BiH judged that BiH has violated the right of the families of the missing persons not to be subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to respect their private and family life. Accordingly, the Court ordered the relevant domestic institutions to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of the disappeared people. On 16 November 2006, the Constitutional Court adopted another ruling, whereby it declared that the concerned authorities failed to enforce its previous decision. Nevertheless, the authors of the communication have not received any information about their loved ones from the mentioned institutions.

Having exhausted all domestic legal remedies, the 25 applicants request the Human Rights Committee:

The General Context

It is estimated that between 100.000 and 200.000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict (1992-1995) in BiH and that between 25000 an.d 30.000 were victims of enforced disappearance. Approximately 10,000 people are missing to date.

The cases of these victims occurred in the context of the first wave of enforced disappearances and “ethnic cleansing” operations perpetrated by the Serb army in the spring and summer of 1992.

 

The Decision

On 17 July 2014, the UN Human Rights Committee adopted its decision (called “views” in the UN jargon) on the case Selimović and others. The Committee found Bosnia and Herzegovina internationally responsible for the violation of several provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In particular, the Committee declared that the State is responsible for not having effectively investigated the arbitrary deprivation of liberty, ill-treatment and enforced disappearance of the 12 men, and also for having subjected the 25 applicants to inhumane and degrading treatment because it has not unveiled the truth about the fate and whereabouts of their loved ones. Moreover, the Committee affirmed that forcing relatives of disappeared persons to declare their family members dead in order to receive compensation constitutes an inhumane and degrading treatment.

The Committee requested Bosnia and Herzegovina to:

– Establish the fate and whereabouts of the 12 disappeared men;

– Bring to justice those responsible for the crimes concerned without unnecessary delay;

– Ensure that the applicants receive adequate compensation;

– Amend the existing legal framework to make sure that compensation for relatives of disappeared people is not conditioned upon obtaining a death certificate.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has now 180 days to inform the Committee about the measures taken to implement the decision.

 

In April 2010, TRIAL submitted a communication to the United Nations Human Rights Committee concerning the enforced disappearance and alleged arbitrary execution and the subsequent concealment of the mortal remains of Sejad Hero and Ramiz Kožljak occurred in July 1992.

On 4 July 1992 members of the Yugoslav National Army (Jugoslovenska Narodna Armija – JNA) surrounded the village of Tihovići and arbitrarily apprehended about 13 civilians, including Sejad Hero. Accordingly to eyewitnesses, the men were taken to a meadow in Tihovići where they were tortured and mutilated. Allegedly, they were afterwards arbitrarily executed by members of the JNA, who then set fire to the dead bodies and finally transferred the mortal remains to a nearby stream in Tihovići. The fate and whereabouts of Sejad Hero remain unknown since he was apprehended by members of the JNA and his mortal remains have not been located, identified and returned to the family for mourning and burial. After having learned about the massacre of the 13 men, in order to save his life Ramiz Kožljak decided to escape towards the nearby village of Vrapče, which was under the control of the BiH army. The whole area surrounding Vrapče was under the control of the JNA. Allegedly, Ramiz Kožljak was also captured and arbitrarily executed by members of the JNA. However, his mortal remains have not been located, exhumed, identified and returned to his family and his fate and whereabouts remain unknown since then.

More than 18 years after the events, no ex officio, prompt, impartial, thorough and independent investigation has been undertaken by BiH authorities to locate Sejad Hero and Ramiz Kožljak or their mortal remains or to identify, prosecute and sanction those responsible for the mentioned crimes. Tija Hero, Ermina Hero, Armin Hero, Emina Kožljak and Sinan Kožljak have taken several steps to obtain information about their loved ones, through, among others, the police of Visoko, Ilijza and Vogošća, the State Commission for Tracing Missing Persons, the Sarajevo Cantonal Prosecutor’s Office, and the Red Cross Society of BiH. To date, these initiatives have proved vain.  Tija Hero, Ermina Hero, Armin Hero, Emina Kožljak and Sinan Kožljak are all active members of the Association of Families of Missing People from Vogošća.

On 23 February 2006 the Constitutional Court of BiH, seized by several families of victims of enforced disappearance from Vogošća, including Mrs. Tija Hero and Mrs. Emina Kožljak declared a violation by BiH of the right not to be subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to respect for private and family life of the relatives of disappeared persons. Accordingly, the Court ordered the domestic institutions concerned to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of the disappeared people, including Sejad Hero and Ramiz Kožljak. On 16 November 2006 the Constitutional Court adopted another ruling, whereby it declared that the Council of Ministers of BiH, the government of the Republika Srpska, the government of the Federation of BiH and the government of the Brčko District of BiH failed to enforce its previous decision. Nevertheless, Tija Hero, Ermina Hero, Armin Hero, Emina Kožljak and Sinan Kožljak have not received any relevant information about their loved ones from the mentioned institutions.

Consequently, Tija Hero, Ermina Hero, Armin Hero, Emina Kožljak and Sinan Kožljak request the Human Rights Committee:

The General Context

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict (1992-1995) in BiH and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance. Approximately 10,000 people remain disappeared to date.

The cases of Sejad Hero and Ramiz Kožljak occurred in the context of a first wave of enforced disappearances and “ethnic cleansing” operations perpetrated by the Serb army in the spring and summer of 1992.

Notwithstanding the existence of strong evidences on the identity of those responsible for the enforced disappearance and alleged arbitrary execution and the subsequent concealment of the mortal remains of Sejad Hero and Ramiz Kožljak, to date no one has been convicted, prosecuted and sanctioned for the mentioned crimes, thus fostering an overall climate of impunity. Up to this day, the families of men disappeared and arbitrarily executed in Tihovići have not received any information on the fate and whereabouts of their loved ones and have not had the possibility to mourn and bury their relatives in accordance with their religious customs and beliefs

 

The Decisions

The UN Human Rights Committee dealt with the cases separately. On 28 October 2014, it adopted two decisions respectively on the case of Mr. Sejad Hero and Ramiz Kožljak. The Committee found Bosnia and Herzegovina internationally responsible for the violation of several provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, including the rights to life and personal liberty and the prohibition of torture. In particular, the Committee declared that the State is responsible for not having effectively investigated the arbitrary deprivation of liberty, ill-treatment, and enforced disappearance of Mr. Sejad Hero and Ramiz Kožljak, and also for having subjected their relatives to inhumane and degrading treatment because it has not unveiled the truth about their fate and whereabouts. Moreover, the Committee affirmed that forcing relatives of disappeared persons to declare their family members dead in order to receive compensation constitutes an inhumane and degrading treatment.

The Committee requested Bosnia and Herzegovina to:

– Establish the fate and whereabouts of Mr. Sejad Hero and Ramiz Kožljak;

– Make sure that its investigators contact the applicants as soon as possible to gather the information they can contribute to the investigation, and bring to justice those responsible for the crimes concerned without unnecessary delay;

– Ensure that the applicants receive adequate compensation;

– Amend the existing legal framework to make sure that compensation for relatives of disappeared people is not conditioned upon obtaining a death certificate.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has now 180 days to inform the Committee about the measures taken to implement the decisions.

 

 

In January 2010, TRIAL submitted a communication to theHuman Rights Committee concerning the enforced disappearance of Ibrahim Durić occurred in May 1992. TRIAL acts on behalf of Nevzeta Durić and of NedžadDurić, respectively mother and brother of Ibrahim Durić.

On 14 May 1992 Ibrahim Durić was stopped and interrogated at a check point in Kasindolska Street held by members of the army of the Republika Srpska (VRS) in the suburban neighbourhood of Sarajevo known as Dobrinja. He was in his car together with a friend (Zelimir Vidović) and they were returning from Sarajevo’s Hospital, where they had taken a neighbour who had been heavily wounded in a shelling. That was the last time that Ibrahim Durić was seen alive. His fate and whereabouts remain unknown since then. After the war, Zelimir Vidović’s mortal remains were located, exhumed and identified in Ilidža, another suburban neighbourhood of Sarajevo that was under the control of the Serb army (VRS) during the conflict.

More than 18 years after the events, no ex officio, prompt, impartial, thorough and independent investigation has been undertaken by BiH authorities in order to locate Ibrahim Durić or his mortal remains or to identify, prosecute and sanction those responsible. Nevzeta Durić and Nedžad Durić have taken several steps to obtain information about their loved one, through domestic authorities (in particular, the police, the Red Cross of Sarajevo and the State Commission for Tracing Missing Persons) and international organizations (International Committee of the Red Cross). These initiatives have proved vain.

On 23 February 2006 the Constitutional Court of BiH, seized by several families of victims of enforced disappearance, including Nevzeta Durić declared a violation by BiH of the right not to be subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to respect for private and family life of the relatives of disappeared persons. Accordingly, the Court ordered the domestic institutions concerned to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of the disappeared people, including Ibrahim Durić. On 16 November 2006 the Constitutional Court adopted another ruling, whereby it declared that the Council of Ministers of BiH, the government of the Republika Srpska, the government of the Federation of BiH and the government of the Brčko District of BiH failed to enforce its previous decision. Nevertheless, NevzetaDurić and Nedžad Durić have not received any information about their loved one from the mentioned institutions.

Consequently, Nevzeta Durić and Nedžad Durić request the Human Rights Committee:

to find that Ibrahim Durić is victim of a violation of Article 2.3 (right to a remedy) in conjunction with Articles 6 (right to life), 7 (prohibition of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment), 9 (right to liberty and security of person), 10 (right to be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person) and 16 (right to be recognized as a person before the law) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, due to the ongoing failure of BiH authorities to conduct a prompt, impartial, independent and thorough investigation on his arbitrary deprivation of liberty and his subsequent enforced disappearance, in order to establish his fate and whereabouts, as well as to identify those responsible for these crimes and to prosecute, judge and sanction them;

to find that Nevzeta Durić and Nedžad Durić are themselves victims of a violation by BiH of Article 2.3 (right to a remedy) in conjunction with Article 7 (prohibition of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment) of the Covenant, because of the severe mental distress and anguish caused by Mr. Ibrahim Durić’s enforced disappearance and the ongoing lack of information about the cause and circumstances of Ibrahim Durić’s disappearance as well as on the progress and results of the investigations carried out by BiH authorities;

to request BiH to order independent investigations as a matter of urgency with a view to locating Ibrahim Durić and, if necessary, exhuming, identifying, respecting and returning his mortal remains;

to request BiH to bring the perpetrators of the arbitrary arrest and subsequent enforced disappearance of Ibrahim Durić before the competent civil authorities for prosecution, judgment and sanction without any further delay; and

to request BiH to ensure that Nevzeta Durić and Nedžad Durić obtain integral reparation and prompt, fair and adequate compensation for the harm suffered.

The General Context

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict (1992-1995) in BiH and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance. Approximately 13.000 people remain disappeared to date.

The case of Ibrahim Durić occurred in the context of a first wave of enforced disappearances and “ethnic cleansing” operations perpetrated by the Serb army in the spring and summer of 1992.

To date no one has been convicted, prosecuted and sanctioned for the arbitrary deprivation of liberty and subsequent enforced disappearance of Ibrahim Durić, thus fostering an overall climate of impunity. Up to this day, the family of Ibrahim Durić still has not received any information on the fate and whereabouts of their loved one.

 

The Decision

On 16 July 2014, the UN Human Rights Committee adopted its decision on the case of Mr. Ibrahim Durić. The Committee found Bosnia and Herzegovina internationally responsible for the violation of several provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In particular, the Committee declared that the State is responsible for not having effectively investigated the arbitrary deprivation of liberty, ill-treatment and enforced disappearance of Mr. Ibrahim Durić. Moreover, BiH subjected Mr. Durić’s mother and brother to inhumane and degrading treatment because it has not unveiled the truth about the fate and whereabouts of their loved one. The Committee reiterated that forcing relatives of disappeared persons to declare their family members dead in order to receive compensation constitutes a form of inhumane and degrading treatment.

The Committee requested Bosnia and Herzegovina to:

– Establish the fate and whereabouts of Mr. Ibrahim Durić;

– Bring to justice those responsible for the crimes concerned without unnecessary delay;

– Ensure that the applicants receive adequate compensation;

– Amend the existing legal framework to make sure that compensation for relatives of disappeared people is not conditioned upon obtaining a death certifica

 

In December 2009, TRIAL submitted a communication to the Human Rights Committee concerning the enforced disappearance of Salih Čekić which occurred in June 1992, acting on behalf of Ema Čekić,  Sanela Bašić, Sead Čekić and Samir Čekić who are respectively the wife, the daughter and the sons of  Salih Čekić.

On 4 May 1992 Salih Čekić was arrested in Svrake (Bosnia and Herzegovina, hereafter: BiH) by the Serb army together with Ema Čekić and their children Sanela Bašić (then 16 years old), Sead Čekić (then 15 years old) and Samir Čekić (then 13 years old) and most of the inhabitants of the same village. They were all taken to the concentration camp known as Kasarna JNA in Semizovac. A few days later, Ema Čekić, together with her children Sanela Bašić, Sead Čekić and Samir Čekić and other women and children, were freed. Salih Čekić was kept prisoner and transferred to different concentration camps, where he was subjected to torture and forced labour. Salih Čekić was last seen on 16 June 1992 in the concentration camp known asPlanjina kuca, located in the municipality of Vogošća. His fate and whereabouts remain unknown since then.

More than 17 years after the events, no ex officio, prompt, impartial, thorough and independent investigation has been undertaken by BiH authorities in order to locate Salih Čekić or his mortal remains or to identify, prosecute and sanction those responsible. Ema Čekić, Sanela Bašić, Sead Čekić and Samir Čekić have taken numerous steps to obtain information about their loved one, through the police of Visoko and Vogošća, the State Commission for Tracing Missing Persons, the Sarajevo Cantonal Prosecutor’s Office, and the Red Cross Society of BiH. To date, these initiatives have proved vain. Ema Čekić is the President of the Association of Families of Missing People from Vogošća while her children are active members of the same organization.

On 23 February 2006, the Constitutional Court of BiH, seized by several families of victims of enforced disappearance from Vogošća, declared that BiH had violated the right of the relatives of disappeared persons not to be subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment as well as their right to respect for their private and family life. Accordingly, the Court ordered the relevant domestic institutions to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of the disappeared people, including Salih Čekić. On 16 November 2006, the Constitutional Court adopted another ruling, whereby it declared that the Council of Ministers of BiH, the government of the Republika Srpska, the government of the Federation of BiH and the government of the Brčko District of BiH had failed to enforce its previous decision. Nevertheless,  Ema Čekić, Sanela Bašić, Sead Čekić and Samir Čekić have not still received any information about their loved one from the mentioned institutions.

Consequently, Ema Čekić, Sanela Bašić, Sead Čekić and Samir Čekić request the United Nations Human Rights Committee:

to find that Salih Čekić is a victim of a violation of Article 2.3 (right to a remedy) in conjunction with Articles 6 (right to life), 7 (prohibition of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment), 9 (right to liberty and security of person), 10 (right to be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person) and 16 (right to be recognized as a person before the law) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, due to the ongoing failure of BiH authorities to conduct anex officio, prompt, impartial, independent and thorough investigation on his arbitrary detention, ill-treatment and enforced disappearance, in order to establish his fate and whereabouts, as well as to identify those responsible for these crimes and to prosecute, judge and sanction them;

to find that Ema Čekić and her children Sanela, Sead and Samir are victims of a violation by BiH of Article 2.3 (right to a remedy) in conjunction with Article 7 (prohibition of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment) of the Covenant, because of the severe mental distress and anguish caused by the enforced disappearance of Mr. Salih Čekić and the ongoing lack of information about the cause and circumstances of their loved one’s disappearance as well as on the progress and results of the investigations carried out by BiH authorities; and that, in the case of Samir Čekić, until 17 August 1996, the mentioned provisions were violated in conjunction with Article 24.1 of the Covenant, as he was a minor (for their part, Sanela Bašić and Sead Čekić were minors when their father was subjected to enforced disappearance, but they attained the majority before BiH ratified the First Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, this explaining why a violation of Article 24.1 of the Covenant is not alleged in respect to them);

to request BiH to order independent investigations as a matter of urgency with a view to locate Salih Čekić and, if necessary, to exhume, identify, respect and return his mortal remains;

to request BiH to bring the perpetrators of the arbitrary arrest, ill-treatment and enforced disappearance of Salih Čekić before the competent civil authorities for prosecution, judgment and sanction without any further delay; and

to request BiH to ensure that Ema Čekić, Sanela Bašić, Sead Čekić and Samir Čekić obtain integral reparation and prompt, fair and adequate compensation for the harm suffered.

The General Context

According to sources, it is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict (1992-1995) in BiH and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance. Approximately 13,000 people remain disappeared to date.

The case of Salih Čekić occurred in the context of a first wave of enforced disappearances and “ethnic cleansing” operations perpetrated by the Serb army in the spring and summer of 1992.

Notwithstanding the existence of strong evidence about the identity of those responsible for the enforced disappearance of Mr. Salih Čekić and eye-witnesses of the events, to date no one has been convicted, prosecuted and sanctioned for the alleged crimes, thus fostering an overall climate of impunity. Up to this day, the families of men disappeared in Vogošća have not received any information on the fate and whereabouts of their loved ones.

 

The decision

In March 2013, the Human Rights Committee communicated its decision (called “views” in the UN language). The Committee held that Bosnia-Herzegovina violated Article 2.3 in conjunction with Article 6, 7 and 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights with regards to the authors and their disappeared relative. The Committee also found a violation of Article 24 of the Covenant with regard to Samir Čekić.

The Committee requested Bosnia-Herzegovina to continue the efforts to establish the fate and whereabouts of Salih Čekić as required by the Missing Persons Act of 2004, to continue the efforts to bring to justice those responsible for his disappearance and to do so by 2015, as required by the National War Crimes Strategy, to abolish the obligation for family members to declare their missing relatives dead to benefit from social allowances and to ensure adequate compensation.

Moreover, the Committee insisted on Bosnia-Herzegovina’s obligation to prevent similar violations in the future and to ensure that investigations into allegations of enforced disappearances be accessible to the missing persons’ families.

 

In November 2009, TRIAL submitted a communication to the Human Rights Committee concerning the enforced disappearance of Safet Kozica that occurred in June 1992. TRIAL acts on behalf of  Mirha Kozica, Bajazit Kozica and Selima Kozica, who are respectively mother, brother and sister of Mr. Safet Kozica.

On 4 May 1992, Safet Kozica was arrested in Svrake (BiH) by the Serb army together with Mirha Kozica and her husband Aziz Kozica and most of the inhabitants of the same village. They were all taken to the concentration camp known as Kasarna JNA in Semizovac. A few days later, Mirha Kozica, together with her husband Aziz Kozica and other women, elderly men and children, were freed. Safet Kozica was kept prisoner and transferred to different concentration camps, where he was subjected to torture and forced labour. Safet Kozica was last seen on 16 June 1992 in the concentration camp known as “Planjina kuca”, located in the municipality of Vogošća. His fate and whereabouts remain unknown since then.

More than 17 years after the events, no ex officio, prompt, impartial, thorough and independent investigation has been undertaken by BiH authorities in order to locate Safet Kozica or his mortal remains or to identify, prosecute and sanction those responsible. Mirha Kozica, Bajazit Kozica and Selima Kozica have taken numerous steps to obtain information about their loved one, through the police of Visoko and Vogošća, the State Commission for Tracing Missing Persons, the Sarajevo Cantonal Prosecutor’s Office, and the Red Cross Society of BiH. To date, these initiatives have proved vain. Mirha Kozica, Bajazit Kozica and Selima Kozica are active members of the Association of Families of Missing People from Vogošća.

In particular, Mirha Kozica is now 80 years old and she fears that she may die without having established the truth about what has happened to her son and having obtained justice and redress.

On 23 February 2006, the Constitutional Court of BiH, seized by several families of victims of enforced disappearance from Vogošća, declared a violation by BiH of the right not to be subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to respect for private and family life of the relatives of disappeared persons. Accordingly, the Court ordered the relevant domestic institutions to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of the disappeared people, including Safet Kozica. On 16 November 2006, the Constitutional Court adopted another ruling, whereby it declared that the Council of Ministers of BiH, the government of the Republika Srpska, the government of the Federation of BiH and the government of the Brčko District of BiH failed to enforce its previous decision. Nevertheless, Mirha Kozica, Bajazit Kozica and Selima Kozica have not received any information about their loved one from the mentioned institutions.

Consequently, Mirha Kozica, Bajazit Kozica and Selima Kozica request the Human Rights Committee:

to find that Safet Kozica is a victim of a violation of Article 2 § 3 (right to a remedy) in conjunction with Articles 6 (right to life), 7 (prohibition of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment), 9 (right to liberty and security of person), 10 (right to be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person) and 16 (right to be recognized as a person before the law) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, due to the ongoing failure of BiH authorities to conduct a prompt, impartial, independent and thorough investigation on his arbitrary detention, ill-treatment and enforced disappearance, in order to establish his fate and whereabouts, as well as to identify those responsible for these crimes and to prosecute, judge and sanction them;

to find that they are victims of a violation by BiH of Article 2 § 3 (right to a remedy) in conjunction with Article 7 (prohibition of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment) of the Covenant, because of the severe mental distress and anguish caused by the enforced disappearance of Safet Kozica and the ongoing lack of information about the cause and circumstances of their loved one’s disappearance as well as on the progress and results of the investigations carried out by BiH authorities;

to request BiH to order independent investigations as a matter of urgency with a view to locate Safet Kozica and, if necessary, to exhume, identify, respect and return his mortal remains;

to request BiH to bring the perpetrators of the arbitrary arrest, ill-treatment and enforced disappearance of Safet Kozica before the competent civil authorities for prosecution, judgment and sanction without any further delay; and

to request BiH to ensure that Mirha Kozica, Bajazit Kozica and Selima Kozica obtain integral reparation and prompt, fair and adequate compensation for the harm suffered.

The General Context

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict (1992-1995) in BiH and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance. Approximately 13,000 people remain disappeared to date.

The case of Safet Kozica occurred in the context of a first wave of enforced disappearances and “ethnic cleansing” operations perpetrated by the Serb army in the spring and summer of 1992.

Notwithstanding the existence of strong evidences on the identity of those responsible for the enforced disappearance of Safet Kozica and eye-witnesses of the events, to date no one has been convicted, prosecuted and sanctioned for the alleged crimes, thus fostering an overall climate of impunity. Up to this day, the families of men disappeared in Vogošća have not received any information on the fate and whereabouts of their loved ones.

 

The decision

In March 2013, the Human Rights Committee communicated its decision (called “views” in the UN language). The Committee held that Bosnia-Herzegovina violated Article 2.3 in conjunction with Article 6, 7 and 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights with regards to the authors and their disappeared relative.

The Committee requested Bosnia-Herzegovina to continue the efforts to establish the fate and whereabouts of Safet Kozica as required by the Missing Persons Act of 2004, to continue the efforts to bring to justice those responsible for his disappearance and to do so by 2015, as required by the National War Crimes Strategy, to abolish the obligation for family members to declare their missing relatives dead to benefit from social allowances and to ensure adequate compensation.

Moreover, the Committee insisted on Bosnia-Herzegovina’s obligation to prevent similar violations in the future and to ensure that investigations into allegations of enforced disappearances be accessible to the missing persons’ families.

 

August 2009, TRIAL submitted a communication to the United Nations Human Rights Committee concerning the enforced disappearance of Huso Zlatarac and Nedžad Zlatarac occurred in June 1992. TRIAL acts on behalf of Hasiba Zlatarac and Alma Čardaković, wife and daughter respectively of Huso Zlatarac and mother and sister respectively of Nedžad Zlatarac.

The case

On 4 May 1992, Huso Zlatarac was arrested in Svrake (BiH) by the Serb army together with Hasiba Zlatarac and their sons Nedžad and Alma (then 14 years old) and most of the inhabitants of the same village. They were all taken to the concentration camp known as Kasarna JNA in Semizovac. A few days later, Hasiba Zlatarac, together with her daughter Alma and other women and children, were freed. Huso Zlatarac and his son Nedžad were kept prisoners and transferred to different concentration camps, where they were subjected to torture and forced labour. Huso and Nedžad Zlatarac were last seen on 16 June 1992 in the concentration camp known as “Planjina kuca”, located in the municipality of Vogosca. Their fate and whereabouts remain unknown since then.

More than 17 years after the events, no ex officio, prompt, impartial, thorough and independent investigation has been undertaken by BiH authorities in order to locate Huso and Nedžad Zlatarac or their remains or to identify, prosecute and sanction those responsible. Mrs. Zlatarac has taken several steps to obtain information about her husband and son, through the police of Visoko and Vogosca, the State Commission for Tracing Missing Persons, the Sarajevo Cantonal Prosecutor’s Office, and the Red Cross Society of BiH. These initiatives have proved vain. Mrs. Čardaković has constantly supported her mother in the filing of complaints and in the searching activities in order to locate her father and brother. Both Hasiba Zlatarac and Alma Čardaković are active members of the Association of Families of Missing People from Vogosca.

On 23 February 2006, the Constitutional Court of BiH, seized by several families of victims of enforced disappearance from Vogosca, declared a violation by BiH of the right not to be subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to respect for private and family life of the relatives of disappeared persons. Accordingly, the Court ordered the relevant domestic institutions to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of the disappeared people, including Huso Zlatarac and Nedžad Zlatarac. On 16 November 2006, the Constitutional Court adopted another ruling, where it declared that the Council of Ministers of BiH, the government of the Republika Srpska, the government of the Federation of BiH and the government of the Brčko District of BiH failed to enforce its previous decision. Nevertheless, Hasiba Zlatarac and Alma Čardaković have not received any information about their loved ones from the mentioned institutions.

Consequently, Hasiba Zlatarac and Alma Čardaković request the Human Rights Committee:

 

The General Context

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict (1992-1995) in BiH and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance. Approximately 13,000 people remain disappeared to date.

The case of Huso Zlatarac and Nedžad Zlatarac occurred in the context of a first wave of enforced disappearances and “ethnic cleansing” operations perpetrated by the Serb army in the spring and summer of 1992.

Notwithstanding the existence of strong evidences on the identity of those responsible for the enforced disappearance of Huso and Nedžad Zlatarac and eye-witnesses of the events, to date no one has been convicted, prosecuted and sanctioned for the alleged crimes, thus fostering an overall climate of impunity. Up to this day, the families of men disappeared in Vogosca have not received any information on the fate and whereabouts of their loved ones.

 

The decision

In March 2013, the Human Rights Committee communicated its decision (called “views” in the UN language). The Committee held that Bosnia-Herzegovina violated Article 2.3 in conjunction with Article 6, 7 and 9 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights with regards to all of the authors and their disappeared relatives. The Committee also found a violation of Article 24 of the Covenant with regard to Alma Čardaković.

The Committee requested Bosnia-Herzegovina to continue the efforts to establish the fate and whereabouts of Huso and Nedžad Zlatarac as required by the Missing Persons Act of 2004, to continue the efforts to bring to justice those responsible for their disappearance and to do so by 2015, as required by the National War Crimes Strategy, to abolish the obligation for family members to declare their missing relatives dead to benefit from social allowances and to ensure adequate compensation.

Moreover, the Committee insisted on Bosnia-Herzegovina’s obligation to prevent similar violations in the future and to ensure that investigations into allegations of enforced disappearances be accessible to the missing persons’ families.

 

In July 2012 TRIAL submitted a collective application to the European Court of Human Rights concerning the enforced disappearance of 39 men whose fate and whereabouts remain unknown to date.

The application refers to events that took place within the armed conflict (1992-1995). In particular, the facts occurred in June 1992 in the barracks of the Yugoslav National Army (Jugoslovenska Narodna Armija – JNA) known as “Slaviša Vajner Čiča”, located in Lukavica.

These events must be read in the general context of the attack carried out between May and June 1992 by Serb forces on a number of villages and towns surrounding Sarajevo, including Hadžići.

TRIAL acts on behalf of 53 applicants, who are relatives of the 39 disappeared men. According to one of the 53 applicants in the case and direct witness of the events, on 22 June 1992, around 12 a.m., Mr. Alija Kardaš was called out from the room where prisoners were kept by an officer and he was taken away. The other prisoners heard the sound of gun-shots. The fate and whereabouts of Mr. Alija Kardaš remain unknown since then.

In the early morning of 23 June 1992 a member of the reserve structure of the Bosnian Serb forces (Vojska Republike Srpske – VRS), Mr. Vojo Vukotić, read a list containing 48 names. These detainees were subjected to torture and insults. They were last seen in life-threatening circumstances in the hands of their captors. Indeed, out of the mentioned 48 persons, 45 have never been seen again, while one was freed and survived; and in 2011 the mortal remains of other two persons were exhumed in a mass grave in Đurđevača, near Hadžići. Allegedly, the other disappeared men may have been taken to the Ravna Romanija Mountain and arbitrarily executed by soldiers at the orders of Mr. Tomo Kovač and Mr. Momo Mandić. Nevertheless, this information has not been investigated and corroborated to date by the authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH).

Over the past 20 years, the applicants in the present case have repeatedly reported the events, including the identity of some of the perpetrators, both before the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and domestic authorities (Commission for Exchange of Prisoners and Missing Persons, police, State Commission for Missing Persons, Prosecutor’s Office, Ministry of Interior, Missing Persons Institute) and international organizations present in BiH and working on the issue of missing persons (International Committee of the Red Cross, and the International Commission on Missing Persons), calling for a prompt, independent, impartial and thorough investigation.

Nevertheless, more than 20 years later, no one has been judged and sanctioned for the crimes concerned. Moreover, as mentioned, the fate and whereabouts of the 39 victims remain unknown and, in the unfortunately likely event of their death, their mortal remains have not been located, exhumed, identified and returned to the families. The latter cannot bury their loved ones and mourn them in accordance with their customs and beliefs. Furthermore, relatives have not received prompt, fair and adequate compensation and integral reparation for the harm suffered.

Given the state of impunity on the enforced disappearance of the 39 men from the Slaviša Vajner Čiča barracks on 22 and 23 June 1992 and the ongoing lack of information from BiH authorities on the fate and whereabouts of the men concerned, the relatives of the disappeared persons decided to bring complaints before the Constitutional Court of BiH.

On 23 February 2006 the Constitutional Court of BiH issued a decision on the case, whereby it found violations of various provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights, because of the lack of information on the destiny of, among others, the 39 men from the Slaviša Vajner Čiča barracks.

Accordingly, the Constitutional Court of BiH ordered the competent authorities to provide information to the applicants within a given deadline on the fate and whereabouts of their loved ones. Indeed, no decision was made on the issue of compensation, as the Constitutional Court of BiH deemed that it would have been solved with the establishment of the Fund for Support of Relatives of Missing Persons pursuant to the Law on Missing Persons (entered into force on 17 November 2004).

On 18 November 2006 the Constitutional Court of BiH adopted a ruling of non-implementation, where it declared that the Council of Ministers of BiH, the government of the Federation of BiH, and the government of the Brčko District failed to enforce the decision issued on 23 February 2006. In the same ruling it was also established that the government of the Republika Srpska failed to fully enforce the decision concerned. This ruling was delivered to the Prosecutor’s Office of BiH.

In fact, the non-implementation of Constitutional Court’s decisions is a criminal offence codified under Article 239 of the BiH Criminal Code.

Nevertheless, to date, no one has been judged and sanctioned for the non-implementation of the decision issued by the Constitutional Court of BiH on 23 February 2006.

Having seen all their efforts frustrated, the 53 applicants decided to turn to the European Court of Human Rights, requesting:

On 11 December 2014, the European Court of Human Rights, sitting in a single-judge formation, declared the application inadmissible, finding that the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the European Convention on Human Rights are not met. No further details on this decision were provided. The decision is final and is not subject to appeal.

General Context

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict in BiH during the period 1992-1995 and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance. As of today, between 8,000 and 10,000 people are still missing without trace. The enforced disappearance of the 39 victims in this case took place during the first wave of the “ethnic cleansing” operations perpetrated by the Serb army during the military attack on a number of villages and towns surrounding Sarajevo between May and June 1992.

 

Names of the persons

The names of the 39 disappeared persons are: Mr. Miralem Musić, Mr. Esad Murtić, Mr. Mehmed Karavdić, Mr. Fadil Nizić, Mr. Adem Beća, Mr. Salko Dželilović, Mr. Ćamil Ismić, Mr. Suad Hrgić, Mr. Midhat Hrgić, Mr. Edib Durmo, Mr. Enes Hrnjić, Mr. Zaim Musić, Mr. Suad Musić, Mr. Irfan Musić, Mr. Šefik Musić, Mr. Vahid Musić, Mr. Ćamil Tahirović, Mr. Adil Kadrić, Mr. Edin Kadrić, Mr. Ahmet Rizvo, Mr. Adnan Musić, Mr. Nijaz Čiko, Mr. Huso Murtić, Mr. Mujo Musić, Mr. Džemal Beća, Mr. Vezir Kahrica, Mr. Salem Kadrić, Mr. Sakib Altoka, Mr. Džafer Telarević, Mr. Alija Kardaš, Mr. Rasim Karavdić, Mr. Salih Dupovac, Mr. Aćif Alić, Mr. Osman Hasanović, Mr. Almir Oručević, Mr. Ismet Zekiri, Mr. Adil Musić, Mr. Ismail Mehdi, and Mr. Ibrahim Mehdi.

 

In June 2010, TRIAL submitted an individual complaint to the European Court of Human Rights against Bosnia-Herzegovina (BH) concerning the enforced disappearance of Esad Aliskovic which occurred in July 1992. In this case, ACT is acting on behalf of Refika Aliskovic, the wife of the victim.

On 20 July 1992, almost two months after the attack on the village of Prijidor (29-30 April 1992), the Serb army launched an attack against Rakovcani, a village located in the “Brdo” sector of the Prijedor municipality. At the time of the attack, the applicant was at home with her husband, their daughters, her brother-in-law and his wife. The two men were separated from their family and forced to join other men from the same village who had already been placed under arrest. The soldiers gave no information whatsoever to the applicant or to her sister-in-law concerning the reasons for arresting their husbands nor concerning the place where they were being held. Evidence from several witnesses given before the ICTY affirm that the men arrested in Brdo were taken to the Keraterm camp around 20-21 July 1992, and locked up in Room 3. On 24 July, the soldiers opened fire against these prisoners leaving very few survivors. An eyewitness indicated to Refika Aliskovic that on the eve of this massacre some twenty detainees, including her husband, were summoned and taken away to an unknown destination. Since then, no information has been made available as to the fate and whereabouts of Esad Aliskovic.

More than 18 years after this incident, no official, prompt, impartial, comprehensive and independent enquiry whatsoever has been undertaken by the BH authorities in order to locate, Esad Aliskovic or his mortal remains and return them to his family, nor has anyone yet been prosecuted, judged or punished for these crimes. Refika Aliskovic has taken several measures in order to obtain information concerning her husband including contact with various national authorities and institutions (notably, the Police and the Federal Commission for Disappeared Persons) and with international institutions, such as the International Commission on Missing Persons. As of today all of these initiatives have been in vain.

On 16 July 2007, the Constitutional Court of BH, ruling in an action brought by several families of victims of enforced disappearances from the Prijador region, held that BH was in violation of the right not to be subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to respect for private and family life of the families of those disappeared. Accordingly, the Court ordered the national institutions concerned to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of the missing persons, including that relating to Esad Aliskovic.

Following this decision, the office of the Republika Srpska Commission of Inquiry into Involuntary Disappearances addressed a letter to the applicant which simply stated that her husband had been added to the register of the Federal Commission for Disappeared Persons with a statement of desire on the part of the authorities to come to a resolution of the cases of missing persons. Until today’s date the applicant has received no new or additional information whatsoever from the authorities concerning her husband’s disappearance or of the measures being taken to locate the bodies of those missing. The BH authorities have therefore been remiss in implementing until now, a decision of the Constitutional Court and have provided absolutely no pertinent information either to the Court or the applicant.

Consequently, Refika Aliskovic has requested the European Court of Human Rights:

Procedure

After a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the application, on 28 September 2012 it was communicated to the Government of BiH.

In January 2013, REDRESS and the OMCT submitted to the ECHR an amicus curiae brief in relation with the present case to shed light on the link between enforced disappearance and the prohibition of torture and other ill-treatment as well as the relationship between the continuing nature of enforced disappearance and the content of effective remedy and reparation for relatives of those who have “been disappeared”.

In January 2013 the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina submitted its reply, challenging the admissibility and the merits of the case. On 25 March 2013, on behalf of the applicants, TRIAL submitted its pleadings to the European Court of Human Rights challenging in detail the arguments put forward by the respondent State and highlighting a number of mistakes and contraddictions contained in its submission to the European Court. The latter transmitted a copy of TRIAL’s reply to the Government, fixing 13 May 2013 as the deadline for comments they may wish to make. On 3 June 2014 the European Court issued a decision, finding that in this case Bosnian authorities did all that could be reasonably expected given the special circumstances prevailing in the country up until 2005 and the large number of war crimes pending before local courts. The Court noted that “it is evident that not all of the direct perpetrators of the many crimes committed within the context of the ethnic cleansing of the Prijedor area have been punished”. Nevertheless, it valued the fact that the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the State Court have convicted respectively 16 and 7 persons in connection with crimes committed in the area.

 

See also the Ramulic case where a loved one was also arbitrarily arrested on the same occasion

 

General Context

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict in BH during the period 1992-1995 and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance. As of today, between 10,000 and 13,000 people are still missing without trace.

The arbitrary arrest and enforced disappearance of Esad Aliskovic, took place during the first wave of the “ethnic cleansing” operations perpetrated by the Serb army during the military attack on Prijedor and the surrounding area in the spring and summer of 1992.

To date no one has been convicted, prosecuted and punished for the enforced disappearance of Esad Aliskovic, thus fostering an overall climate of impunity. The family of Esad Aliskovic has still not received any information on the fate and whereabouts of their loved one, nor an adequate and integral redress for the harm suffered.

 

oIn February 2010, TRIAL submitted an application to the European Court of Human Rights concerning the enforced disappearance of Emir Hodžić which occurred in May 1992. TRIAL acts on behalf of  Mersija Hodžić and of EmiraBiščević, respectively mother and sister of Emir Hodžić.

Almost one month after the take over of the city of Prijedor (29-30 April 1992), the Serb army attacked the nearby town of Kozarac. Mersija Hodžić and her husband left Kozarac to save their lives. After staying for two months in Prijedor, they reached Croatia and rejoined with their daughter Emira Biščević, who was already living there. Mersija Hodžić and Emira Biščević resided in Croatia until 1996 and 1997 respectively.

Emir Hodžić had remained in Kozarac as he was a reservist member of the local police. According to eye-testimonies, after the take over of Kozarac by the Serb army, all members of the local police, including Emir Hodžić, were captured by the Serb army. The majority of them were arbitrarily killed opposite the building of the primary school in Kozarac, while others were taken to concentration camps which had been set up in the region (e.g. Omarska). Emir Hodžić was seen for the last time on 26 May 1992 together with a group of colleagues, who later on were all captured and executed by members of the army of the Republika Srpska. His fate and whereabouts remain unknown since then.

Almost 18 years after the events no ex officio, prompt, impartial, thorough and independent investigation has been undertaken by BiH authorities to locate Emir Hodžićor his mortal remains or to identify, prosecute and sanction those responsible. Since when they were living in Croatia, Mersija Hodžić and Emira Biščević have taken several steps to obtain information about their loved one through international organizations and diplomatic channels. When they returned to BiH, they reported the enforced disappearance of Emir Hodžić to domestic authorities. These initiatives have proved vain.

On 16 July 2007 the Constitutional Court of BiH, seized by several relatives of victims of enforced disappearance from Prijedor and the surrounding area, declared a violation by BiH of the right not to be subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to respect for private and family life of the families of disappeared persons. Accordingly, the Court ordered the domestic institutions concerned to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of the disappeared people, including Emir Hodžić. So far, BiH authorities failed to implement the decision of the Constitutional Court and did not provide any relevant information to the Court or to Mersija Hodžić and Emira Biščević.

Consequently, Mersija Hodžić and Emira Biščević request the European Court of Human Rights:

to find that Emir Hodžić is a victim of a violation of the procedural aspects of Articles 2 (right to life), 3 (prohibition of torture) and 5 (right to liberty and security), in conjunction with Articles 1 (obligation to respect human rights) and 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the European Convention on Human Rights, due to the ongoing failure of BiH authorities to conduct an ex officio, prompt, impartial, independent and thorough investigation on his enforced disappearance in order to establish his fate and whereabouts, as well as to identify those responsible for these crimes and to prosecute, judge and sanction them;

to find that they are victims of a violation by BiH of Article 3 (prohibition of torture) in conjunction with Articles 1 (obligation to respect human rights), 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the Convention, because of the severe mental distress and anguish caused by Emir Hodžić’s enforced disappearance and the ongoing lack of information about the cause and circumstances of such disappearance as well as on the progress and results of the investigations carried out by BiH authorities;

to request BiH to order independent investigations as a matter of urgency with a view to locating Emir Hodžić and, if necessary, exhuming, identifying, respecting and returning to the family his mortal remains;

to request BiH to bring the perpetrators of the arbitrary arrest and subsequent enforced disappearance of Emir Hodžić before the competent civil authorities for prosecution, judgment and sanction without any further delay; and

to request BiH to ensure that Mersija Hodžić and Emira Biščević obtain integral reparation and prompt, fair and adequate compensation for the harm suffered.

Procedure

After a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the application, on 28 September 2012 it was communicated to the Government of BiH.

In January 2013, REDRESS and the OMCT submitted to the ECHR an amicus curiae brief in relation with the present case to shed light on the link between enforced disappearance and the prohibition of torture and other ill-treatment as well as the relationship between the continuing nature of enforced disappearance and the content of effective remedy and reparation for relatives of those who have “been disappeared”.

In January 2013 the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina submitted its reply, challenging the admissibility and the merits of the case. On 25 March 2013, on behalf of the applicants, TRIAL submitted its pleadings to the European Court of Human Rights challenging in detail the arguments put forward by the respondent State and highlighting a number of mistakes and contraddictions contained in its submission to the European Court. The latter transmitted a copy of TRIAL’s reply to the Government, fixing 13 May 2013 as the deadline for comments they may wish to make. On 3 June 2014 the European Court issued a decision, finding that in this case Bosnian authorities did all that could be reasonably expected given the special circumstances prevailing in the country up until 2005 and the large number of war crimes pending before local courts. The Court noted that “it is evident that not all of the direct perpetrators of the many crimes committed within the context of the ethnic cleansing of the Prijedor area have been punished”. Nevertheless, it valued the fact that the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the State Court have convicted respectively 16 and 7 persons in connection with crimes committed in the area.

 

The General Context

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict (1992-1995) in BiH and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance. Between 10,000 and 13,000 people remain disappeared to date.

The enforced disappearance of Emir Hodžić occurred as a part of the “ethnic cleansing” operations perpetrated by the Serb army in the context of the military attack of Prijedor and the surrounding area.

To date no one has been convicted, prosecuted and sanctioned for the enforced disappearance of Emir Hodžić, thus fostering an overall climate of impunity. Up to this day, the family of Emir Hodžić still has not received any information on the fate and whereabouts of their loved one, nor an adequate and integral redress for the harm suffered.

 

In June 2010, TRIAL submitted an individual complaint to the European Court of Human Rights against Bosnia-Herzegovina (BH) concerning the enforced disappearance of Enes Ramulic which occurred in July 1992. In this case, ACT is acting on behalf of Edin Ramulic, the brother of the victim.

At the time of his disappearance, Enes Ramulic was 22 years old and lived with his family in Rakovcani, a village in the municipality of Prijedor in today’s Republika Srpska.

On 22 July 1992, uniformed soldiers of the Yugoslav Army, entered the village and ordered all the men to assemble outside their homes. Obeying this summons, Edin Ramulic, Enes Ramulic and Uzeir Ramulic lined up in front of their house. Edin Ramulic who had lost a lot of weight and was very weak, appeared to the soldiers to be too young and was ordered back into the house.

Several witnesses have asserted that the men arrested in the village, including Enes and Uzeir Ramulic, were then escorted to the Keraterm concentration camp and interned in Room 3 where they were reportedly massacred on 24 July 1992. Fellow prisoners have stated that Uzeir Ramulic most likely was killed during the massacre but that his son, Enes, apparently survived. On 4 August 1992, he was seen for the last time, in very poor health, before being taken from the camp by bus the following day with around another 120 prisoners. A judgment handed down by the ICTY has confirmed the above facts and that all of the occupants of the bus were massacred. However the body of Enes Ramulic could not be identified amongst the dead bodies of the other passengers found at Hrastova Glavica, which lies approximately thirty kilometers from Prijidor.

More than 18 years after this incident, no official, prompt, impartial, comprehensive and independent enquiry whatsoever has been undertaken by the BH authorities in order to locate, identify and return the mortal remains of the victim to the family; nor has anyone yet been prosecuted, judged or punished for these crimes despite the great amount of energy devoted by the applicant in trying to shed light on these events.

On several occasions Edin Ramulic documented and submitted allegations concerning these events to the authorities including the Sanski Most police, the cantonal office of the Bihac Prosecutor, the Red Cross in Travnik and Zagreb, the Federal Commission for Disappeared Persons and the BH Institute for Disappeared Persons. Despite the futile outcome to date, Edin Ramulic has remained very active particularly through his participation in the work of the IZVOR association which lends support to the families of disappeared persons and through his personal research efforts which are facilitated due to his position as a journalist.

On 16 July 2007 the Constitutional Court of BH, ruling in an action brought by several families of victims of enforced disappearances from the Prijador region, which included Ramulic, held that BH was in violation of the right not to be subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to respect for private and family life of the families of those disappeared. Accordingly, the Court ordered the national institutions concerned to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of the missing persons, including that relating to the brother of Edin Ramulic.

On 22 March 2008, the applicant received a letter from the office of the Republika Srpska Commission of Inquiry into Involuntary Disappearances which simply acknowledged his request for information without providing any new or additional information whatsoever.

Confronted with such indifference on the part of the BH authorities concerned, Edin Ramulic requested the BH Constitutional Court, in a letter dated 30 March 2009, to take all necessary measures to ensure that its decision of 16 July 2007 be implemented. Up until this date this request has also gone unanswered.

Consequently, Edin Ramulic has requested the European Court of Human Rights:

Procedure

After a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the application, on 28 September 2012 it was communicated to the Government of BiH.

In January 2013, REDRESS and the OMCT submitted to the ECHR an amicus curiae brief in relation with the present case to shed light on the link between enforced disappearance and the prohibition of torture and other ill-treatment as well as the relationship between the continuing nature of enforced disappearance and the content of effective remedy and reparation for relatives of those who have “been disappeared”.

In January 2013 the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina submitted its reply, challenging the admissibility and the merits of the case. On 25 March 2013, on behalf of the applicants, TRIAL submitted its pleadings to the European Court of Human Rights challenging in detail the arguments put forward by the respondent State and highlighting a number of mistakes and contraddictions contained in its submission to the European Court. The latter transmitted a copy of TRIAL’s reply to the Government, fixing 13 May 2013 as the deadline for comments they may wish to make. On 3 June 2014 the European Court issued a decision, finding that in this case Bosnian authorities did all that could be reasonably expected given the special circumstances prevailing in the country up until 2005 and the large number of war crimes pending before local courts. The Court noted that “it is evident that not all of the direct perpetrators of the many crimes committed within the context of the ethnic cleansing of the Prijedor area have been punished”. Nevertheless, it valued the fact that the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the State Court have convicted respectively 16 and 7 persons in connection with crimes committed in the area.

 

See also the Aliskovic case where a loved one was also arbitrarily arrested on the same occasion.

 

General Context

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict in BH during the period 1992-1995 and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance. As of today, between 10,000 and 13,000 people are still missing without trace.

The arbitrary arrest and enforced disappearance of Uzeir and Enes Ramulic, the murder of the first and the enforced disappearance of the second, took place within the context of the “ethnic cleansing” operations perpetrated by the Serb army during the military attack on Prijedor and the surrounding area in the spring and summer of 1992.

To date no one has been convicted, prosecuted and punished for the enforced disappearance of Enes Ramulic, thus fostering an overall climate of impunity. The family of Enes Ramulic has still not received any information on the fate and whereabouts of their loved one, nor an adequate and integral redress for the harm suffered.

 

In November 2009, TRIAL submitted an application to theEuropean Court of Human Rights concerning the enforced disappearance of Nedžad Fazlić occurred in May 1992.  TRIAL acts on behalf of Fatima Fazlić, wife of  Nedžad Fazlić; and of Dženana Fazlić and Lejla Fazlić, daughters of Nedžad Fazlić.

Almost one month after the take over of the city of Prijedor (29-30 April 1992), the Serb army attacked the nearby town of Kozarac. Fatima Fazlić and her daughters Dženana and Lejla Fazlić (at that time respectively 8 years and 4 months old) had left Kozarac a few days before trying to save their lives. In June 1992 they reached Germany, where the brother of Fatima Fazlić was living. Nedžad Fazlić remained in Kozarac, as he was a member of the Territorial Defence Unit. According to eye-testimonies, after the take over of the town of Kozarac by the Serb army, Nedžad Fazlić escaped in the Kozara forest together with other men, trying to reach Croatia. On 28 May 1992 Nedžad Fazlić and a group of other men were arrested by members of the police of the Republika Srpska and taken to the police station of Aleksandrovac, near Gradiška: some detainees were subsequently taken to a concentration camp; while others, including Nedžad Fazlić, were taken to an unknown destination. That was the last time that Nedžad Fazlić was seen alive. His fate and whereabouts remain unknown since then.

More than 17 years after the events, no ex officio, prompt, impartial, thorough and independent investigation has been undertaken by BiH authorities in order to locate Nedžad Fazlić or his mortal remains or to identify, prosecute and sanction those responsible. Fatima Fazlić has taken several steps to obtain information about her husband, through domestic authorities (in particular, the Police in Sanski Most, the Commission on Missing Persons of the Federation of BiH and the Republika Srpska Office for Tracing Detained and Missing Persons) and international organizations (International Committee of the Red Cross and the Red Cross of Germany). These initiatives have proved vain.

On 16 July 2007 the Constitutional Court of BiH, seized by several relatives of victims of enforced disappearance from Prijedor and the surrounding area, declared a violation by BiH of the right not to be subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to respect for private and family life of the families of disappeared persons. Accordingly, the Court ordered the relevant domestic institutions to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of the disappeared people, including Nedžad Fazlić. So far, BiH authorities failed to implement the decision of the Constitutional Court and did not provide any relevant information to the Court or to Fatima Fazlić, Dženana Fazlić and Lejla Fazlić.

Consequently, Fatima Fazlić, Dženana Fazlić and Lejla Fazlić request the European Court of Human Rights:

to find that Nedžad Fazlić is a victim of a violation of the procedural aspects of Articles 2 (right to life), 3 (prohibition of torture) and 5 (right to liberty and security), in conjunction with Articles 1 (obligation to respect human rights) and 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the European Convention on Human Rights, due to the ongoing failure of BiH authorities to conduct an ex officio, prompt, impartial, independent and thorough investigation on his arbitrary detention and enforced disappearance in order to establish his fate and whereabouts, as well as to identify those responsible for these crimes and to prosecute, judge and sanction them;

to find that Fatima Fazlić, Dženana Fazlić et Lejla Fazlić are themselves  victims of a violation by BiH of Article 3 (prohibition of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment) in conjunction with Articles 1 (obligation to respect human rights), 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the Convention, because of the severe mental distress and anguish caused by Nedžad Fazlić’s enforced disappearance and the ongoing lack of information about the cause and circumstances of Nedžad Fazlić’s disappearance as well as on the progress and results of the investigations carried out by BiH authorities;

to request BiH to order independent investigations as a matter of urgency with a view to locating Nedžad Fazlić and, if necessary, exhuming, identifying, respecting and returning his mortal remains;

to request BiH, pursuant to Article 41 and Article 46.2 of the Convention, to indentify, indict, judge before the competent civil authorities and sanction those responsible of the arbitrary deprivation of liberty and subsequent enforced disappearance of Nedžad Fazlić, as well as the abettors and possible accessories after the facts; and to ensure that Fatima Fazlić, Dženana Fazlić and Lejla Fazlić have full access and capacity to act at all stages and in all instances of the said investigations and proceedings, in accordance with domestic law and the provisions of the European Convention.

to request BiH to publish the results of the investigations and the proceedings, so that BiH society is able to know the judicial determination of the facts and those responsible in this case;

to request BiH, pursuant to Article 41 and Article 46.2 of the Convention, to grant toFatima Fazlić, to Dženana Fazlić and to Lejla Fazlić adequate pecuniary compensation, covering both material and non-pecuniary damages;

to request BiH, pursuant to Article 41 and Article 46.2 of the Convention, to ensure that the measures adopted in favour of Fatima Fazlić, Dženana Fazlić and Lejla Fazlićprovide them with integral reparation that comprises restitution, rehabilitation, satisfaction (including restoration of dignity and reputation), and guarantees of non-repetition;

to request BiH to publish, in English and in Bosanski, relevant excerpts of the Court’s judgment (including the establishment of the facts, the findings of the Court and, if any, the attached opinions) in the Official Gazette and in another newspaper with widespread national circulation;

Procedure

After a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the application, on 28 September 2012 it was communicated to the Government of BiH.

In January 2013, REDRESS and the OMCT submitted to the ECHR an amicus curiae brief in relation with the present case to shed light on the link between enforced disappearance and the prohibition of torture and other ill-treatment as well as the relationship between the continuing nature of enforced disappearance and the content of effective remedy and reparation for relatives of those who have “been disappeared”.

In January 2013 the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina submitted its reply, challenging the admissibility and the merits of the case. On 25 March 2013, on behalf of the applicants, TRIAL submitted its pleadings to the European Court of Human Rights challenging in detail the arguments put forward by the respondent State and highlighting a number of mistakes and contraddictions contained in its submission to the European Court. The latter transmitted a copy of TRIAL’s reply to the Government, fixing 13 May 2013 as the deadline for comments they may wish to make. In the following months the European Court of Human Rights will adopt its judgment on the case.

On 3 June 2014 the European Court issued a decision, finding that in this case Bosnian authorities did all that could be reasonably expected given the special circumstances prevailing in the country up until 2005 and the large number of war crimes pending before local courts. The Court noted that “it is evident that not all of the direct perpetrators of the many crimes committed within the context of the ethnic cleansing of the Prijedor area have been punished”. Nevertheless, it valued the fact that the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the State Court have convicted respectively 16 and 7 persons in connection with crimes committed in the area.

 

The General Context

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict (1992-1995) in BiH and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance. Between 10,000 and 13,000 people remain disappeared to date.

The enforced disappearance of Nedžad Fazlić occurred as a part of the “ethnic cleansing” operations perpetrated by the Serb army in the context of the military attack of Prijedor and the surrounding area.

To date no one has been convicted, prosecuted and sanctioned for the arbitrary arrest and subsequent enforced disappearance of Nedžad Fazlić, thus fostering an overall climate of impunity. Up to this day, the family of Nedžad Fazlić still has not received any information on the fate and whereabouts of their loved one.

 

In November 2009, TRIAL submitted an application to theEuropean Court of Human Rights concerning the enforced disappearance of Edin Mahmuljin that occurred in June 1992, on behalf of Ismeta Mahmuljin and Muharem Mahmuljin, respectively mother and father of Edin Mahmuljin.

Almost one month after the takeover of the city of Prijedor (29-30 April 1992), the Serb army attacked the nearby town of Kozarac. On 24 May 1992 Ismeta Mahmuljin, together with her son Edin Mahmuljin, her daughter in law Saida Mahmuljin and her grandson Alen Mahmuljin (then 3-year old), fled to the forest of Kozara to seek refuge. Two days later, they decided to separate: while Edin Mahmuljin remained in the woods with other men, the rest of the family returned to Kozarac, where they were taken by the Serb army and transferred to the concentration camp of Trnopolje, from which they were freed about one month later. According to the testimony of other men who had remained in the Kozara forest together with Edin Mahmuljin, on 24 June 1992 the group was captured by members of the Serb army in a region between Bosanska Dubica and Bosanska Gradiška, in a place known as Sjeverovci. Some men were taken to the concentration camp of Omarska; while some others, including Edin Mahmuljin, were taken to an unknown destination. This is the last time that Edin Mahmuljin was seen alive and his fate and whereabouts remain unknown since then.

More than 17 years after the events, no ex officio, prompt, impartial, thorough and independent investigation has been undertaken by BiH authorities in order to locate Edin Mahmuljin or his mortal remains or to identify, prosecute and sanction those responsible. Ismeta Mahmuljin and Muharem Mahmuljin have taken numerous steps to obtain information about their son, through domestic authorities and national institutions (in particular, the police in Sanski Most, the Commission on Missing Persons of the Federation of BiH and the Red Cross of Republika Srpska) as well as through international organizations (International Committee of the Red Cross). These initiatives have so far proved vain.

On 16 July 2007 the Constitutional Court of BiH, seized by several relatives of victims of enforced disappearance from Prijedor and the surrounding area, declared a violation by BiH of the right not to be subjected to torture and inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to respect for private and family life of the families of disappeared persons. Accordingly, the Court ordered the competent domestic institutions to disclose all available information on the fate and whereabouts of the disappeared persons, including Edin Mahmuljin. So far, the Council of Ministers of BiH, the government of the Republika Srpska, the government of the Federation of BiH and the government of the Brčko District of BiH failed to enforce the decision of the Constitutional Court and Mrs. Ismeta Mahmuljin and Muharem Mahmuljin have not received any information about their son from the mentioned authorities.

Consequently, Ismeta Mahmuljin and Muharem Mahmuljin request the European Court of Human Rights:

to find that Edin Mahmuljin is victim of a violation of the procedural aspects of Articles 2 (right to life), 3 (prohibition of torture and inhuman treatments) and 5 (right to liberty and security), in conjunction with Articles 1 (obligation to respect human rights) and 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the European Convention on Human Rights, due to the ongoing failure of BiH authorities to conduct an ex officio, prompt, impartial, independent and thorough investigation on his arbitrary detention and subsequent enforced disappearance, in order to establish his fate and whereabouts, as well as to identify those responsible for these crimes and to prosecute, judge and sanction them;

to find that Ismeta Mahmuljin and Muharem Mahmuljin are themselves victims of a violation by BiH of Article 3 (prohibition of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment) in conjunction with Articles 1 (obligation to respect human rights), 8 (right to respect for private and family life) and 13 (right to an effective remedy) of the Convention, because of the severe mental distress and anguish caused by Edin Mahmuljin’s enforced disappearance and the ongoing lack of information about the cause and circumstances of Edin Mahmuljin’s disappearance as well as on the progress and results of the investigations carried out by BiH authorities;

to request BiH to order independent investigations as a matter of urgency with a view to locating Edin Mahmuljin and, if necessary, exhuming, identifying, respecting and returning his mortal remains;

to request BiH, pursuant to Article 41 and Article 46.2 of the Convention, to indentify, indict, judge before the competent civil authorities and sanction those responsible of the arbitrary deprivation of liberty and subsequent enforced disappearance of Edin Mahmuljin, as well as the abettors and possible accessories after the facts; and to ensure that Ismeta Mahmuljin and Muharem Mahmuljin have full access and capacity to act at all stages and in all instances of the said investigations and proceedings, in accordance with domestic law and the provisions of the European Convention;

to request BiH to publish the results of the investigations and the proceedings, so that BiH society is able to know the judicial determination of the facts and those responsible in this case;

to request BiH, pursuant to Article 41 and Article 46.2 of the Convention, to grant to Ismeta Mahmuljin and to Muharem Mahmuljin adequate pecuniary compensation, covering both material and non-pecuniary damages;

to request BiH, pursuant to Article 41 and Article 46.2 of the Convention, to ensure that the measures adopted in favour of Ismeta Mahmuljin and Muharem Mahmuljin provide them with integral reparation that comprises restitution, rehabilitation, satisfaction (including restoration of dignity and reputation), and guarantees of non-repetition;

to request BiH to publish, in English and in Bosanski, relevant excerpts of the Court’s judgment (including the establishment of the facts, the findings of the Court and, if any, the attached opinions) in the Official Gazette and in another newspaper with widespread national circulation;

Procedure

After a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the application, on 28 September 2012 it was communicated to the Government of BiH.

In January 2013, REDRESS and the OMCT submitted to the ECHR an amicus curiae brief in relation with the present case to shed light on the link between enforced disappearance and the prohibition of torture and other ill-treatment as well as the relationship between the continuing nature of enforced disappearance and the content of effective remedy and reparation for relatives of those who have “been disappeared”.

In January 2013 the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina submitted its reply, challenging the admissibility and the merits of the case. On 25 March 2013, on behalf of the applicants, TRIAL submitted its pleadings to the European Court of Human Rights challenging in detail the arguments put forward by the respondent State and highlighting a number of mistakes and contraddictions contained in its submission to the European Court. The latter transmitted a copy of TRIAL’s reply to the Government, fixing 13 May 2013 as the deadline for comments they may wish to make.

On 3 June 2014 the European Court issued a decision, finding that in this case Bosnian authorities did all that could be reasonably expected given the special circumstances prevailing in the country up until 2005 and the large number of war crimes pending before local courts. The Court noted that “it is evident that not all of the direct perpetrators of the many crimes committed within the context of the ethnic cleansing of the Prijedor area have been punished”. Nevertheless, it valued the fact that the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the State Court have convicted respectively 16 and 7 persons in connection with crimes committed in the area.

 

The General Context

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 200,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict (1992-1995) in BiH and that between 25,000 and 30,000 were victims of enforced disappearance. Between 10,000 and 13,000 people remain disappeared to date.

The enforced disappearance of Edin Mahmuljin occurred as a part of the “ethnic cleansing” operations perpetrated by the Serb army in the context of the military attack of Prijedor and the surrounding area.

To date no one has been convicted, prosecuted and sanctioned for the arbitrary deprivation of liberty and subsequent enforced disappearance of Edin Mahmuljin, thus fostering an overall climate of impunity. Up to this day, the family of Edin Mahmuljin still has not received any information on the fate and whereabouts of their loved one.

 

In September 2008, TRIAL lodged six individual applications before the European Court of Human rights in relation to the disappearance of eight Bosniak men during the massacre at Mount Vlasic, on behalf of their relatives.

The cases concern:

  • Edin Elezovic, 24
  • Emir Elezovic, 22
  • Fahrudin Mujkanovic, 29
  • Serif Bajric, 50
  • Zafir Bajric, 21
  • Zijad Huskanovic, 26
  • Fahrudin Elezovic, 45
  • Asmir Memic, 28.

These civilians were detained at the Trnopolje concentration camp, located ten kilometers away from Prijedor, in northwestern Bosnia and Herzegovina. On 21 August 1992, several buses arrived at the camp, organized by the Serb authorities to transport people out of Prijedor into Muslim-held territory and release them.

Late afternoon, the convoy stopped before reaching the line of separation between Bosnian Serb and Bosnian Muslim controlled territory. Over 200 men were then ordered out of the bus, and sent with other buses to the area of Koricanske Stijene, on Mount Vlasic. The rest of the convoy continued towards its initial destination.

The guards and soldiers commanded the 200 people to leave the buses, and to kneel down on the edge of a cliff. The men were then shot. Grenades were also thrown into the gorge, and wounded men at the bottom of the gorge were fired at. At least twelve men survived the massacre by falling of jumping from the cliff where the killing took place.

The exact fate of the other people, including Edin and Emir Elezovic, Fahrudin Mujkanovic, Serif and Zafir Bajric, Zijad Huskanovic, Fahrudin Elezovic and Asmir Memic, is to this day unclear. Their bodies have probably been buried in mass graves in various locations of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the aftermath of the massacre, but have never been found. More than 16 years after the event, no serious investigation has yet been undertaken by the authorities in order to locate the missing persons or bodies.

Families of missing persons have taken several steps to obtain information about their relatives, through the Federal Commission for Missing Persons of the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Office for Tracing Missing Persons of the Republika Srpska. These initiatives have proved vain. The only investigation that lead to a criminal conviction was led by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) against Darko Mrdja, who was sentenced to 17 years in prison.

On 16 July 2007, the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, seized by several families of victims, ordered all the relevant Bosnian institutions to provide them with all available information on the whereabouts of their missing relatives. This judgement proved useless, as the families still have not received any information about their family members from any of the institutions.

The authors of the complaints request the Court to recognize that the lack of effective investigation by the authorities leads to:

  • with regard to the disappeared persons: a continuing procedural violation of article 2 (right to life) and 5 (right to liberty and security) of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR)
  • a violation of article 13, due to the absence of investigation and effective remedy;
  • with regard to the families of the missing persons: a continuing substantive violation of articles 3 and 8 for the psychological distress suffered, as well as for the interference with their family life.

 

Procedure

After a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the application, on 28 September 2012 it was communicated to the Government of BiH.

In January 2013, REDRESS and the OMCT submitted to the ECHR an amicus curiae brief in relation with the present case to shed light on the link between enforced disappearance and the prohibition of torture and other ill-treatment as well as the relationship between the continuing nature of enforced disappearance and the content of effective remedy and reparation for relatives of those who have “been disappeared”.

In January 2013 the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina submitted its reply, challenging the admissibility and the merits of the case. On 25 March 2013, on behalf of the applicants, TRIAL submitted its pleadings to the European Court of Human Rights challenging in detail the arguments put forward by the respondent State and highlighting a number of mistakes and contraddictions contained in its submission to the European Court. The latter transmitted a copy of TRIAL’s reply to the Government, fixing 13 May 2013 as the deadline for comments they may wish to make.

On 3 June 2014 the European Court issued a decision, finding that in this case Bosnian authorities did all that could be reasonably expected given the special circumstances prevailing in the country up until 2005 and the large number of war crimes pending in local courts. The exhumation of the mortal remains of four of the applicants’ relatives was considered a significant achievement, as well as the identification of ten direct perpetrators by the State Court, the issuing of two international arrest warrants and the conviction of one perpetrator by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.

 

The general context

The massacre at Mount Vlasic took place at the beginning of the Bosnian war, within the framework of an ethnic cleansing campaign led by the armed forces and police of the Republika Srpska, following the dismantling of Yugoslavia.

It is estimated that between 100,000 and 20,000 persons died as a consequence of the conflict. Half of the 25,000 persons reported as missing in the aftermath of the conflict were found in various mass graves and identified. Approximately 13,000 persons are still missing.

Only one person was convicted by the ICTY in relation to the massacre of Koricanske Stijene. In May 2008, the Bosnian authorities eventually announced that four other persons had been arrested and would be prosecuted by national tribunals for this crime. Up to this day, the families of victims still have not received any information on the whereabouts of their relatives.