Explore...
Explore TRIAL International’s news (cases updates, news releases, job offers, campaigns, newsletters). You can refine your search using our filtering system.
Refine Your Search
General Assembly 2024: Information and useful documents
22.04.2024 - (Last modified: 13.06.2024)
Members of TRIAL International are invited to participate in the General Assembly (GA) of the organization which will take place on June 13, starting at 6:30 p.m. in our office, located at 95 rue de Lyon in Geneva.
AGENDA
Meeting and discussion with Samuel Emonet, Executive Director of Justice Rapid Response (www.justicerapidresponse.org)
Approval of the agen...
Universal Jurisdiction Annual Review: Highlights in 2023
15.04.2024 - (Last modified: 16.04.2024)Policy brief: Victims' and Survivors' Rights in a Convention on the Prevention and Puni...
27.03.2024 - (Last modified: 03.06.2024)The fight against impunity does not require recourse to the death penalty
25.03.2024 - (Last modified: 06.05.2024)Recommendations for the investigation and prosecution of international crimes resulting...
21.03.2024
TRIAL International contributed to the ‘An Environmental Compact for Ukraine’ report titled ‘A Green Future: Recommendations for Accountability and Recovery’ published in February 2024.
Our recommendations include a number of strategic reflections regarding the investigation and prosecution through extraterritorial jurisdiction of international crimes resulting in...
Former Syrian Vice President Rifaat al-Assad will stand trial in Switzerland on charges...
12.03.20247 March 2024 – Day 17: Ousman Sonko addresses the Court
08.03.2024 - (Last modified: 08.01.2026)
In accordance with the procedural code, Ousman Sonko was given the opportunity to address the Court before it began its deliberations.
In particular, he stated in English that he regretted that the Court did not provide simultaneous interpretation of the closing arguments of the other parties, as he was not able to understand what had was argued.
For this re...
7 March 2024 – Day 17 continued: Rebuttal of the defense
08.03.2024 - (Last modified: 09.01.2026)
The defense argued that the Prosecutor had failed to make a distinction that was, however, quite clear from the record, but also from the work of the TRRC: on the one hand, there were the powers that were the sole responsibility of the President, namely the Gambian Armed Forces and consequently the Junglers that emerged from them, as well as the NIA. On the other hand...







