Denver, Colorado, USA 15 April 2025 – Today, a Denver jury found Michael Sang Correa guilty of five counts of torture and one count of conspiracy to commit torture. This verdict marks the first time a U.S. jury has ever held a non-U.S. citizen criminally responsible for torture committed outside of the United States.

Witnesses in front of the courthouse after the Correa trial Denver
Witnesses in the trial of Michael Correa and their legal representatives in front of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse in Denver, after the announcement of the decision of the jury on 15 April 2025 (photo: TRIAL International)

During the historic five-day trial, the jury heard evidence that Mr. Correa was a member of the Junglers, a notorious death squad in The Gambia. Victims and witnesses testified that following an attempted coup against former President Yahya Jammeh’s dictatorship in 2006, Mr. Correa and other Junglers brutally tortured suspected participants in the coup, including by beating them, suffocating them with plastic bags, and subjecting them to electric shocks. The jury unanimously found Mr. Correa guilty of torture and conspiracy to commit torture. Judge Christine M. Arguello, who presided over the trial, will determine Correa’s sentence at a hearing later this year. Mr. Correa can appeal the verdict.

Correa’s trial and conviction represent an important milestone towards justice for his direct victims, and it is another step towards justice for all who suffered under Jammeh’s regime,” said Tamsir Jasseh, who currently serves as a senior advisor to the Gambian Police. “This verdict demonstrates that we can end impunity for the widespread abuses that took place during those years, both abroad and in The Gambia,” said Demba Dem, a former member of The Gambia’s Parliament. “This verdict is crucial for the healing of the victims and of Gambian society,” said Yaya Darboe, a commanding officer in the Gambian Armed Forces. All three men testified about the torture they endured at the hands of Mr. Correa.

The case against Mr. Correa was brought under the extraterritorial Torture Act, a federal law which allows the U.S. government to prosecute individuals found within the United States for acts of torture committed abroad. The case has drawn significant attention from human rights advocates and legal experts, as it is the first trial of a non-U.S. citizen under the Act. Mr. Correa is only the third person to be convicted under the Act since its enactment in 1994.

“This is a momentous trial, not only for The Gambia, but also for the United States. Countries have an obligation to investigate and prosecute perpetrators of international crimes who are found within their territory,” said Ela Matthews, Center for Justice and Accountability Senior Staff Attorney. “By prosecuting Correa, the United States has shown its commitment to fulfilling these obligations.”

Victims and Gambian civil society played a crucial role in ensuring that Mr. Correa was brought to justice, and that the trial received coverage in The Gambia. Jammeh regime victims traveled from The Gambia to Denver to observe the proceedings and 11 people testified.

According to Vony Rambolamanana, Senior Legal Advisor at TRIAL International: “Correa’s conviction, together with the recent convictions of former Jungler Bai Lowe in Germany and Gambian former Interior Minister Ousman Sonko in Switzerland, underscores the critical importance of universal and extraterritorial jurisdiction laws in bringing justice to survivors of international crimes committed in countries where impunity is rampant.

In 2021, the Gambian Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission (TRRC) concluded that former president Jammeh and 69 of his associates, including Mr. Correa, committed crimes against humanity in The Gambia. The vast majority of perpetrators have yet to be held accountable. Last year, The Gambia took significant steps towards justice, including passing legislation aimed at creating a war crimes tribunal in the Gambia and securing ECOWAS’s approval to establish the tribunal.

Correa’s conviction is very significant in the quest for justice for victims of human rights violations, but many Junglers and other human rights abusers continue living in impunity. Some are even living freely in Banjul,” said Kadijatou Kuyateh, Press Relations Officer at the Alliance of Victim-Led Organisations. “The Gambia must act swiftly to establish its hybrid court to prosecute the remaining perpetrators identified in the TRRC report.

About the Center for Justice & Accountability

The Center for Justice and Accountability (CJA) is a San Francisco-based international human rights organization dedicated to working with communities impacted by torture, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other serious human rights abuses to seek truth, justice, and redress using innovative litigation and transitional justice strategies.

About the Alliance of Victim-Led Organisations (AVLO)

The Alliance of Victim-Led Organisations (AVLO) is a coalition of Gambian civil society organizations that has been championing and representing the interests of victims of human rights violations in The Gambia.

About TRIAL International

TRIAL International is an international NGO fighting impunity for international crimes such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, torture, enforced disappearances and conflict-related sexual violence. Founded in 2002, it has offices in Switzerland, Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

More Information

Read answers to Frequently Asked Questions here.

Or please contact:

  • Anja Härtwig, TRIAL International, in Geneva (English, French, German): media@trialinternational.org, +41 22 519 03 96
  • Ela Matthews, The Center for Justice and Accountability, in London (English): ematthews@cja.org, +44 78 627 28 939
  • Sirra Ndow, Alliance of Victim-Led Organisations, in Banjul (English): avlogambia@gmail.com, +2203737766

Denver, CO (United States) and Banjul (The Gambia), March 26, 2025 – Michael Sang Correa, an alleged member of a Gambian death squad, is scheduled to stand trial for torture starting on April 7, 2025. This marks the first time a non-U.S. citizen will stand trial in a U.S. federal court for torture committed abroad.

Chronology visual Michael Correa case US

Michael Sang Correa is charged with six counts of torture and one count of conspiracy to commit torture. He is allegedly a former member of the Junglers, a notorious death squad in The Gambia operating under former Gambian President Yahya Jammeh. The indictment alleges that following an attempted coup against Jammeh’s regime in 2006, Mr. Correa and other Junglers tortured suspected participants in the coup, including by beating them, suffocating them with plastic bags, and subjecting them to electric shocks.

The U.S. government filed the charges under the extraterritorial Torture Act, a criminal law which allows it to prosecute individuals found within the United States for acts of torture committed abroad. This case has drawn significant attention from human rights advocates and legal experts, as it is the first trial of a non-U.S. citizen since the Torture Act was passed in 1994, and only the third trial under the Act. A coalition of human rights organizations, including the Center for Justice and Accountability (CJA), member groups of the Alliance of Victim-Led Organizations (AVLO) and TRIAL International, played a crucial role in urging the United States to investigate allegations of international crimes attributed to Mr. Correa in The Gambia. CJA represents several of Mr. Correa’s alleged victims with co-counsel King and Spalding LLP.

The trial is a critical step towards securing truth and justice for victims of Jammeh’s dictatorship, which was characterized by widespread human rights violations, including enforced disappearances, torture, extrajudicial killings, sexual violence, and arbitrary detention.

The trial, initially scheduled for September 2024, will take place from April 7 to 18, 2025, at the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse in Denver. Additional information can also be found here.

 

About the Center for Justice & Accountability

The Center for Justice and Accountability (CJA) is a San Francisco-based international human rights organization dedicated to working with communities impacted by torture, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and other serious human rights abuses to seek truth, justice, and redress using innovative litigation and transitional justice strategies.

About the Alliance of Victim-Led Organisations (AVLO)

The Alliance of Victim-Led Organisations (AVLO) is a coalition of Gambian civil society organizations that has been championing and representing the interests of victims of human rights violations in The Gambia.

About TRIAL International

TRIAL International is an international NGO fighting impunity for international crimes such as genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, torture, enforced disappearances and conflict-related sexual violence. Founded in 2002, it has offices in Switzerland, Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

 

More Information

Read answers to Frequently Asked Questions here.

Or please contact:

  • Ela Matthews, The Center for Justice and Accountability, in London (English): ematthews@cja.org, +44 786 272 89 39
  • Sirra Ndow, Alliance of Victim-Led Organisations, in Banjul (English): avlogambia@gmail.com, +220 373 77 66
  • Anja Härtwig, TRIAL International, in Geneva (English, French, German): media@trialinternational.org, +41 22 519 03 96

The German Federal Court of Justice announced on November 29, 2024 that it had rejected the appeal of a former member of a Gambian death squad who was sentenced to life imprisonment a year ago for his participation in two murders and three attempted murders, constituting crimes against humanity. This was the first trial in history to be held under the principle of universal jurisdiction for international crimes committed under former Gambian President Yahya Jammeh.

Infographic depicting the chronology of the Bai Lowe case.

On November 30, 2023, Bai Lowe was convicted by the Higher Regional Court of Celle, Lower Saxony, of the attempted murder of lawyer Ousman Sillah in 2003, the murder of journalist Deyda Hydara and the attempted murder of two of his colleagues in 2004, and the murder of former soldier Dawda Nyassi in 2006. This was the first time that a court had recognized that crimes against humanity had been committed in The Gambia under the presidency of Yahya Jammeh, all thanks to the exercise of universal jurisdiction.

The defendant appealed to the Federal Court of Justice to examine whether the November 2023 conviction had been handed down in accordance with the law, and the Court found “no error of law prejudicial to the defendant”. In its decision of November 12, 2024, it therefore upheld the conviction, which is now final. “This decision shows that in Germany, even complex crimes committed abroad can be solved and brought to trial. It underlines the importance of the German International Criminal Code for the prosecution of the most serious crimes against human rights“, commented Peer Stolle, lawyer for one of the plaintiffs.

This conviction and its confirmation mark a turning point in the fight against impunity for atrocities committed under the presidency of Yahya Jammeh, who was in power in The Gambia between 1994 and 2016. The German proceedings have confirmed the existence of systematic and widespread attacks against the civilian population, orchestrated by Jammeh to maintain himself in power through violence. These decisions are therefore of major significance, not only for the four plaintiffs in the trial, but also for all the victims and survivors of the crimes committed under this regime. The Bai Lowe trial exposed one of the notorious tools of this repression: the role of the “Junglers”, a paramilitary unit created by the former President to suppress all forms of opposition.

“The confirmation of Bai Lowe’s conviction by the German Supreme Court is an important step in ongoing and future criminal prosecutions against the senior officials and principals of these crimes abroad, particularly in Switzerland and the United States, but especially in The Gambia,” commented Babaka Tracy Mputu, Legal Advisor at TRIAL International. TRIAL International and its partner ECCHR had informed the German Federal Prosecutor’s Office in 2019 of Bai Lowe‘s presence on the territory. Following his arrest in Germany in 2021, TRIAL International passed on additional information to the German prosecuting authorities and provided logistical and psychological support to the plaintiffs during the trial.

In May 2024, the application of universal jurisdiction also enabled Switzerland to bring to trial and sentence in first instance former Gambian Interior Minister Ousman Sonko, Yahya Jammeh’s former right-hand man, also for crimes against humanity committed between 2000 and 2006, to 20 years imprisonment.[1] In April 2025, the trial of Michael Correa, another alleged former member of the Junglers, is due to open in Denver, USA. He was indicted in June 2020 for the torture of individuals suspected of plotting a coup d’état in 2006.

TRIAL International now hopes that, at its next meeting in December, the Conference of Heads of State and Government of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) will give a favorable opinion on the creation of a special international tribunal for The Gambia, so that the crimes of the Jammeh era can be judged as close as possible to where they were committed.

[1] The difference in sentences (life imprisonment for the executor of a principal and 20 years’ imprisonment for a former Minister of the Interior) can be explained by the peculiarities of the legal systems of the various countries implementing universal jurisdiction, in this case Germany and Switzerland. For an in-depth analysis of the laws and practices of several countries regarding the investigation and prosecution of crimes under universal jurisdiction, please consult our series of UJ law and practice briefing papers, published jointly with the Open Society Justice Initiative (OSJI).

(Banjul, Denver, Geneva, 12 September 2024) – The trial against Michael Sang Correa for torture allegedly committed in The Gambia, originally scheduled for 16 September 2024, has been postponed.

Last week, Correa’s defense lawyers filed two motions with the court. The motions explained that the defense wanted to present testimony from two witnesses to support the argument that Correa was under duress when he committed the acts of torture alleged in the indictment. According to the motions, the witnesses refused to travel to the United States unless the United States government provided them with immunity from prosecution. The United States declined to offer that immunity.

The first motion asked the court to dismiss the case against Correa, arguing that the government was not facilitating the attendance of these witnesses. On 10 September, the court denied the motion to dismiss the charges against him. The second motion asked the court to delay the trial to allow Correa’s attorneys to travel to The Gambia to record sworn testimony from the two witnesses.

On 11 September, the judge granted the second motion. She ruled that ensuring Correa the right to present witnesses for his defense was crucial to protecting his due process rights. Due process rights are guaranteed under international law and the United States Constitution: they provide reasonable opportunity for defendants such as Correa to defend themselves against criminal charges, allow for thorough examination of the facts, and contribute to a fair and just legal process.

The trial will be rescheduled to a date in 2025.

For media enquiries:
Rebecca-Paris Senior, The Center for Justice and Accountability, in Geneva (English, French, Italian): rpsenior@cja.org

Frequently asked questions and answers

 

1. Who is Michael Correa and what are the charges against him?

Michael Correa, a Gambian citizen, will stand trial in September 2024 for allegedly torturing people in The Gambia in 2006. He is accused of being part of the “Junglers”, a death squad that committed human rights abuses at the direction of former President Yahya Jammeh.

In 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice charged Correa with torture and conspiracy to commit the torture of at least six people. The indictment alleges that Correa and other Junglers beat their victims, put plastic bags over their heads, and used electric shocks while they were interrogated, causing victims severe pain and suffering.

2. What is the status of the case against Correa?

Correa was first arrested in September 2019 for staying in the U.S. after his visa expired and was detained in a U.S. prison. In June 2020, he was indicted for torture and conspiracy to commit torture. He remains in prison while awaiting trial.

The next step in Correa’s case is the trial for torture charges. During the trial, the jury will listen to the evidence, including witness testimony, and it will hear arguments from lawyers for the U.S. government and for Correa. Then, the jury will decide whether or not Correa is guilty.

3. When and where will Correa’s trial take place?

Correa’s trial will take place in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado in Denver, where Correa was initially found and arrested. The trial is scheduled to take place between September 16 to 27, 2024. While criminal trials in the U.S. are typically open to the public, a judge may grant a request to restrict public access under exceptional circumstances, such as to protect the safety of a witness.

4. How is “torture” defined under U.S. law?

Correa has been charged under the Torture Act, which allows the U.S. to prosecute individuals within its territory for acts of torture committed outside its borders. This law defines “torture” as an act committed by a public official or person acting in an official capacity that is intended to cause severe physical or mental pain or suffering to a person in the perpetrator’s control.

5. What will happen at trial?

At trial, lawyers for the prosecution and defense will present evidence and arguments to a jury. The prosecution might ask victims to testify at the trial. After hearing the evidence, the jury will decide whether it finds Correa guilty of each charge or not. For Correa to be found guilty, the jury must find that he is responsible for the acts alleged “beyond a reasonable doubt.” The jury’s decision to convict must be unanimous, meaning that all the members of the jury must vote to find Correa guilty to convict him of the charged crime. The jury could find Correa guilty on all or only some of the seven charges of torture and conspiracy to commit torture.

6. What is the jury and how is it chosen?

The jury is made up of 12 U.S. citizens who are over 18 years old, reside in Colorado, and understand English. These 12 jurors will be selected out of a pool of prospective jurors. The pool is chosen at random from members of the general public who fulfill the requirements to be jurors. Before trial, Correa’s lawyers and the prosecutors may have the opportunity to ask each prospective juror questions. During jury selection, the prosecutors and Correa’s lawyers can ask to remove prospective jurors from the pool. This process continues until the 12 jurors and their alternates are selected.

7. Will Correa be required to testify about his crimes?

Under U.S. law, criminal defendants such as Correa cannot be forced to testify. While he is not required to testify, he can choose to testify in his own defense, but if he does so, he can be cross-examined by the prosecution.

8. What role will victims and survivors play in the trial?

In the U.S., a common law country, victims and survivors do not have a role comparable to civil parties in Civil Law countries. However, the prosecutor may call some of the alleged victims to voluntarily testify as witnesses.

Under certain conditions, the Crime Victims’ Rights Act gives victims the right to timely notice about developments in the case, and the “right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding.”

9. What happens if Correa is found guilty?

If Correa is found guilty, the court will schedule a sentencing hearing, where a judge will decide his punishment. Sentencing hearings normally happen several weeks after the jury makes its decision. At the sentencing hearing, both the prosecution and the defense will present their arguments about what the appropriate sentence should be. Victims who meet legal requisites may also have an opportunity to present statements describing how Correa’s crimes affected them.

After this information has been submitted, the judge will decide Correa’s sentence. Correa could receive a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison for each count of torture and conspiracy to commit torture. If he is found guilty of all charges pending against him, Correa could face a total of up to 140 years in prison.

10. What happens if Correa is acquitted on all the charges?

One potential outcome is that the jury will find him not guilty of any of the charges. Because Correa does not have a valid U.S. visa anymore, he could remain in immigration detention while his immigration claims are decided. He could choose to return to The Gambia, be deported to The Gambia, or be allowed to remain in the U.S.

If Correa is acquitted on all the charges and his immigration claims are decided in his favor such that he can stay in the U.S., The Gambia could seek his extradition for prosecution for other alleged crimes.

11. Will Correa have an opportunity to appeal?

Yes. If Correa is found guilty, he could appeal for three reasons:

  1. there was misconduct during his trial;
  2. the judge made a mistake in handling the case; or
  3. the jury engaged in misconduct or made a mistake in their verdict.

However, the prosecution cannot appeal an acquittal by the jury.

12. If Correa receives a prison sentence, could he get parole or early release?

While we cannot predict whether Correa would receive early release in general, individuals convicted of federal crimes—like those that Correa has been charged with—are not eligible for parole. However, there are a few circumstances that allow for individuals convicted of federal crimes to be released early.

First, individuals convicted with federal crimes receive credit for time that they spent in prison before their conviction. Accordingly, some of the time he has spent in detention since his arrest in 2019 may be deducted from Correa’s prison sentence. Correa would have been detained for at least five years by the time he is sentenced. The specific amount of credit Correa receives for “time served” would likely be decided when the judge announces the sentence.

Second, individuals convicted with federal crimes may have their sentences reduced by up to 15% for good behavior in prison.

Under extraordinary circumstances, individuals convicted with federal crimes sometimes qualify for compassionate release from prison. Compassionate release is rare. Some reasons for compassionate release are terminal or debilitating illness, the need to care for a child with no other guardian or incapacitated spouse, or worsening physical and mental health due to old age when the individual is over 65 years old (Correa would not be eligible for compassionate release due to old age until 2044). To qualify for compassionate release, the individual would need to show that he is no longer a danger to society.

13. Can Correa plead guilty and avoid the trial?

Yes, Correa can plead guilty at any point before or during trial. He can also try to negotiate a plea agreement with the prosecutor at any point before the jury reaches a verdict, although the prosecutor may decline to negotiate. Under a plea agreement, Correa would plead guilty in exchange for a compromise from the prosecutor, such as a shorter prison sentence than what he might have received at the end of a trial.

14. What was happening in The Gambia at the time of Correa’s alleged crimes?

During his 22-year dictatorship in The Gambia, Yahya Jammeh systemically oppressed any real or perceived opponents of his regime. The government targeted journalists; human rights defenders; lawyers; student movement leaders; religious leaders; members of the political opposition; judicial officials; members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) communities; and members of the security forces. These groups suffered terrible violations, including torture, extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, and sexual violence.

Many of these violations came to light during Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission (TRRC) hearings. The TRRC was established by the Gambian government 2018 to investigate abuses committed by the Jammeh regime. Three hundred and ninety-three (393) people, including victims, perpetrators, former government officials, and members of security forces, testified during 871 days of public hearings. The TRRC’s final report was made public on December 24, 2021, concluding that Jammeh and 69 of his associates, including Michael Correa, committed crimes against humanity. Jammeh is in exile in Equatorial Guinea, where he fled after losing the 2016 presidential election to Adama Barrow and failing at his attempt to not relinquish power despite the electoral results.

15. Who were the Junglers?

The Junglers were a death squad established by former President Jammeh in the 2000s, allegedly to suppress his regime’s opponents. The group reported directly to Jammeh and are alleged to have carried out widespread human rights violations, including enforced disappearances, torture, extrajudicial killing, sexual violence, and arbitrary detention. Some members of the Junglers have already confessed to committing torture and other serious human rights abuses.

16. Why has Correa only been charged for these acts of torture when he is also alleged to have committed other crimes?

In the U.S., prosecutors have the discretion to decide which cases they bring. In making these decisions, prosecutors consider a range of factors, including available resources and documentation. The prosecutor has not disclosed why they chose to prosecute these specific alleged acts of torture and not others.

The U.S. does not have legislation to prosecute many other crimes against humanity committed outside of its borders. This limits the type of charges that a prosecutor might bring. Correa’s case highlights the urgent need for the U.S. to pass legislation criminalizing crimes against humanity. Without this law, perpetrators who are in the United States could escape accountability for some or all of their crimes.

17. Why is Correa’s prosecution taking place in the U.S.?

The U.S. government has the legal authority to prosecute Correa for torture he allegedly committed outside of the U.S. because Correa is present in the United States. The extraterritorial Torture Act allows the U.S. to prosecute individuals found within U.S. territory, regardless of their citizenship, for torture committed outside of the country. This law operates as a form of universal jurisdiction.

This is only the third time a person has been tried under the Torture Act since the statute was passed in 1994. Two other individuals were convicted under this statute: Charles “Chuckie” Taylor, Jr., the son of former Liberian President Charles Taylor, was convicted in 2008, and Ross Roggio was convicted in May 2023. Correa is the first person who is not a U.S. citizen to stand trial under the Torture Act.

18. What is universal jurisdiction?

Universal jurisdiction is a legal principle that allows countries to prosecute crimes committed in other countries, regardless of the nationality of the suspect or victim. Universal jurisdiction cases support efforts to hold perpetrators of atrocities accountable and to bring justice to victims. They send a powerful message that human rights abusers will not find a safe haven anywhere in the world.

TRIAL International, CJA, and their partners publish the Universal Jurisdiction Annual Review (UJAR), which highlights universal jurisdiction cases in the U.S. and globally.

19. Are others being prosecuted under universal jurisdiction for crimes committed during the Jammeh era?

Michael Correa was the first person to be indicted outside of The Gambia for Jammeh-era crimes, but he is not the first to face trial. Another Jungler, Bai Lowe, was convicted in Germany and sentenced to life in prison in November 2023. Former Interior Minister Ousman Sonko was tried in Switzerland in early 2024 for crimes against humanity and was convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison in May 2024.

20. Could Jammeh and other senior officials be prosecuted in The Gambia?

As of the publication of this FAQ document, The Gambia has only prosecuted two Jammeh-era cases, against former minister of local government Yankuba Touray and former Director-General of the National Intelligence Agency Yankuba Badjie, who was convicted alongside four other ex-intelligence officials and a doctor who was found to have facilitated the officials’ crimes by forging a death certificate.

In December 2021, the TRRC issued its final report calling for the prosecution of those responsible for Jammeh-era crimes. On May 25, 2022, the Gambian government issued a White Paper accepting the TRRC’s recommendation. On May 12, 2023, the government presented an implementation plan for the TRRC recommendations. The implementation plan proposed a Special Prosecutor’s Office to investigate cases and a “hybrid” tribunal based on a treaty with the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). The court would prosecute the most serious Jammeh-era crimes. On April 23, 2024, The Gambian National Assembly passed bills establishing the Special Prosecutor’s Office and the Special Accountability Mechanism, offices which will be responsible for moving forward accountability for Jammeh-era crimes. In July 2024, the Parliament of ECOWAS decided to defer consideration of the creation of the special court until December 2024. These are promising steps forward for victims, survivors, and the rule of law in The Gambia. Given how long victims and Gambian society have been waiting, the government and ECOWAS should quickly establish the Mechanism.

21. What is the significance of this case in The Gambia and the U.S.?

In The Gambia and the U.S., Correa’s prosecution represents an important step for justice. The TRRC’s final report concluded that Jammeh and 69 of his alleged associates committed crimes against humanity and recommended that they face justice for their crimes. Correa is among the first of these individuals to face prosecution. His prosecution may allow victims to speak out about Correa’s alleged crimes and will raise awareness of the human rights violations that took place during the Jammeh regime.

In the U.S., Correa’s prosecution demonstrates the importance of universal jurisdiction, which recognizes that crimes like those allegedly committed by Correa are crimes against all people, regardless of their nationality. Universal jurisdiction proceedings like Correa’s are an important tool to ensure that alleged human rights violators from The Gambia are held accountable wherever they are found. His prosecution, and the prosecution of other alleged human rights violators, is a core part of the U.S.’s obligation to investigate and prosecute perpetrators of international crimes when they are identified on U.S. territory.

22. What role are CJA and TRIAL International playing in this case?

Victims’ groups as well as Gambian and international non-governmental organizations have been working together to hold Jammeh-era officials accountable through the “Jammeh2Justice” campaign. In September 2019, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security arrested Michael Correa for staying in the U.S. after his immigration visa expired. A coalition of Correa’s victims and human rights organizations, including CJA and TRIAL International called on the U.S. to investigate claims that Correa committed torture. This led to his indictment in 2020.

CJA and TRIAL International will continue to provide legal, psychological, and other support to victims – when needed – in preparation for, during, and after the trial. CJA and TRIAL International will also work with civil society, journalists, and impacted communities to make sure information about the trial is available through newspapers, radio, and other media.

23. What role is Gambian civil society playing in this case?

Gambian civil society has played an instrumental role in advocacy efforts related to Correa’s prosecution. Gambian organizations were a part of the coalition advocating for the U.S. to investigate claims that Correa committed torture.

Since Correa’s indictment, Gambian civil society organizations, including:

have been instrumental in raising awareness about the prosecution and in supporting victims in The Gambia.

In April 2024, alongside several other Gambian civil society organizations, these groups launched the Alliance of Victim-Led Organizations (AVLO), which is dedicated to representing the interests of victims of human rights violations in The Gambia. During Correa’s trial, AVLO will be actively involved in efforts to share information about the proceedings with victims and other interested parties in The Gambia.

24. Where can I read more about the case?

Selected court documents, including Correa’s June 2020 indictment, can be accessed online via the case docket. Additionally, CJA and TRIAL International have shared information regarding the case on their websites.

Commentary written by activists Fatou Baldeh, CEO of Women in Liberation & Leadership (WILL); Nana-Jo Ndow, founder and executive director of African Network against Extrajudicial Killings and Enforced Disappearances (ANEKED); Sirra Ndow, country director at ANEKED; Fatoumatta Sandeng, Founder & CEO – Solo Sandeng Foundation; and Marion Volkmann-Brandau, human rights lawyer. Published in the Gambian Newspaper The Republic on 28 May 2024.

Illustration article_Sonko case_The Republic

On the May 15, 2024 a court in Switzerland found Ousman Sonko, long term interior minister in The Gambia under the Jammeh regime, guilty of multiple counts of intentional homicide, torture and false imprisonment that were committed, as “part of a systematic attack on the civilian population” of the country. He is the highest ranking foreign official ever convicted by an European court.

While Sonko’s conviction marks another milestone in the pursuit of justice for victims of human rights violations in The Gambia and globally, it is also disappointing for organisations and individuals working closely with and for survivors of sexual and gender-based violence. Indeed, while Binta Jamba bravely testified that Ousman Sonko raped and tortured her for years, after having murdered her husband, the charges were dropped because the court considered it to be an “individual crime” outside its jurisdiction.

The decision disregards and distorts the cruel reality experienced by women and girls during the 22 years of the Jammeh regime: far from being a private matter, sexual violence by state officials was a criminal enterprise using state resources and means at their disposal. We are therefore alarmed that the court did not rule on the charge of rape despite it being as systematic as other crimes that Sonko has been found guilty of.

Since the historical neglect of sexualized and gender-based violence during Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, significant progress has been made in both the statutes and jurisprudence of international criminal tribunals concerning these crimes. Yet, time and time again, national courts applying the principle of universal jurisdiction as well as international ones, have decontextualised sexual violence from the broader pattern of violence. There is a tendency to view rape as ‘isolated,’ often because justice actors misinterpret it as a private or opportunistic crime (‘sex without consent’), when in fact it is a tool used by repressive regimes just as torture and killings.

Sexualised torture, rape and exploitation were common feature of the Jammeh regime and were perpetrated by many senior men, including the president himself. Several survivors and witnesses who spoke before the Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission (TRRC) provided detailed accounts of how state officials, while acting in their official capacity, sexually assaulted women on many occasions. For example, sexual violence in detention was common as early as 1995 and affected women as well as men. What these testimonies revealed is certainly just the top of a horrific iceberg.

Over the two years of its existence, the TRRC heard prominent enablers of the past regime and confronted them with many of the allegations made against them. However, they were never asked about their implication in sexual and gender-based violence. As a matter of fact, not once were witnesses from the security sector asked publicly about their knowledge of, or participation in, such crimes.

And neither the TRRC nor the Swiss Court seemed to have investigated what could have well been a pattern of sequestration and rape by Ousman Sonko. When Binta Jamba testified before the TRRC about her ordeal, she mentioned that on two occasions she was held captive in a house where she was raped and beaten by Sonko. The soldier who freed her from the room, told her that his “boss brought several other women here”. Who are these other women? And could Sonko really have had them guarded by a soldier if he was not in a position of power?

Sexual violence committed by officials is not a “private matter”. If transitional justice mechanisms, such as truth commissions and courts, fail to adequately investigate sexual and gender-based violence, nothing will change for the many survivors and perpetrators will continue to enjoy the impunity they cherish.

As The Gambia is in the process of setting up an Hybrid Court to prosecute the many crimes committed under the Jammeh regime, we call on the national and foreign jurisdictions to write history by fully and truthfully investigating and prosecuting sexual and gender-based violence at all levels. Only then will survivors feel that justice was served, for all.

Originally published in the Gambian newspaper The Republic.

The conviction of former Gambian Interior Minister Ousman Sonko in Switzerland for crimes against humanity on 15 May 2024 is historical in many ways. However, the decision by the Swiss Federal Criminal Court’s (FCC) to dismiss all charges of sexual violence casts a shadow over this landmark verdict. Ousman Sonko was found guilty of three murders, multiple acts of torture, illegal deprivations of liberty in conditions amounting to torture, all committed between 2000 and 2016 during the Yahya Jammeh dictatorship. However, the Swiss court failed to hold Ousman Sonko responsible for multiple rapes committed in the early 2000s and in 2006. While confirming that they had taken place, the court ruled that one of the two survivors of rapes could not be considered as part of the civilian population that was under attack and that they were individual acts committed outside the systematic attack against the population. It therefore had no jurisdiction to prosecute them.

TRIAL International believes that the FCC’s reasoning reflects a lack of understanding of the context of over two decades of repression in The Gambia, particularly with regard to sexual violence. The Yahya Jammeh’s regime was characterized by a widespread gender-based violence enabled by a well-conceived policy of protection, normalization and impunity of high-ranking officials, including Ousman Sonko. Although there is a culture of silence around such acts in The Gambia and therefore not many victims come forward for fear of stigma and retaliation, the victims in this case are emblematic examples, and by no means isolated incidents, of this sophisticated system in which sexual and gender-based violence was used as a weapon of repression. As emphasized in the final report of the Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission (TRRC)[1], the grave and repeated acts of sexual violence should not have been read outside the political context of the country at the time.

In the Gambia, The Alliance of Victim-Led Organisation (AVLO), The Women’s Association for Victims’ Empowerment (WAVE) and Women in Liberation and Leadership (WILL) – react in one voice: “Not convicting Ousman Sonko is a big blow to and a setback in the fight for justice for victims and survivors of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) and civil society actors working with them in The Gambia. In a context where it is a daily struggle to get victims to come forward, this will push them further into the darkness where impunity will thrive. Regrettably, this could also potentially have an impact on the accountability processes that we are preparing the ground for in the Gambia”.[2]

Indeed, the dismissal of these charges is not only a failure to deliver justice to the two plaintiffs; it is a failure to acknowledge the systemic use of sexual violence as a tool of oppression. The FCC’s decision reinforces the dangerous narrative that sexual violence is a private matter and that it does not enter within the justice-seeking scope of international criminal law. On 15 May 2024, the court missed a critical opportunity to overcome the patriarchal biases that are still present in international case law.

According to Annina Mullis and Caroline Renold, lawyers of the two plaintiffs affected by this decision, “it is yet another example of the general disregard for gender-based and sexualized violence. Instead of recognizing the structural aspects of the widespread sexual and gender-based violence in The Gambia during the rule of Yahya Jammeh, the FCC rejected all evidence requests submitted to demonstrate the systematic nature of SGBV in the country and yet at the same time deemed the charges brought by our clients against the defendant as outside the political. Our clients will of course appeal this decision.”

TRIAL International recalls that this issue remains persistent when it comes to the prosecution of international crimes and that sexual violence and survivors of such acts remain largely invisible in courts, perpetuating a culture of impunity. The organization works tirelessly to ensure justice for victims and survivors of sexual violence, including in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

The Organization remains steadfast in its commitment to fight for justice for all survivors of international crimes, including those of sexual violence and will continue to support the plaintiffs in their quest for justice.

[1] The 2021 TRRC final Report, Volume 10: “Sexual and Gender-based violence” is available for download here: https://www.moj.gm/downloads

[2] For more voices from The Gambia, read “Sonko case: How a Swiss court failed survivors of sexual violence in The Gambia, and worldwide“.

(Geneva, 15 May 2024) – Ousman Sonko, Gambian former Minister of Interior, was convicted today of crimes against humanity by the Swiss Federal Criminal Court (FCC). The FCC found him guilty of multiple crimes committed between 2000 and 2016, under the rule of Gambian ex-President Yahya Jammeh, and sentenced him to 20 years in prison. Mr. Sonko is the highest-ranking official ever convicted in Europe for international crimes under the principle of universal jurisdiction. His was also the second trial for crimes against humanity in Swiss judicial history.

In its verdict delivered today, the FCC found Ousman Sonko guilty of the killing of a perceived political opponent in 2000; of torture and illegal detention in connection with a coup plot in March 2006; of the killing of a politician in 2011 and of deprivations of liberty as well as acts of torture – including one killing – of peaceful demonstrators in 2016. The FCC further ordered Mr. Sonko to pay compensation to the plaintiffs, according to the harm suffered.

Ramzia Diab Ghanim, one of the ten plaintiffs in the case, comments today’s verdict: “This decision gives us the closure we had been waiting for long and shows that there is no hiding place for anyone who perpetrated international crimes in The Gambia, not even the highest-level individuals. However, I am disappointed that the Court failed to recognize that sexual violence is also an attack against us civilians.”

Despite this historic conviction, the Court abandoned all sexual offense charges related to 2000 onwards and 2006. Without judging that they did not take place, the Court considered that, in 2000 onwards, they were isolated from the context of attack directed against the civilian population and thus could not constitute crimes against humanity. The Court also found that electric chocs imposed on the genitals should be not considered as sexual violence but as torture. TRIAL International regrets this decision and will continue to support the plaintiffs, should they decide to appeal these aspects.

Indeed, the parties may contest the judgment by lodging an appeal with the Court of Appeals of the FCC.

Ousman Sonko was arrested in Switzerland in January 2017, a day after TRIAL International filed a criminal denunciation against him. Following an investigation that lasted over six years, the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland (OAG) indicted Mr. Sonko in April 2023. His trial took place in January and March 2024 before the FCC in Bellinzona.

The conviction was made possible thanks to Swiss law, which recognizes universal jurisdiction for certain serious crimes under international law, allowing for the prosecution of such crimes, regardless of where they were committed and of the nationality of either suspects or victims.

TRIAL International supported nine plaintiffs who traveled to Switzerland in January 2024 to be heard by the court. As the trial was held in German, the organization has advocated strongly, but largely in vain, for the proceedings to be translated and made accessible to victims and the Gambian population. TRIAL International also ensured the regular publication of summaries of the hearings throughout the proceedings.

Today’s conviction sets a historic precedent in the fight against impunity worldwide”, stated Philip Grant, Director of TRIAL International. “This verdict not only brings justice to the victims of these heinous crimes but also sends a strong signal to high-level perpetrators across the globe, including ministers: justice can catch up with you”, he added.

This conviction is another step on the long road to justice for all victims of the atrocities committed during Jammeh’s 1994-2016 reign of terror. It was the second trial based on the principle of universal jurisdiction for crimes committed in The Gambia. The first was the case of Bai L., a former member of a paramilitary unit known as the “Junglers”, created by the former president. He was sentenced by a German court to life imprisonment for crimes against humanity in November 2023. Another alleged member of the same death squad, Michael Correa, is scheduled to go on trial in the USA in September 2024. He is charged with torture and conspiracy to commit torture.

Recognizing Ousman Sonko’s role in the abuses committed during Jammeh’s dictatorship not only contributes to reducing impunity for the violations committed in The Gambia during Mr. Jammeh’s regime, but may also spur domestic prosecutions, propelling the transitional justice process initiated in 2017. In December 2021, the final report of The Gambia’s Truth Reconciliation and Reparations Commission’s concluded that Jammeh and 69 of his associates, including Ousman Sonko, had committed international crimes or grave human rights violations and called for their prosecution. The Gambian government published an implementation plan in May 2023. On 22-23 April 2024, the Gambian National Assembly thus passed a Special Prosecutor’s Office Bill and a Special Accountability Mechanism Bill. The Acts will have to be signed by the President before entering into force.

For more details, see the press release of the FCC.

(22-24 January 2024, Federal Criminal Court, Bellinzona, Switzerland)

Federal Criminal Court in Bellinzona
©TRIAL International / the Federal Criminal Court in Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Examination of the March 2006 charges in relation to the persecution of journalists

(acts of torture, false imprisonment and sexual violence committed as crimes against humanity)

As part of an attempted coup d’état in March 2006, Ousman Sonko is being accused, as an accomplice of a group of perpetrators, of having tortured various people, including members of the army, politicians and journalists, of having illegally deprived them of their freedom, as well as of having committed a rape in Banjul, The Gambia.

 

18 and 22 January 2024 – Days 9 & 11

The plaintiff called to testify has been a Gambian journalist since the 1990s. In the 2000s, he occupied a senior position at national renowned newspaper “The Independent”. In March 2006, The Independent published several articles to report on the attempted coup against Yahya Jammeh’s government.

The plaintiff recalled having been arrested at the end of March 2006. Without explanations on the reasons for his arrest, he was transferred to the National Intelligence Agency’s (NIA) headquarters, where he had to endure terrible acts of torture at the hands of the Junglers. On one occasion, he met Ousman Sonko and NIA staff there.

Upon his release on bail at the end of April 2006, he had to go to several hospitals, but the doctors refused him treatment out of fear, as it was clear that he had been tortured. He consequently fled to Senegal with his pregnant wife. He suffered severe physical and psychological trauma from what he went through. His whole family is traumatized, including his son.

At The Independent, everyone was persecuted, the question was not if someone was going to be arrested but when. According to the plaintiff, torture and tyranny started with the Jammeh regime.

 

23 January 2024 – Day 12

The plaintiff called to testify is a Gambian journalist since the 1990s. In 2006, he was occupying a senior position at the national renowned newspaper “The Independent” as well as within the Gambia Press Union (GPU). He was arrested at the end of March 2006, after the newspaper published several critical articles, discussing the coup attempt against Yahya Jammeh. In 2017 and 2022, he was elected as a parliamentarian for the UDP Party.

The police officers who arrested him at his workplace, first drove him to the Police Intervention Unit’s headquarters, where he saw many of his colleagues. He was then brought to the National Intelligence Agency, where he was detained for several weeks and interrogated about the articles he wrote. He suffered physical injuries and psychological trauma from the violence he went through.

At some point, he was taken before a panel, including Ousman Sonko, then Inspector General of Police (IGP). He was explained that he was targeted as journalist, especially one working for this newspaper.

At the time, the political situation was terrible. According to the plaintiff, The Gambia was hell between 1994 and 2016: Jammeh was a tyrant, justice was selective and unfair, the parliament was not free.

 

Procedural highlight

Upon hearing’s resumption on 23 January 2024, the defense filed a written affidavit from Ousman Sonko’s former wife dated 22 January 2024. According to the defense, this document highlights the accused’s personality especially in private.

The Prosecutor argued that the document was irrelevant for the defense but would not oppose to include it in the casefile if it was important to the accused.

The plaintiffs deferred to the court as to the admission of this document in the proceedings, however stressed that it had no significance in Swiss legal practice and that hearing her as witness was neither necessary nor recommended given her proximity to the accused and defense team and her attending of the trial.

The Court accepted the document into the casefile.

 

Interrogation of Ousman Sonko on the examination of the March 2006 charges

(acts of torture, false imprisonment and sexual violence committed as crimes against humanity)

 

23 January 2024 – Day 12

Ousman Sonko was called to testify and confronted with the outcome of the investigation as well as to the plaintiffs’ additional statements made before the Court, with regards to the above-mentioned charges.

The accused explained that the Gambian police was a respected force. He repeated that he only had non-operational duties as Inspector General of Police (IGP) and that the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) was never under his control. All investigative panels were set under the NIA and upon Yahya Jammeh’s orders. He contested the TRRC’s conclusions stating that he was responsible, as IP, for the torture of people allegedly involved in the coup attempt.

Amongst other statements, the accused affirmed that, on 21 March 2006, he was a member of the investigative panel for the first time, only as an observer, when the interrogations had already started. He visited it once or twice. His presence was required to release people, apologize for their arrest and detention. He had no knowledge of any acts of torture and it was not in his power to prevent them.

 

23-24 January 2024 – Days 12-13: Evidence requests, procedural decision and trial suspension until March 2024

The 23rd of January 2024 marked the termination of all the parties’ hearings. In accordance with the procedural code, the parties were then given the opportunity to request additional evidence.

The Prosecutor and the plaintiffs recalled that several persons could still be heard to prove the existence of a system of repression in The Gambia in the 2000s, and that the casefiles of two recent Gambian cases in other countries could be added as evidence.

The defense criticized TRIAL International’s support of the plaintiffs as well as the independence of the lawyers vis à vis the organisation.

 

On 24th of January 2024, the parties were invited to reply.

The defense’s arguments against TRIAL International were considered to be diversionary tactics, who withdrew its request.

The Court accepted some evidence material into the casefile.

However, the hearings of additional witnesses were rejected. It also refused to include documents from other cases and rejected all the requests of the defense.

The Court informed the parties that the phase of presentation of evidence is closed and that the closing arguments will take place during the reserve week of 4-8 March 2024. (date subject to change)

 

>> This summary of the third week of the proceedings of the Ousman Sonko’s trial, lists the most important points discussed during the hearings. TRIAL International does its best to summarize as accurately as possible what was said. The organization cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. <<

(15-19 January 2024, Federal Criminal Court, Bellinzona, Switzerland)

Plaintiffs, plaintiffs’ lawyers and TRIAL representatives before the FCC in Bellinzona during the second week of the trial of Ousman Sonko, former Minister of Interior of The Gambia.
©TRIAL International / plaintiffs, plaintiffs’ lawyers and TRIAL representatives before the FCC in Bellinzona during the second week of the trial.

15 January 2024 – Day 6

Examination of Ousman Sonko’s responsibility over Baba Joe’s murder in 2011

Ousman Sonko is accused of having intentionally killed Baba Jobe – a former member of the National Assembly – in Banjul in October 2011, in complicity with a group of perpetrators. He contested all the charges brought against him in relation to this event.

> Ousman Sonko contested all the charges brought against him in relation to this event.

A witness, who was heard during the investigative phase by the Swiss prosecuting authorities in 2021 in The Gambia, was called to testify upon the prosecution’s request. He was a prison guard (assistant to David Colley, General Director of prisons, at Mile 2 prison) and was responsible for guarding prisoner Baba Jobe, who was hospitalized in October 2011.

He confirmed that, upon orders from his superior, he granted a group of Junglers access to Baba Jobe’s hospital room, who subsequently killed him.

The witness also stated that inmates were picked up in Mile 2 prison, mostly by Junglers, and that when they were brought back it was clear that they had been tortured.

The witness recalled that David Colley, his superior, would provide day-to-day reports to Ousman Sonko every morning over the phone, which was denied by the accused. He did not admit either to having given any order about Baba Jobe’s murder to Colley.

15-17 January 2024 – Days 6 to 8

Examination of Ousman Sonko’s responsibility over the deprivation of liberty, torture and cruel detention conditions of protesters from April 2016 onwards

Ousman Sonko is being accused, in complicity with a group of perpetrators, of having tortured several political opponents and illegally depriving them of their liberty in the context of a political demonstration organized in April 2016 in Banjul. Within this context, Ousman Sonko is in particular suspected of having tortured and then killed one of the organizers of the demonstration.

> Ousman Sonko contested all the charges brought against him in relation to the torture, the deprivation of liberty and the cruel detention conditions of protestors in April 2016.

The plaintiffs and the Prosecutor requested witnesses to testify, who had both testified before the TRRC in 2020.

During the hearing, the first witness – requested by the plaintiffs –, who was a prison guard, confirmed that he had worked in the Mile 2 jail under Jammeh’s presidency, where he was himself imprisoned later. Mile 2 was not a clean place, where air did not circulate well. The little food detainees received was making them sick. In the security wing of Mile 2, political detainees were not detained at the same place as other inmates. The witness heard that the Junglers and the NIA had access to detainees. They allegedly came during the night so that no one would know what was going on. The witness confirmed having seen acts of torture being committed in Mile 2 when he was himself detained. He added that he had never seen Ousman Sonko in prison.

The second witness – requested by the Prosecutor –, was among the protesters arrested during the demonstration that took place on 14 April 2016. He declared having seen Ousman Sonko as well as other security officials at the NIA. There, the arrestees were strongly beaten and pressured into signing pre-written statements. He was then imprisoned. The witness then detailed the acts of torture and humiliations the arrestees went through. He personally also had to endure acts of a particular cruelty.

He was then brought before a panel which included Ousman Sonko, the MA Director and the NIA Director of Operations. Before this panel, visibly injured, he was again threatened. He was then transferred to other prisons, where he was ill-treated, without medical treatment and often without access to a lawyer or his family.

On the political and human rights’ context in The Gambia, the witness explained that, under Yahya Jammeh, opposition members or journalists would either be imprisoned or forced to leave the country. The judicial power was under the influence of the President and proceedings were partial.

Procedural highlight

The filing of additional material related to the illegal execution of nine Mile 2 inmates in 2012 (Gambian newspaper articles, videos, etc.) was discussed at the resumption of the hearing. In the Prosecutor and the plaintiffs’ views, this material supports the fact that a systematic and planned policy of oppression had been set up by the Gambian authorities. The material highlights the interaction amongst various state actors – and particularly the role of Ousman Sonko – within Yahya Jammeh’s government to implement the policy. The defense argued, that the filing of the material should be rejected as the inmates’ executions at stake were lawful, hence, cannot be the demonstration of a systematic or generalised attack against the civilian population.

> The Court subsequently ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and the prosecutor by accepting to add new evidence to the casefile.

17 and 18 January 2024 – Days 8 and 9

Examination of Ousman Sonko’s responsibility over the deprivation of liberty, torture and cruel detention conditions of protesters from April 2016 onwards as crimes against humanity

Ousman Sonko is being accused, in complicity with a group of perpetrators, of having tortured several political opponents and illegally depriving them of their liberty in the context of a political demonstration organized in April 2016 in Banjul. Within this context, Ousman Sonko is in particular suspected of having tortured and then killed one of the organizers of the demonstration.

First, two plaintiffs were called to provide their statements.

Both plaintiffs who were called to testify in relation to the April 2016 events are former members of the UDP (opposition party under Jammeh), who were strongly engaged in the activities of the party from an early age.

They were arrested and subsequently tortured in April 2016 and kept in detention for several months afterwards.

The first plaintiff to testify explained being arrested in April 2016 and brought to the Police Intervention Unit headquarters (PIU HQ) along with others. She was then taken to Mile 2 prison and to the National Intelligence Agency (NIA)’s premises. She described the torture and humiliation she went through as well as detailed the squalid detention conditions. Detained political opponents were treated like animals. She still suffers from severe physical damages.

The second plaintiff to testify explained that she was arrested on 14 April 2016 and taken to the PIU’s HQ, where she was hurt and humiliated. Along with other arrestees, she was brought to Mile 2 and then to the NIA premises. There, she was blindfolded and submitted to torture. During her time in Mile 2 she didn’t have access to a doctor or a lawyer and detention conditions were very poor.

A third plaintiff, who endured similar offenses in April 2016 onwards, had been fighting for justice in the proceedings against Ousman Sonko for several years. Indeed, in June 2017, she filed a complaint against him in Switzerland for the acts of torture she endured back then. Sadly, she passed away before having been able to tell her story before the Court.

Subsequently, Ousman Sonko was called to testify on the 14 April 2016 events.

He denied having been present at the Police Intervention Unit’s headquarters or taken part in the investigation panel at the NIA. He reiterated that the Junglers had not been under his supervision.

Notes that seem to be incriminating evidence were found in his suitcase by the police in 2017. He stated that the content was only partly true, even if he admitted it was his handwriting.

Further, he stated that in April 2016 protesters were not arrested because of their political opposition but because the demonstration had taken place illegally. So, the arrests were merely a security matter.

While he recognized the bad detention conditions at the time, Ousman Sonko repeated that he had done everything in his power to improve them during his term as Minister. He was not aware of any sexual assaults and apologized for any inconvenience their detention conditions might have caused the plaintiffs. He reiterated that he was never ordered to shoot at protesters and would not have followed such an order.

Day 10: Trial suspended until Monday 22 January 2024

After the hearing of Ousman Sonko on 18 January 2024, a plaintiff was called to provide a statement on his arrest and torture in 2006. His hearing was scheduled to continue on 19 January 2024.

The defense informed the Court and the parties that it would be unable to represent his client on the following day. Because the trial cannot continue without the presence of the defense, the Court suspended the proceedings and informed the parties they would resume on Monday 22 January 2024, 08:30 (CET). As a result, the remaining plaintiffs will have to be questioned next week, therefore the Court agreed that their stay be extended.

The other plaintiffs who were supposed to leave Switzerland on 20 January 2024 – as they already testified – would not have been able to hear the accused’s further questioning next week without finding additional means to extend their stay. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether the Court will eventually refund them, entirely or even at all.

With regards to victims’ access to justice, TRIAL International strongly believes that the plaintiffs’ attendance of Ousman Sonko’s hearing and confrontation with the facts at stake can contribute to their healing process as well as provide each and everyone of them with the closure they have been awaiting for years now.

TRIAL International reiterates that the plaintiffs should have been invited, and their costs covered, to attend the full length of the trial in the first place, as victims’ participation to these trials is of utmost importance and aligns with the principle of universal jurisdiction, which allows victims to be heard before foreign jurisdictions on the serious crimes they have suffered.

 

>> This summary of the second week of the proceedings of the Ousman Sonko’s trial, lists the most important points discussed during the hearings. TRIAL International does its best to summarize as accurately as possible what was said. The organization cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. <<

(8-12 January 2024, Federal Criminal Court, Bellinzona, Switzerland)

The trial of Ousman Sonko opened on 8 January 2024 before the Swiss Federal Criminal Court (FCC). A panel of three judges is examining the former Gambian Minister of Interior’s responsibility over the numerous crimes against humanity that he is accused of having committed between 2000 and 2016, under the regime of former President Yahya Jammeh.

During the three-weeks trial, Ousman Sonko will be represented by a defense team of four. Nine plaintiffs are heard over two weeks. They are represented by their lawyers and supported by TRIAL International, who filed the criminal denunciation against Ousman Sonko in 2017.

©TRIAL International / plaintiffs, plaintiffs’ lawyers and TRIAL representatives before the Swiss Federal Criminal Court in Bellinzona.
©TRIAL International / plaintiffs, plaintiffs’ lawyers and TRIAL representatives in front of the Swiss Federal Criminal Court in Bellinzona

8 January 2024 – The trial begins

On the first day, the hearing touched upon procedural and organizational questions. Within this framework, the defense argued that Switzerland had no jurisdiction over the crimes that Ousman Sonko is accused of having committed between 2000 and 2006 and that these alleged crimes were time-barred. The defense team also requested for numerous evidence material to be removed from the casefile on procedural grounds.

As a response, the Federal Prosecutor and the plaintiffs’ lawyers recalled that the Swiss case law is in favor of the prosecution.

In Switzerland, “(…) a perpetrator can be prosecuted and punished for crimes against humanity committed before 2011 until the end of his or her life, regardless of the passage of time.” (Federal Prosecutor’s pleading of 8 January 2024)

In addition, the plaintiffs’ lawyers requested that the charges be examined as aggravated, considering the high number of persons affected and the particularly cruel nature of the facts to be judged.

Both parties requested for all of the proceedings to be translated in English.

 

9 January 2024 – Going forward with the case

The proceedings resumed with the Court ruling that the trial would first examine the substance and, once it has established whether crimes against humanity were committed or not, it will consider the parties’ arguments regarding its jurisdiction and the statute of limitations.

The Court then ruled that the challenged evidence material had been collected in compliance with the law by prosecuting authorities and that, as a result, the casefile would remain as it is.

Regarding the translation of the proceedings, the Court explained that the English interpretation would not be provided for the parts of the trial that it considers non-essential for the parties.

After those issues were clarified, the Court proceeded with the substance of the case.

As prescribed by law, the Court reminded Ousman Sonko of the accusations pending against him. He was then asked to answer questions on his personal situation. He stated that the seven years of pre-trial detention had been the worst time of his life, mentioning that his health deteriorated and that the financial situation of his family had worsened.

In an open statement, Ousman Sonko reaffirmed that he was not guilty of the crimes he is accused of. He assured that he has always been loyal to his country and served it as best as he could, trying to improve prison conditions and professionalize the work of security forces and police. He claimed to have no knowledge of any ill-treatment in the security wings of Gambian prisons.

Ousman Sonko then criticized Swiss authorities:

“Switzerland is not in a position to lecture anyone on human rights.” (Ousman Sonko – Open statement of 8 January 2024)

 

10 January 2024 – Examination of the 2000s charges

(murder of Almamo Manneh and multiple rapes as crimes against humanity)

“Ousman Sonko is being accused of having participated in the murder of Almamo Manneh, former member of the State Guards, in January 2000 and, of having sexually assaulted his widow between the years 2000 to 2002 as well as having tortured, raped and sequestrated her in 2005.” (Indictment filed against Ousman Sonko on 17 April 2023)

On the third day of the trial, Almamo Manneh’s widow was heard by the Court. Sonko was placed in a separate room, to avoid a direct confrontation with him during her interrogation. She explained how Sonko severely and repeatedly abused her. She noted that from the mid-1990s, it was hell for Gambians who opposed the Government. Following her testimony at the TRRC, she had been contacted by many women who had also been sexually assaulted but who were scared to report the assaults.

When questioned about Almamo Manneh’s murder, Sonko explained that he was bound by professional secrecy and could not comment further. Regarding the rape and torture allegations, he affirmed that he was not in the country at the time of the events, as he was travelling for a UN engagement and only came back once to The Gambia for a break. The Court informed the parties that it was waiting for the UN to confirm this information.

 

10-12 January 2024 – Examination of the March 2006 charges – continued

(acts of torture, false imprisonment and sexual violence committed as crimes against humanity)

“As part of an attempted coup d’état in March 2006, Ousman Sonko is being accused, as an accomplice of a group of perpetrators, of having tortured various people, including members of the army, politicians and journalists, of having illegally deprived them of their freedom, as well as of having committed a rape in Banjul, The Gambia.” (Indictment filed against Ousman Sonko on 17 April 2023)

During three days, three plaintiffs provided an account of the acts of torture they had been submitted to within the frame of an investigation conducted on an alleged coup attempt in March 2006.

Ousman Sonko contested all the charges brought against him in relation to these events. He will be heard at a later stage regarding these events.

The first plaintiff to address the Court recalled his arrest on 21 March 2006, when he was violently interrogated and submitted to acts of torture at the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) on several occasions. As a result, he still suffers from serious physical and mental after-effects. The plaintiff also recalled that the members of an investigation panel set up at the premises of the NIA – including Ousman Sonko – knew very well that people were being tortured within the frame of this investigation.

At the time, the country was under extreme dictatorship. People were arrested and imprisoned without being brought before court. Others disappeared. People were living in constant fear.” (Plaintiff’s statement regarding the Gambian context, 10 January 2024)

The second plaintiff to give a statement explained that she was arrested on 24 March 2006 and detained, then brought to the premises of the NIA. She found herself in a room where many people – amongst whom Ousman Sonko and the former vice-director of the NIA – were sitting. She was interrogated on the attempted coup that was suspected to have taken place. During her presence at the NIA, she was raped, humiliated and tortured. Following these horrific events, she was put in jail, where she remained for several weeks – along with other people.

In October of the same year, she was arrested again at her home and imprisoned. Eventually, she was released.

The plaintiff mentioned the physical and mental impacts these acts had on her since then.

The Gambian judicial system was accomplice to the government, within which judges were answering to the orders of the President.” (Plaintiff’s statement regarding the Gambian context, 11 January 2024)

The third plaintiff confirmed he had been kidnapped form the Parliament in March 2006. Taken to the NIA premises on several occasions, he had been questioned on his suspected role in the alleged coup attempt. He was submitted to acts of torture on several occasions and pressured to sign a statement. He suffered important physical and psychological consequences from the acts of torture he had endured and remains affected in his daily life ever since.

“I have been subjected to heinous crimes and humiliation that I never thought a man could do to another one!” (Plaintiff’ statement regarding the Gambian context, 11 January 2024)

 

>> This summary of the first week of the proceedings of the Ousman Sonko’s trial, lists the most important points discussed during the hearings. TRIAL International does its best to summarize as accurately as possible what was said. The organization cannot be held responsible for any errors or omissions. <<

Gambian Ex-Minister Sonko Faces Crimes Against Humanity Charges

(Geneva, January 5, 2024) – The opening of a Swiss trial on January 8, 2024, for serious crimes committed in The Gambia represents a significant advance for justice for the victims of grave abuses, Gambian and international groups that are part of the Jammeh2Justice campaign said today.

Bai Lowe trial_Germany_Celle_2022
Victims and representatives from non-governmental organizations stand in front of the Higher Regional Court in Celle, Germany. © 2022 Whitney-Martina Nosakhare/HRW

The former Gambian Interior Minister Ousman Sonko is charged with crimes against humanity relating to torture, kidnapping, sexual violence, and unlawful killings between 2000 and 2016 under then-President Yahya Jammeh. Jammeh’s 22-year rule was marked by systematic and widespread human rights violations, such as arbitrary arrests, torture including sexual violence, extrajudicial killings, and enforced disappearances of actual and perceived opponents to his rule.

The trial of Ousman Sonko is another major step in the search for justice for victims of brutal crimes and their families committed under Jammeh’s rule,” said Sirra Ndow, coordinator of the Jammeh2Justice campaign. “The Sonko case should reinforce efforts back in The Gambia to try crimes under Jammeh’s rule so that perpetrators are held to account for the atrocities committed.”

Sonko was arrested in Bern, Switzerland on January 26, 2017, the day after TRIAL International filed a criminal complaint against him. The Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland filed an indictment against Sonko before the Federal Criminal Court on April 17, 2023. The trial, taking place in the city of Bellinzona, is expected to last about three weeks.

The trial is possible because Swiss law recognizes universal jurisdiction over certain serious international crimes, allowing for the prosecution of these crimes no matter where they were committed and regardless of the nationality of the suspects or victims. Swiss nongovernmental organizations, former federal prosecutors, members of parliament, and others have previously criticized judicial officials in Switzerland for lagging behind other European countries on universal jurisdiction cases despite having solid legislation to address serious crimes.

With Sonko’s trial, Switzerland appears at last to be gaining momentum on prosecuting atrocity crimes committed abroad,” said Philip Grant, executive director at TRIAL International, which supports plaintiffs in the case. “Sonko is the highest-level former official to be tried under the principle of universal jurisdiction in Europe.”

Sonko is the second person to be tried in Switzerland before a non-military court for serious crimes committed abroad, the second person to be tried in Europe for crimes committed in The Gambia, and the highest ranked official to be prosecuted in Europe on the basis of universal jurisdiction. Gambian activists and survivors, and international advocates will attend the trial’s opening in Bellinzona and are available for comment. The first case addressing crimes committed in The Gambia was in Germany against Bai Lowe, a former member of the paramilitary unit known as the “Junglers,” which Jammeh created. Lowe was convicted and sentenced to life in prison by a German court on November 30, 2023, for two murders and an attempted murder, constituting crimes against humanity.

A major challenge will be to ensure that Gambians, whether in the audience or outside the courtroom, can access, follow, and understand the proceedings, which will be conducted in German. Survivors, victims’ groups, and civil society groups have tried to ensure that information on developments is disseminated within The Gambia to increase their impact.

Developments in the proceedings of such a significant case should be made accessible to Gambians, victims and non-victims alike, in the English language, which they understand, thereby boosting their interest in the trial,” said Fatoumata Sandeng, a plaintiff in the Sonko case who heads the Solo Sandeng Foundation. “Greater action on accountability by the government back home in Gambia is also needed.”

Since Jammeh’s fall, The Gambia has moved forward with only two prosecutions for Jammeh-era crimes. In December 24, 2021, the final report of Gambia’s Truth Reconciliation and Reparations Commission(TRRC) found that Jammeh and 69 of his associates committed crimes against humanity, and called for their prosecution. On May 25, 2022, the Gambian government accepted the TRRC’s recommendation for accountability, but without an action plan.

On May 12, 2023, the government presented a long-awaited detailed implementation plan calling for the creation of a Special Prosecutor’s Office to complete the investigations initiated by the TRRC and to prepare case-ready dossiers. A hybrid tribunal of Gambia and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) would be created to carry out prosecutions of the most serious offenses. The Gambia and ECOWAS have created a joint technical committee to develop the hybrid court.

The Gambian government and ECOWAS should move without delay to create the hybrid court,” said Elise Keppler, associate international justice director at Human Rights Watch. “Victims and the Gambian public have waited a very long time to have the chance to see justice done.”

Groups involved with the campaign include: Africa Center for International Law and Accountability (ACILA), African Network Against Extrajudicial Killings and Enforced Disappearances (ANEKED), Amnesty International–Ghana, Center for Justice and Accountability (CJA), Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI), Gambia Center for Victims of Human Rights Violations, Ghana Center for Democratic Development (CDD-GHANA), Human Rights Advocacy Center, Human Rights Watch, International Commission of Jurists, Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa (IHRDA), Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA), POS Foundation, Right 2 Know–Gambia, Solo Sandeng Foundation, The Toufah Foundation, TRIAL International, and Women’s Association for Victims’ Empowerment (WAVE).

For more information on the trial, please visit:
https://trialinternational.org/latest-post/ousman-sonko-case-the-second-trial-for-crimes-against-humanity-in-switzerland-to-take-place-in-january-2024/ or read our Frequently Asked Questions about the case.

For more Human Rights Watch reporting on The Gambia, please visit:
https://www.hrw.org/africa/gambia

For more information, please contact:

  • For Human Rights Watch, in New York, Elise Keppler (English, French): +1-917-687-8576 (mobile); or kepplee@hrw.org. Twitter: @EliseKeppler
  • For TRIAL International, in Geneva, Vony Rambolamanana (English, French, German): +33-66 -48-80-305 (mobile); or media@trialinternational.org. Twitter: @trial
  • For ANEKED, in New York, Nana-Jo Ndow (English, French, Spanish, Portuguese): +1-929-684-5734 (mobile); or nanajo.ndow@aneked.org. @theANEKED
  • For International Commission of Jurists, in Barcelona, Reed Brody (English, Spanish, French, Portuguese): +1-917-388-6745 (mobile); or reedbrody@gmail.com. Twitter: @reedbrody
  • For Solo Sandeng Foundation, in Germany, Fatoumatta Sandeng (English, German, Mandinka, Wollof) +49-16-31-74-75-19 (mobile); or solosandengfoundation@gmail.com. Twitter: @solosandengfound

(Geneva, 4 January 2024) – The trial of Ousman Sonko, former Gambian Minister of Interior, will open before the Swiss Federal Criminal Court on 8 January 2024 and last until 30 January. Ousman Sonko is accused of multiple counts of crimes against humanity, allegedly committed under the regime of former Gambian President Yahya Jammeh. TRIAL International filed the criminal complaint against Ousman Sonko in January 2017.

Banner_CP ouverture procès Ousman Sonko Gambia

Frontpage of Gambian national media reporting about Ousman Sonko’s trial in Switzerland.

The Swiss prosecuting authorities have charged Mr. Sonko with a range of heinous acts: the killing of a political opponent in 2000; acts of sexual violence between 2000 and 2002, as well as in 2005; involvement in torture and illegal detention related to a coup plot in March 2006; and the murder of a politician in 2011. The Office of the Attorney General also accuses Ousman Sonko of having co-perpetrated deprivation of liberty and acts of torture of peaceful demonstrators in 2016, when he was Minister of the Interior. These acts have been qualified by the Swiss prosecutor as crimes against humanity.

This trial is a significant moment in Swiss judicial history, being only the second trial for crimes against humanity in the country. Ousman Sonko will also be the highest-ranking state official ever to be tried for international crimes under the principle of universal jurisdiction in Europe”, said Leslie Haskell, President of TRIAL International. Under this principle, States have the possibility to prosecute the perpetrators of international crimes on their territory, regardless of where the crimes were committed or the nationality of the perpetrators and victims.

TRIAL International is supporting nine plaintiffs who will travel all the way to Bellinzona to be heard by the court. Unfortunately, a tenth passed away in October 2023, due to lasting consequences of her mistreatment at the time. This trial shines a beacon of hope for victims of the atrocities committed during Jammeh’s 1994-2016 reign of terror. On 30 November 2023 already, a former member of a paramilitary unit known as “Junglers”, created by the former President, was sentenced by a German court to life imprisonment for crimes against humanity, in relation to two murders and an attempted murder. Another alleged member of the same death squad, Michael Correa, is scheduled to stand trial in Denver, USA, in September 2024. He faces charges of torture and conspiracy to commit torture.

While the transitional justice process in The Gambia remains too slow, these trials in Germany and Switzerland are finally providing the closure that the victims have been waiting for too long now”, said one of the plaintiffs, whose identity remains hidden at this stage. Indeed, a possible recognition of Ousman Sonko’s role in the abuses committed during Jammeh’s dictatorship will not only contribute to reducing impunity for the violations that took place in The Gambia during Mr. Jammeh’s regime, but may also spur domestic prosecutions, propelling the transitional justice process initiated in 2017.

The proceedings will be in German and open to the public and the media. However, there will be no interpretation provided other than when the defendant, the victims and English-speaking witnesses will take the stand. TRIAL International expresses regret over this decision, which will limit the ability of plaintiffs, journalists and the Gambian community to fully comprehend and report on the proceedings. Upholding the principle that “justice must not only be done but be seen to be done,” TRIAL International advocates for meaningful access to such a historic trial for victims and the affected Gambian communities.

The trial of Ousman Sonko, former Gambian Minister of Interior, will open on 8 January 2024 before the Swiss Federal Criminal Court (FCC).

Ousman Sonko is accused of multiple counts of crimes against humanity, allegedly committed between 2000 and 2016, during the rule of former Gambian dictator Yahya Jammeh.

This will be the second trial for crimes against humanity in Swiss judicial history. Moreover, Ousman Sonko will be the highest-ranking state official ever to be tried for international crimes in application of the principle of universal jurisdiction in Europe.

The trial of Ousman Sonko will open on Monday 8 January 2024 before the FCC, situated in Bellinzona, Ticino, Switzerland. It is planned to last until 30 January, with a week reserve time between 4-8 March 2024.

The proceedings will be in German and open to the public and journalists within the limits of the available courtroom space.

Interest journalists can request accreditation with the General Secretariat of the FCC.

Further information provided by the FCC.

Contact: media@trialinternational.org, +41 22 519 03 96

TRIAL International will be present in Bellinzona during the trial.

For more details on the case, you can read our article of 3 November 2023, our press release of 18 April 2023 and our Q&A. (available in English, French and German)

  1. Who is Bai L. and what are the charges against him?

Bai L. is a 48-year-old Gambian citizen who is alleged to have been a member of the “Junglers” death squad, a paramilitary unit also known as the “Patrol Team” created by the former Gambian President Yahya Jammeh. According to the indictment, “the aim of [the Junglers’] operations was to intimidate the Gambian people and suppress the opposition.” Bai L. is charged with five counts of crimes against humanity. German prosecutors accuse Bai L. of being involved in the attempted murder of Ousman Sillah, a lawyer, in 2003, as well as in the murder of Deyda Hydara, a journalist, in 2004, the attempted murder of Ida Jagne and Nian Sarang Jobe, who were with Hydara, and the murder  former Gambian soldier Dawda Nyassi, in 2006.

Bai L. has been in pretrial detention since his arrest in March 2021 in Germany, where he had been living since leaving The Gambia 2012. This trial, which began on April 25, 2022 in the German city of Celle, is the first to tackle human rights violations committed in The Gambia during the Jammeh era on the basis of universal jurisdiction.

  1. Why is Bai L. being tried in Germany?

Bai L.’s trial in Germany is possible because the country’s laws recognize universal jurisdiction over certain serious crimes under international law, allowing for the investigation and prosecution of these crimes no matter where they were committed, and regardless of the nationality of the suspects or victims. Because Bai L. is living in Germany, German authorities are under an obligation to prosecute the case.

Universal jurisdiction cases are increasingly important in international efforts to hold those responsible for atrocities accountable, to provide justice to victims who have nowhere else to turn, to help deter future crimes and to ensure that countries do not become safe havens for human rights abusers. A number of European countries have ongoing investigations and prosecutions related to grave abuses committed abroad in places such as the Democratic Republic of CongoIraqLiberiaSyria, and Ukraine.

German authorities have been leaders in conducting prosecutions based on universal jurisdiction. In January 2022, a German court in Koblenz convicted a former Syrian intelligence officer for crimes against humanity and sentenced him to life in prison. In the 2023 edition of TRIAL International’s Universal Jurisdiction Annual Review, eight universal jurisdiction cases have been listed in Germany for the year 2022, seven of them relating to Syria, and the Bai L. case relating to The Gambia.

  1. What was the human rights situation in The Gambia under Yahya Jammeh?

Yahya Jammeh’s 1994-2017 rule was marked by systematic oppression of real or perceived opponents. The government targeted, among others: journalists, human rights defenders, student leaders, religious leaders, political opposition members, judiciary officials, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) people. This resulted in serious human rights violations, including torture, extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearance, and sexual violence.

Many of these human rights violations were brought to light during the hearings of The Gambia’s landmark Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission (TRRC), which was set up in 2018. A total of 393 witnesses, including victims and former government insiders, testified during over two years of public hearings.

Witnesses at the TRRC, including direct perpetrators, linked Jammeh to the killing and torture of political opponents, the murder of 59 West African migrants, and “witch hunts” in which hundreds of people were arbitrarily detained, among other crimes. They also alleged that Jammeh raped and sexually assaulted women and ran a sham HIV-treatment program.

  1. Who were the victims of Bai L.’s alleged crimes?

Ousman Sillah was one of the lawyers of Baba Jobe, former leader of the parliament majority who had been close to Jammeh but was later jailed for alleged tax evasion. Jobe died in 2011 under controversial circumstances while in prison. Sillah survived a December 2003 attack on his life, purportedly carried out as retaliation for his aggressive defense of Jobe. Bai L. allegedly was driving the vehicle used by the Junglers during this operation.

Deyda Hydara was a renowned Gambian journalist, co-founder, and primary editor of The Point Newspaper, as well as an Agence France Presse (AFP) and Reporters Without Borders’ (RSF)  correspondent in the country. He had a widely read column in The Point, “Good morning, Mr President,” on Gambian politics. According to RSF, Hydara was being spied on by Gambian intelligence services just before his death. Hydara was killed on December 16, 2004. Bai L. is accused of driving the killers to and from the scene and having used his car to cut off Hydara’s car.

Dawda Nyassi was a Gambian citizen who had gone to fight in Liberia’s civil war. When he returned to The Gambia, he was allegedly shot by members of the Junglers in 2006 because he was suspected of having plans to overthrow Jammeh. Here again, Bai L. allegedly drove the killers to the crime scene during this Junglers-led operation.

The TRRC found that Jammeh ordered the Junglers to murder Sillah, Hydara and Nyassi. Gambia’s TRRC also called for Bai L.’s prosecution in the murder of the 59 West African migrants in 2005. He is not charged for this crime in Germany, however, NGOs have called for German authorities to investigate this massacre as well. Martin Kyere, a key witness to this crime, testified in Celle (see below).

  1. What evidence has been presented at the trial?

The prosecution submitted two long and publicly accessible interviews which Bai L. gave to Pa Nderry M’Bai, editor of Freedom Radio, a Gambian opposition station based in the United States  in 2013, and to leading Gambian journalist and host of the Fatu Network, Fatou Camara in 2014. In those interviews given after Bai L. had left The Gambia and was living in Germany, he described in great detail the Hydara and Nyassi killings, as well as the Sillah shooting. He also talked in those conversations about his role as a driver in those acts as well as in the murder of the West African migrants, the execution of former intelligence chief Daba Marenah and four associates in April 2006, and the murder of Jammeh’s cousin Haruna Jammeh. According to Bai L., Jammeh was allegedly behind each of the Junglers’ operations. Considerable evidence was presented at the trial, including from the defense, related to the circumstances, the authenticity, and the truthfulness of those interviews, as well as to Bai L.’s motives for conducting the interviews. This evidence included thousands of chats and photos taken from Bai L.’s telephone and of conversations he had with others about the interviews and about his time in The Gambia.

Other witnesses included German investigators, a German expert on The Gambia’s history, a former Gambian Jungler who had given a prior statement that Bai L. was a Jungler (though at trial he chose to remain silent), Bai L.’s former trainer in the army who testified that Bai L. was a Jungler, the German asylum judge who interviewed Bai L. during which he described his role in the Hydara killing, acquaintances of Bai L. who placed him as a member of the Junglers, Ida Jagne and Nian Sarang Jobe who were both passengers in the car Deyda Hydara was driving when he was killed, and Pap Saine, co-founder with Deyda Hydara of The Point newspaper. Deyda Hydara’s son, Baba Hydara, who is also a journalist, as well as his younger brother Deyda Hydara Jr., Fatou Sillah, daughter of Ousman Sillah, and Omar Nyassi, son of Dawda Nyassi, testified as well. Additionally, a former driver at the State House provided an alleged alibi, explaining that on the night of Deyda Hydara’s assassination, he was transporting equipment with the accused to Kanilai. Much of the evidence centered on the Hydara case over the other two.

Transcripts and recordings of the TRRC proceedings which mentioned Bai L.’s alleged participation in the crimes were also entered into evidence. On the issue of whether Bai L. was a Jungler, Martin Kyere of Ghana, the sole known survivor of the massacre of the West African migrants, testified that he recognized Bai L. in a photo line-up organized by the German police as well as in court from interactions they had when Kyere was detained in 2005. In one instance, Kyere said, Bai L. pushed him during the migrants’ initial arrest and a second time he took Kyere to the pick-up truck he was driving, in which they were taken into the forest where all of Kyere’s companions were killed. Kyere admitted that he had seen photos of Bai L. on the internet and the defense argued that after 18 years, his identification of Bai L. could not be relied upon.

  1. What has Bai L. said about the charges?

In October 2022, when Bai L. expressed himself for the first time since the beginning of his trial, he offered a statement read out by his lawyers in which he said that he left The Gambia in 2012 after soldiers came twice to his house to arrest him, and claimed that the information he shared on the murders during the 2013 and 2014 interviews were based on elements narrated to him beginning in 2006 by Junglers he knew, and that, although he had not been part of the Junglers, he was encouraged by journalist Pa Nderry M’Bai to pose as a former Jungler to “make the people in The Gambia believe the truth” about Jammeh’s crimes. Pa Nderry M’Bai who died in 2021 could not be heard in court in this regard. Bai L. said that by posing as a Jungler, he thought he would add credibility to the accounts given to him by others. “It did, finally, lead to the people in The Gambia knowing the truth about Jammeh,” he said in his statement, while denying his participation in the murders and attempted murder tried in court: “I did not participate in any of these acts.”

A former Gambian officer said that, in his own interview with journalist Pa Nderry M’Bai, he was also instructed by the journalist to pose as Jungler and as a direct eyewitness to the events described, in order to make them more credible to the Gambian public. Others contested the veracity of this officer’s account. Journalist Fatu Camara, who interviewed Bai L. in 2014, also testified that she could not imagine Pa Nderry M’Bai giving instructions of this nature to his interviewees; and that in her own interview, there were no signs pointing to the possibility that what the accused was sharing about their implication in these murders was untrue.

  1. How have survivors and victims been involved in the proceedings?

Deyda Hydara’s son, Baba Hydara is a joint plaintiff in the trial against Bai L., alongside Dawda Nyassi’s sons Omar and Modou Nyassi, as well as Ida Jagne, Deyda Hydara’s former colleague who was present in the car Hydara was driving when he was shot, and incurred injuries during the attack.

Under German law, a victim of certain crimes charged in the trial or a family member of a victim who was killed can join a criminal proceeding as a joint plaintiff, thereby becoming a formal party to the proceeding.

The joint plaintiffs and their lawyers were present at the trial and were able to enjoy the same procedural rights as the prosecution and the defense such as questioning witnesses and experts, filing and reacting to procedural motions, and requesting evidence to be introduced into the trial. Baba Hydara and Omar Nyassi also gave closing statements.

  1. What sentence does Bai L. face if he is convicted?

If convicted by the Higher Regional Court of Celle, Bai L. could face up to life in prison. Judgments by Higher Regional Courts in Germany can be appealed at the German Federal Court of Justice.

  1. Will Yahya Jammeh or other high-level officials be prosecuted for serious crimes committed in The Gambia?

Jammeh is currently in Equatorial Guinea, where he sought exile in January 2017 after losing the December 2016 presidential election to Adama Barrow. Since his fall, The Gambia has moved forward with only two prosecutions for Jammeh-era crimes. On July 14, 2021, Yankuba Touray, former minister of local government in the early days of Jammeh’s military junta, was found guilty of the 1995 murder of former finance minister Ousman Koro Ceesay. On July 13, 2022, after a five-year trial, a Gambian court convicted Yankuba Badjie, the former Director-General of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA), and five others for the 2015 murder of opposition leader Solo Sandeng who died in custody after leading a peaceful march for political reform.

On December 24, 2021, the final report of Gambia’s TRRC was published, concluding that Jammeh and 69 of his associates committed crimes against humanity and calling for itheir prosecution. On May 25, 2022, the Gambian government responded with a White Paper accepting the TRRC’s recommendation that those responsible be prosecuted, though without presenting a plan for how to do so, despite the fact that such a TRRC recommendation had been predictable for many years.

Indeed, since 2019, the Gambia Bar Association had independently led a series of multi-stakeholder consultations on how any trials recommended by the TRRC should be conducted. These discussions resulted in a consensus in favor of a “hybrid” court, anchored on a treaty with Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), with both Gambian and international staff, with a framework tailored to the prosecution of the worst Jammeh-era crimes that would ultimately build the capacity of the national justice system.

The hybrid court proposal was also backed by the United Nations Working Group on Enforced Disappearances. Finally, at an international stakeholders conference on May 12, 2023, the government presented a long-awaited detailed implementation plan for the TRRC recommendations, calling for the creation of a Special Prosecutors’ Office to complete the investigations initiated by the TRRC and to prepare case-ready dossiers, followed by a Gambia-ECOWAS hybrid tribunal to carry out prosecutions of the most serious offenses.

The Gambia and ECOWAS have created a joint technical committee to develop the modalities for the hybrid court. Given how long victims and Gambian society have now waited for accountability, and how long it took the government to propose a concrete implementation plan, the government and ECOWAS should move quickly to establish the hybrid court so that it can commence work.

  1. Could Bai L. be tried in The Gambia as well?

When The Gambia begins to prosecute those designated by the TRRC, it could request Bai L.’s extradition from Germany to stand trial. The principle of double jeopardy (ne bis in idem) enshrined in international law and the Gambian constitution would prevent The Gambia from prosecuting him for any of the acts included in the indictment in the current trial, however.

  1. Is anyone else being prosecuted under universal jurisdiction for crimes committed in The Gambia during the Jammeh era?

Bai L. is not the first person to have been indicted outside of The Gambia for crimes committed in Gambia under Jammeh. Another alleged Jungler, Michael Correa, 44, was indicted in the United States in June 2020 on charges of torturing individuals suspected of having plotted a coup in The Gambia in 2006. He is currently awaiting trial, which is scheduled to start on September 16, 2024 before the US District Court of Colorado in Denver.

On April 17, 2023, Swiss prosecutors indicted Ousman Sonko, former Interior Minister of The Gambia, on charges of crimes against humanity, six years after his first arrest in Bern. Sonko is the highest-ranking individual to be prosecuted in Europe under the principle of universal jurisdiction. He is accused of the killing of a perceived political opponent, acts of sexual violence, the murder of a politician, as well as of having been involved in deprivation of liberty and acts of torture– including against Solo Sandeng, which led to his death. His trial before the Swiss Federal Criminal Court in the city of Bellinzona will open on January 8, 2024.

  1. How accessible has the trial been to the public and journalists and affected communities in Gambia?

Distance, language, and the lack of an outreach program have made it difficult for Gambians to follow the trial. The trial is taking place on a different continent, in a foreign language, without audio or video coverage to those not in the courtroom, with no transcripts and little press coverage.

Due to Covid-19 restrictions, there has been a limited number of seats available for the public in the courtroom. According to the March 30, 2022 news release of the Higher Regional Court of Celle, 15 seats were available for accredited journalists, and one was reserved for Gambian journalists. The court has been welcoming towards the press, including Gambian journalists, two of whom attended the opening and another two who travelled to Celle in June 2022 to document the trial. The trial has not received sustained attention in the international press, with some exceptions such as three articles on the website JusticeInfo.net.

The trial has been conducted in German with an interpreter for the defendant who alternated between Wolof and English. Unlike the above-mentioned Koblenz trial, where the interpreter’s feed was only available to accredited journalists, at Celle, the interpreter’s feed has been available upon request to all those present in the courtroom.

The verdict will first only be available in German, and no official transcript of trial proceedings in any language will be provided once the trial concludes. The Higher Regional Court in Celle published one news release about the opening of the trial in English. Legislation is pending in Germany that would foresee the translation of important judgments in international crimes cases to English. Generally, it takes several months until a written judgment is rendered, following the oral one. A translation to English by the German Ministry of Justice would take additional time.

To be meaningful, justice should not only be done, but be seen to be done. Research by Human Rights Watch, the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) and others has shown that the impact of accountability efforts on affected communities strongly correlates to outreach efforts. As Germany is acting on behalf of the international community through this trial, information should be more accessible to those most affected by the crimes. The court should consider ways to address this, for instance by making the verdict accessible in the relevant national languages and by facilitating the work of media representatives that are part of and report for the affected communities.

To ensure some record of the trial, TRIAL International and the International Commission of Jurists organized a trial monitoring program with a team from Georg-August-University of Göttingen for the entire duration of the trial. The students attended each hearing and took detailed notes in English. These notes were shared with Gambian civil society groups such as African Network against Extra-judicial Killings and Enforced Disappearances (ANEKED) and the Solo Sandeng Foundation, which could then use them to inform their constituents about the proceedings. The Point newspaper in Gambia and Journalists for Justice published articles based on the students’ reporting as well.

This question-and-answer document has been prepared by ANEKED, ECCHR, the Gambian Center for Victims of Human Rights Violations, Human Rights Watch, the International Commission of Jurists, Reporters Without Borders, the Rose Lokissim Association, the Solo Sandeng Foundation and TRIAL International.

The trial of Ousman Sonko – the former Gambian Interior Minister accused of having committed multiple crimes against humanity – will open on 8 January 2024 before the Federal Criminal Court in Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Tribunale Penale Federale_Bellinzona_Wikimedia
The building of the Federal Criminal Court in Bellinzona, Switzerland. © Wikimedia Commons

This will be the second trial for crimes against humanity in the Swiss judicial history. Moreover, Ousman Sonko will be the highest-ranking state official ever to be tried for international crimes in application of the principle of universal jurisdiction in Europe.

With the dates of the opening of the trial, the victims’ hope of finally seeing their abuser brought to justice becomes a reality. “Some of the victims have fought this battle for more than twenty years, and Swiss justice must live up to their expectations” stresses Vony Rambolamanana, Senior Legal Advisor at TRIAL International.

A possible recognition of Ousman Sonko’s role in the abuses committed during Yahya Jammeh’s regime would be an important sign for the transitional justice process undertaken by the Gambia in 2017. The recent news of the arrest of a human rights defender, a journalist and other activists raises fears of an upsurge in repressive measures against those who oppose the government. The trial of one of the senior officials of the Jammeh regime could send a strong signal, and give new impetus, to the search for truth and justice for which many Gambians have worked to date.

As a reminder, the accused was arrested in Bern on 26 January 2017. The day before, TRIAL International had filed a criminal complaint against him. On 17 April 2023, after more than six years of investigation, the Office of the Attorney General of Switzerland (OAG) filed an indictment before the Federal Criminal Court. The OAG accuses Ousman Sonko for having taken part in numerous acts of torture, kidnapping, sexual violence and killings perpetrated between 2000 and 2016 in The Gambia.

The fact that the case is finally going to trial is very important for our clients” says lawyer Fanny de Weck. “This trial should notably show whether hierarchical superiors – and not just those who executed the crimes – can be held to account on the basis of universal jurisdiction” adds lawyer Nina Burri. Both lawyers are representing private plaintiffs in the trial against Ousman Sonko.

The proceedings will be in German and open to the public and journalists within the limits of the available courtroom space.

Interest journalists can request accreditation with the General Secretariat of the FCC.

Further information provided by the FCC.

For more details: read our press release of 18 April 2023 and our Q&A. (available in English, French and German)

Between 2014 and 2017, The Gambia exported nearly 163 million US dollars-worth of rosewood, a rare and precious tree species, to China. During this time, Westwood, a Gambian company presumably owned by Swiss national Nicolae Bogdan Buzaianu and former Gambian President Jammeh, had the exclusive license to export rosewood. The timber it exported was illegally felled in neighboring Casamance where the separatist armed group has been fighting the Senegalese army for decades. TRIAL International filed a criminal complaint with the Swiss Office of the Attorney General against Mr. Buzaianu accusing him of having pillaged conflict timber.

The logs felled in the Senegalese region of Casamance were smuggled across the Gambian border and left in open depots before being sold to traders. ©TRIAL International

According to the criminal complaint (dénonciation pénale) filed by TRIAL International, Swiss businessman Nicolae Bogdan Buzaianu’s company was involved in the pillaging of precious rosewood from Casamance between 2014 and 2017. During this period, Westwood Company Ltd – which, according to TRIAL International’s findings, Mr. Buzaianu co-founded with former Gambian President Yahya Jammeh – had a monopoly on the export of rosewood, a precious tropical wood from The Gambia. But with Gambian rosewood nearly depleted since 2011, most of the timber was actually imported from Casamance, a region in southern Senegal that borders The Gambia. For several decades, large areas of this region have been under the control of the separatist armed group, the Mouvement des forces démocratiques de Casamance (MFDC).

“Exploiting natural resources from a conflict zone is a war crime that must be punished. Without the pillaging of natural resources, many armed groups would have no means of financing their wars’, said Montse Ferrer, Senior Legal Advisor and Corporate Accountability Coordinator at TRIAL International. ‘Despite numerous documented cases of pillage, not a single conviction has been made since the end of World War II.’”

TRIAL International filed a criminal complaint for pillage against Mr. Buzaianu in Switzerland with the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) in June 2019. ‘We have waited until today to go public because we wanted to give the Swiss prosecutorial authorities sufficient time to review the evidence and, as the case may be, take decisive action against Mr. Buzaianu. We are hopeful that these steps have been taken and that the OAG is investigating the matter’, she added.

LOGGING THAT BENEFITS AN ARMED GROUP

Some estimates suggest that Senegal loses the equivalent of 40,000 hectares of forest per year, several dozen hectares of which are lost due to the illegal exploitation of rosewood in Casamance. This selective deforestation has led to a decrease in rainfall and increased desertification in the region. It has also led to conflicts between rebels and communities who can no longer use the forests for sustainable livelihoods.

Illegal logging of precious woods is problematic, as it undermines reforestation efforts in the region. According to the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), “in the village of Koudioube, the restoration of the community forest has helped to overcome conflicts.” Illegal logging has stopped, fruits and wildlife are abundant, and local people are once again able to sell forest products. Communities that used to fight each other are now working together.

A large share of the trafficking and logging has been taking place directly in the territory controlled by the MFDC for almost thirty years. ‘Westwood’s illegal activity is all the more serious because it contributed to an illegal timber trade that has historically financed the MFDC. Equally striking is that this trade has had such a negative impact on the lives of local people contributing directly to the deforestation of the region’, said Jennifer Triscone, Legal Advisor at TRIAL International. The armed group exercises de facto control over the precious wood industry by issuing logging authorizations and transport permits, and by ensuring the security of the latter. The rebels also illegally exploit and sell precious hardwood timber to finance their armed struggle: an illegal trade fueled by demand from the global tropical hardwood market.

 

  Read the full press kit