Today, TRIAL International, in collaboration with Civitas Maxima, the Center for Justice and Accountability (CJA), the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR), the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), and REDRESS, published the latest edition of the Universal Jurisdiction Annual Review (UJAR). UJAR 2025 compiles developments in 95 extraterritorial and universal jurisdiction cases prosecuted in 16 countries. The figures show that the upward trend in the use of universal jurisdiction to ensure accountability for international crimes continues, despite remaining challenges.

UJAR 2025_LinkedIn banner

 

Universal jurisdiction as a pillar in the fight against impunity

This eleventh edition of the UJAR testifies to the enduring role of extraterritorial and universal jurisdiction as a central pillar of the global fight against impunity. Notably, 36 new cases were opened or made public in 2024, and 27 suspects were convicted in first instance or on appeal, nearly double the number in 2023. Furthermore, Portugal joined the group of jurisdictions actively prosecuting international crimes committed abroad. Legal reforms on universal jurisdiction were adopted in Germany and Denmark in 2024, that respectively strengthened and enabled the investigation and prosecution of international crimes in the two countries.

Visual No1 with key figures from UJAR 2025 Visual No2 with key figures from UJAR 2025

The year also witnessed several positive developments in specific cases. In France, a Court of Appeal confirmed an arrest warrant against former Syrian president Bashar al-Assad. In two other cases related to the former Syrian regime, French judicial authorities confirmed that functional immunities do not apply in international crimes cases and entered convictions in absentia. These cases reflect the continued evolution of the legal framework around immunities and demonstrate that obstacles to accountability can be eroded through legal precedents. In Switzerland, Ousman Sonko, former minister of the interior of The Gambia, was convicted of crimes against humanity and sentenced to 20 years in prison, making him the highest-ranking State official tried under the principle of universal jurisdiction before a European court to date.

 

Challenges to the use of universal jurisdiction remain

At the same time, the report underscores some of the challenges faced in 2024. The failure to open investigations based on extraterritorial or universal jurisdiction into alleged international crimes committed in Gaza has been perceived as a major threat to the legitimacy of international criminal justice. Even in other situations, investigative efforts have yet to yield tangible results, such as in the case of crimes committed during Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and calls for accountability do not always translate into action, as has been the case for the documented crimes of the Belarusian regime.

 

Meeting the challenges

Despite these setbacks, the UJAR identifies several initiatives that States and their national prosecution authorities can implement to ensure that victims and survivors of international crimes have access to justice. An important first step is the strengthening of domestic legal frameworks to allow for and facilitate the prosecution of international crimes on the basis of universal jurisdiction. Increased training and resources for specialized international crimes units within domestic prosecution authorities are also essential.

The response to crimes committed in Syria demonstrates the importance of structural investigations and of the collaboration between civil society organizations – especially victims’ groups – and prosecuting authorities. The response to crimes committed in Ukraine following the full-scale invasion by Russia, demonstrates the potential of a coordinated, mobilized and cooperative international criminal justice. To ensure that victims and survivors have access to justice free from political bias, lessons learned from these responses can and should be applied across all regions affected by international crimes.

 

About the UJAR 2025

The UJAR 2025 was researched and written by UpRights. It has been produced with the financial support of the City of Geneva, the European Union, Oak Foundation, and the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy. The contents of the document are the sole responsibility of TRIAL International and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the positions of the above-mentioned donors.

The photograph shown on the publication’s cover was made by Bashar Taleb on 7 October 2023 in Gaza City.

 

Read and download the UJAR 2025:

UJAR 2025 cover

For this and previous editions of the UJAR, please click here.

For a more visual presentation of universal jurisdiction cases worldwide, please visit our interactive map UJIM.

TRIAL International, in collaboration with Civitas Maxima, the Center for Justice and Accountability (CJA), the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR), the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and REDRESS, published the 2024 edition of the Universal Jurisdiction Annual Review (UJAR) today. Now in its tenth edition, over the years, the UJAR has continued to showcase the increasingly important role of universal jurisdiction in the fight against impunity. With 36 new investigations opened in 2023 and 16 convictions, the past year confirms this positive trend.

Universal Jurisdiction Annual Review 2024

However, as noted in this year’s introductory article, the use of this crucial prosecuting tool is not expanding evenly across countries. Despite the incorporation of provisions related to international crimes in the legal frameworks of the majority of countries worldwide, only 13 domestic jurisdictions currently have open extraterritorial cases. As long as cases continue to be concentrated in a few specific jurisdictions, the truly universal nature and potential impact of universal jurisdiction will remain unexploited.

As highlighted in previous editions of the UJAR, the practice of universal jurisdiction faces numerous challenges. Civil society organizations’ (CSOs) litigation efforts have been instrumental to overcome these and allow for such an important expansion. In 2023, CSOs have been involved in legal proceedings in over 56% of the ongoing cases, by filing complaints, collaborating with or providing information to prosecuting authorities, providing support to the plaintiffs and participating as civil parties.

Thanks to the collaboration between CSOs and prosecution authorities, universal and extraterritorial jurisdiction has played a pivotal role in addressing crimes committed in Syria. The UJAR 2024 includes 49 cases underway in nine prosecuting countries for international crimes committed in Syria and bordering Iraq since 2011. Efforts to hold the Syrian regime accountable are not only numerous, but also significant considering the rank of the suspects targeted: in November 2023, the French war crimes unit issued an international arrest warrant against Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.

The past year has also shown the need for timely justice and the extent to which prolonged delays can hinder the likelihood of arrests, indictments and trials. This has been the case in the procedure, summarized in the review, against former Syrian vice-president Rifaat al-Assad, whose international arrest warrant was issued 10 years after the criminal complaint filed against him in Switzerland. Only a month before the warrant, he had ended his exile and returned to Syria, where the arm of justice will unlikely be long enough to reach him. In addition, protracted procedures bear the risk of “biological impunity” due to the advancing age, failing health and eventual death of suspects, witnesses and victims, when prosecutions are carried out decades after the crimes took place, as it recently happened in France, Germany and Switzerland.

About the UJAR 2024

The UJAR 2024 was authored by Shoshana Levy. It has been produced with the financial support of the City of Geneva, the European Union, Oak Foundation and the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy. The contents of the document are the sole responsibility of TRIAL International and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the above-mentioned donors.

Read and download the UJAR 2024:

Universal Jurisdiction Annual Review_cover image

You can see all the previous editions of the UJAR on our website.

On 14 July 2022, Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BDBiH) passed a law on civilian victims of war, with a groundbreaking innovation that legally recognises children born of wartime sexual violence (“children born of war”). This report analyses the importance of the law in comparison to previous foreign domestic and international efforts as well as other policies concerning children born of wartime rape.

Sarajevo, November 21th – Presentation of the report during a press conference titled ” What is justice for children born of war” © TRIAL International

Three conclusions are made. First, before Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), Norway and Colombia were the only states that recognised and compensated children born of war through law. The former had a brief, one-time payout programme in 2006, while the latter had delineated comprehensive legal rights in addition to reparations. This report compares the more extensive Colombian law with that of BDBiH, illustrating how the Colombian law is stronger by entitling these children to material reparations, whereas the BDBiH law only provides legal recognition without additional benefits. Nevertheless, BiH remains one of the very few states that have legally addressed a population so universally ostracised during and after armed conflict.

Second, besides Norway and Colombia, legislative recognition of children born of war is non-existent in other countries. Libya has committed to recognise a separate legal status for them via a ministerial decree, but this did not equate to legislation. Uganda has promised reparations via a national policy, but a law on reparations has not passed. Elsewhere, domestic courts (Bangladesh) and truth commissions (East Timor) have ordered governments to implement reparations for children born of war, but these have never manifested in law. Other countries (Iraq and Syria) have legislated to support survivors of sexual violence, but omit children born therefrom. This renders the BDBiH law a uniquely rare legal tool.

?  Ariq Hatibie analyses the BDBiH law in comparison to previous foreign domestic and international efforts to address the rights and needs of children born of war.

Third, the BDBiH law is the first to respond to very recent calls by the UN Secretary- General; the human rights treaty committees (CEDAW, CRC); model legislation written by the Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict; and precedents set by international courts, to protect children born of war. These bodies have emphasised that children born of war are a category of victims that has been unaddressed by states, imploring states to create legislation to recognise and address their rights, needs and the issue of stigmatisation. The BDBiH law answers these calls for national legal action.

The report was written by Ariq Hatibie, student at Harvard Law School

The work on this document was made possible thanks to support from the Government of Luxembourg and Rockefeller Brothers Fund.